Quote:
|
Originally Posted by talk2tiny
My equations would be no more more credible than any of the others though so I'll have to give up.
|
What makes you say the equations already given in this thread already are not credible? why wouldn't yours be credible? and why give up?
Surely you can, and would like to, prove that your claim is correct.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by talk2tiny
I suspect we already have a few engineers here which is why there's so much astoundingly bad physics posted already.
|
While I'm at it, why did you feel the need to disrespect any engineers among us like this? Yes, I'm an engineer.
I dont think there was any need for an attack of that nature. Up until that point the discussion had been very civil with clear explanations of each persons claims and their reasons behind it. Yet for some reason you felt the need to reduce yourself to that level.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by talk2tiny
Lets just hope no-one has to find out the hard way.
|
^^^I agree.
In the end, with either of our claims, the best option is still the tree.
If your explanation is correct the tree impact will be less, if the other claim is correct, the impact with the tree will be no worse than that of the car so why hurt more people than necessary?