View Single Post
Old 21-05-2010, 05:35 PM   #12
Rodp
Regular Schmuck
 
Rodp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
That's why I favor point to point radar speed detection, it weeds out those
that speed everywhere and only slow down for the known single point radar traps....
Where they're placed, the fixed cameras are better IMO (if it's a choice between the two). We're talking about long highways where sitting near or on the speed limit, focusing on making sure your average speed over a determined distance is less than the posted limit is a lot more dangerous (and mind-numbing) than slowing down for 1 camera.

Recently did a trip out to Bathurst and I'm glad there was roadworks between the two average speed cameras which meant that there was no way you could break the average posted limit. I could travel at a comfortable speed at around 100kph instead of applying brakes on a downhill section of a two lane highway so I don't exceed the average speed.
Rodp is offline   Reply With Quote