Big Bad Barry Hall Guilty Or Not

GRNKPR · 19-09-2005, 11:47 PM

he should get off if reported as pussy from St Kilda took a falland was acting and then what made me laugh was little sooky Max hudgeton have a go at Bazz ,if the AFL haddnt turned so gay they would let em box on ,What are we breeding a bunch of nancy boys or are we men

SYDNEY TO WIN THE FLAG

Psycho Chicken · 19-09-2005, 11:50 PM

By men you mean brain dead thugs, right?

GRNKPR · 19-09-2005, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Chicken

By men you mean brain dead thugs, right?

Yeah brain dead thugs HOW MUCH DO YOU EARN A YEAR ????????????????

Psycho Chicken · 19-09-2005, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GRNKPR

Yeah brain dead thugs HOW MUCH DO YOU EARN A YEAR ????????????????

I fail to see what that has to do with anything?

I don't care if Maguire played the whole thing up, why do you need to be throwing punches in football? If you wanna do that go box. I guess it's just further proof there's no such thing as sportsmanship anymore.

Falcon Freak · 19-09-2005, 11:57 PM

Barry Hall is guilty and will not play this Saturday.

Go Weagles!

FF

blueoval · 19-09-2005, 11:52 PM

Not sure what the verdict would be but Matt Maguire should get an academy award for the show he put on after he got hit! He looked like he was near death!

MickyB · 19-09-2005, 11:54 PM

My uncle went to the game and said Maguire was vomiting after the hit, thats pretty good acting. Halls knows how to hit and should know better. I want Hall to miss the game and the Swans to win, would be nice and bittersweet for Baz.

GRNKPR · 19-09-2005, 11:59 PM

next season they all should wear dresses as the game is too santised

you dont have to go round king hitting but just a little biifo keeps em on their toes

**Full Noise** · 20-09-2005, 05:41 AM

Who the Hell is Barry Hall? :hihi:

Cheers, Danny

JPFS1 · 20-09-2005, 09:53 AM

guilty as charged... just proves how stupid this big ape is... (will say he has been a great player this year).

hope he gets done though as he is obviously missing too many brain cells to comprehend how important it is to stay clear of this sort of thing at this stage of their season.

GONE!

parawolf · 20-09-2005, 09:56 AM

I'm a saints supporter, and personally the amount that Barry Hall was being messed with before the 'strike' was legitimately covered by his single "Don't argue".

Personally I reckon there has been worse offences and this one was just a matter of timing (grand final and all) so he got pinged - if it was round 4, it wouldn't have made a report.

I reckon he should be allowed to play the grand final.

Pilch · 20-09-2005, 10:00 AM

GRNKPR it's okay to be going hard at the ball and causing some "biffo" action, but hitting someone blatantly is unacceptable!

He's guilty..... although Maguire must have been acting, it didn't look that hard. Hall is *just* worthy of one week suspension.

Bloods for premiers!!!

TheSneakiness · 20-09-2005, 10:17 AM

He's GOOONNNNE.

You'd have to be a fool to put your Finals dream in jeopardy for some stupid thing like that.

Des · 20-09-2005, 10:21 AM

Did he strike another player? = YES
Therefore = GUILTY
It wasn't a severe case of striking, but it is a severe case of STUPIDITY!

:

Leah · 20-09-2005, 10:28 AM

meh... let him play! Theyre all such pussies now days! Bring back the biff!

wOO HOO, just noticed that was my 100th post. Damn i shoulda saved it for something better

20-09-2005, 11:09 AM

They will try to convince them that Barry Hall wasnt behind the play, rather he was going for a lead. Apparently it will be a lot harder for him to get off if they determine it was behind the play...

MY thoughts, well im a die hard Saints fan, so give him 3 weeks to boofhead!

Caviar · 20-09-2005, 11:22 AM

Well being an eagles supporter I want him to play, so if/when :P we win, then there'll be no reflux of "you only won cause barry wasn't playing". As to should he play, I think it would be unfair to the other players in similar occurances of striking whom have all received 1 week, if he was to get off.

As to whether he is guilty or not, he pleaded guilty hence only 1week suspension and not 2.

AdzT3-146 · 20-09-2005, 01:17 PM

gulity. but they are so inconsistent u never know what is gonna happen.
Gehrig copped a week for hitting cloke, but archer didnt get anything for hitting tredrea, neither did judd against rawlings. And they were all very similar.

phase.3 · 20-09-2005, 02:01 PM

Why would you punch someone in the semi-finals if your winning?
Guilty

losfp · 20-09-2005, 04:03 PM

The hit was there, but I think wrongly graded. The word is that they will argue that it was in play (shaping to make a lead, eyes on the ball) and negligent instead of reckless (consistent with the Eagles player who was reported the next day).

I reckon he will be a very very lucky boy - the tribunal will downgrade the charge to the point where he can escape with a reprimand.

Otherwise I and thousands of other Swans fans will be incredibly filthy with him for being so careless when we were THIS close.

I'd be sending my expenses bill for game ticket / time spent in queues / flights / accomodation to Barry Hall, c/o Sydney Football Club, Driver Ave, Moore Park, if he is suspended and we lose!

TheSneakiness · 20-09-2005, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by losfp

I'd be sending my expenses bill for game ticket / time spent in queues / flights / accomodation to Barry Hall, c/o Sydney Football Club, Driver Ave, Moore Park, if he is suspended and we lose!

Nah, just do it anyway. You'll feel better.

GRNKPR · 20-09-2005, 08:55 PM

he is cleared and saints player will be auditioning for "home and away "and also "neighbors" but with acting like last friday night he wouldnt even get a gig on kids tv
The tribuneral has spoken

MNM96 · 20-09-2005, 08:59 PM

The bloke is a retard and hits like a Poof. Should be sent to play AFL. Oh hang on, Sorry. He does already. Ignore this post :ymca:

:

e

Supa R00 · 20-09-2005, 09:57 PM

GUILTY AS CHARGED!!! Im an umpire and like that u dont need... He hit him deliberetly and should be punished accordingly, who cares if he has the GF, it shouldnt make a difference otherwise semi finals will just become a big sluggingfest with a free ticket to the GF.

Hes a grown man... he should be responsible for his actions and if hes stupid enough to do that in the finals well he deserves what he gets

xbcoupe302 · 21-09-2005, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GRNKPR

he should get off if reported as pussy from St Kilda took a falland was acting and then what made me laugh was little sooky Max hudgeton have a go at Bazz ,if the AFL haddnt turned so gay they would let em box on ,What are we breeding a bunch of nancy boys or are we men

SYDNEY TO WIN THE FLAG

exactly its not netball its a contact sport they need to take it back to the good old days where the cameras wernt there if the umpire didnt see u him somebody good luck because the next time the guy who got hit would square it up by hitting back behind play.

thats afl.

GRNKPR · 21-09-2005, 06:33 PM

[QUOTE=xbcoupe302]exactly its not netball its a contact sport they need to take it back to the good old days where the cameras wernt there if the umpire didnt see u him somebody good luck because the next time the guy who got hit would square it up by hitting back behind play

i am a hard **** but you dont have to hit behind play but let it be as ruff as it can be

bring back the good ol shirtfront that will sort a few of the cafe latte sippers

: ]

xbcoupe302 · 21-09-2005, 07:51 PM

nah i want another one like the 89 grand final when only the men were left standing

im sure barry would be one of them.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode