Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator
Not disputing the fact that they agreed. Not disputing the states probably saw a chance to prop up their hotel industry. But fact is, it was their (Feds) responsibility.
If a CFO went to a CIO and said his finance team will develop and install a piece of software because they liked it so much, and the CIO agreed, and the software crashed the organisation, who is ultimately accountable?
We might find out if/when minutes of the national cabinet is made available. Court has ruled that these minutes should be made available, but FOI requests from a senator keeps getting blocked. Maybe a royal inquiry is needed.
|
They are being held accountable despite it being agreed to. It should have been the short to medium term solution.
The states wanted all the control until it cost too much and got out of hand and then wanted to flick the dog**** over the fence. Then they fall back to it's not our responsibility
National cabinet decisions are not binding. It's a forum to achieve consensus but even when they do some go their own way. The minutes would be interesting to clarify.