|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
29-06-2006, 12:11 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wantirna South, Melbourne
Posts: 425
|
The oil companies claim that 98 octane gives you more Km's, a cleaner engine and better performance. I put the 95 in my XR8, but @ 5c a litre more are the benefits worth the cost for 98. If the distance I travel is increased then the cost is realitive so I guess the real question is, what is the advantage for the Windsor to running 98 over 95, in other words are the claims by the oil companies re 98 realistic or rubbish?
|
||
29-06-2006, 01:08 PM | #2 | ||
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
|
That's an interesting question! I originall started using shell optimax (98 Octane) back when it first came out and was getting nearly 100 kms more out of each tank out of a 95 Corolla, so for me the price difference was more than made up for by the extra distance travelled!
Over time though, I don't know if it's just me, but I'm struggling to get any extra distance out of 98 these days - dunno if the quality's changed or what? |
||
29-06-2006, 01:12 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 606
|
When I first got my car I used to do 2 tanks of regular to 1 of Premo (optimax) I found I was getting heaps better milege out of the Optimax over 100kms.. So now I use it all the time.
I think the value for money is more then just milege, as its better fuel so Im assuming its better for your engine.
__________________
Have you got an FPV or XR6/8 and live in the ACT or surrounding area? Come and check out the FPV & XR Owners Club of ACT AUI VCT: To date - Big brake upgrade, Koni and Kings all round, 2.5 cat back ready for replacing, 19" again ready for replacing. Planned - Too much now I got the baby back. |
||
29-06-2006, 01:18 PM | #4 | ||
Capri GT/TS50/GTR
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 831
|
i always use optimax/vortex98. find it much better the 95 or 90
|
||
29-06-2006, 01:51 PM | #5 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wantirna South, Melbourne
Posts: 425
|
MR XR8 wrote
Quote:
|
|||
29-06-2006, 02:39 PM | #6 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 465
|
I'm pretty sure RACV either one of the car mags or the RACV tested it not all that long ago. From memory the 95 octane gave more performace in a stock falcon than the 98, however the differences were very little. Might also be different for the XR's etc
|
||
29-06-2006, 02:48 PM | #7 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 105
|
Have been using 95 but my last 2 tanks have been 98 very little difference performance or mileage in my Xr.
__________________
My Ride
2005 BA MKII F6 Typhoon- details soon. |
||
29-06-2006, 02:57 PM | #8 | ||
Once PHASED.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Townsville
Posts: 972
|
I have always used 98 in my 351s.I did try a tank of 95 in one once and found I had to push harder to achieve the same performance using more fuel etc. I also think if your engine cant benefit from using 98 why use it..inmo
__________________
2006 BF XR8 Bionic. |
||
29-06-2006, 03:05 PM | #9 | ||
Capri GT/TS50/GTR
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 831
|
the car idles better and does get a more ks out of a tank.
|
||
29-06-2006, 03:37 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 581
|
Bare in mind that at 5 cents difference even filling with an average of 50 litres thats only $2.50 more for 98ron fuel which wont even buy 2 litres of fuel. If your car averages 12 L/100km then you would only have to get an extra 16km from the tank and it's paid for itself. Also fuel quality varies slightly in batches and if you use 95ron that is not quite at the mark causing pinging then a fuel addative that will actually stop it pinging is about $20.
It's all just food for thought but even at 10cents a litre difference I still always use 98-BP Ultimate. |
||
29-06-2006, 03:41 PM | #11 | |||
Back to Le Frenchy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back home.....
Posts: 13,346
|
I only ever use 98ron fuel in mine and I do about 60,000k a year. Get about 100-110k more out of it per tank and the car also runs better and doesn't ping.
__________________
Quote:
07 Renault Sport Megane F1 Team R26 #1397
|
|||
29-06-2006, 03:57 PM | #12 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wantirna South, Melbourne
Posts: 425
|
Thanks guys. How interesting, some of you seem to be saying that there is limited improvement and others good improvement. Howesy you make some very good points.
|
||
29-06-2006, 04:01 PM | #13 | ||
Fantastic Plastic
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mars most of the time
Posts: 2,019
|
yep im a 98 man all the way , better bang for buck , better economy , etc etc.
I have also noticed sometimes in the past when being a bit poorer i have once in a blue moon used 95 , power seems around the same , allthough the economy ain't as good , but i also get slight misses now and then while running 95 ( like the symptoms of a bad sparkplug or lead ) . Sum it up.. Whatever works best for you and your car really .
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ :eclipsee_ |
||
29-06-2006, 04:11 PM | #14 | ||
Ford POWER!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 129
|
What about the new shell optimax100, it costs a arm and a leg - but seems to make my xr run alot better.
__________________
Liquid Silver Ford Falcon AUII XR6 HP Manual : |
||
29-06-2006, 05:38 PM | #15 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,078
|
Im pretty sure, a program.. ACA or Today Tonight, proved 95 was pretty.
__________________
|
||
29-06-2006, 05:41 PM | #16 | ||
Miami Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,703
|
pretty what?
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb) 1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs). Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings FPV 335 build stats: <click here> Ford Performance Club ACT |
||
29-06-2006, 07:30 PM | #17 | ||
Smile
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Merrylands Sydney
Posts: 8,541
|
98 octane fuel helps if your car pings and then gives more power.If your car is not pinging then chances are it doing nothing.
__________________
Stingray Car Security ph 0414445444 Single din radio fascias for fg to fgx fords Australia wide . FG 1 2 and 3 gauge holder in stock now! https://stingraycar.com.au/shop/ Site Sponsor See Sponsor Stingray Car Security 😍👌✌ AU wagon 6 14.241@96.75 1/4 mile sold.Octane fg xr6 turbo!! 12.312 112.21 mph home tune f6 injectors gone ..now in nitro fgxr6t ready to go again |
||
29-06-2006, 08:27 PM | #18 | ||
Giddy up.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,637
|
I use 98 in my XR and 95 in my Laser, both get better millage than the lesser grade fuel that they used to run on, but I will never touch regular anymore.
|
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|