Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator
It appears TA did have the authority to give the exemption. It also appears he had a "document" from the Department of Home Affairs  , although its not clear if this is a personalised doc or something his team just downloaded. Vic Gov's role is that they set up the review panel 
Of course, this is all his lawyer's submission, they'll still need to prove it. |
I was reading through the various articles earlier and they were all a good read. Ultimately things are always going to come out towards the end of the wash and we're starting to get to the pointy end.
But yes they still have to prove it all.
Point 3 is interesting. I'm looking forward to seeing what flows out from that.
Googling some more of the articles from Dan about the no vax no play rule, I noticed the earlier ones from October and so he was very firm that is was "not fully vaccinated then no play".
But I think the later articles he changed stance to "not fully vaccinated then no play or valid medical exemption allowed". I saw quick references to that in later articles from November and December. I'll have to find them again tomorrow.
It occurred to me earlier that Djokovic has to win this appeal. Some of the stuff I read earlier indicated that if someone has a visa denied it may be grounds to refuse future visas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator
The other funny thing is, he claims he tested positive on the 16th, but tweeted on the 18th a photo of him receiving his own stamp at a ceremony  |
That is scary in itself. If he was definitely infected and knew it it shows his attitude toward covid and his little care for other people.
Or maybe he never had covid at all.......
The final date to apply for an exemption was the 10/12. His previous covid infection was in June 2021, outside of the 6 month window prior to the 10/12. But yet he has an exemption processed at least 6 days or more after the latest cut off. Seems TA was desperate to have him in the tournament.
Go figure!