If you want a tuff car buy this

[250 PURSUIT]

Now this is a car

[rob_o]

I see no car

[EA2BA]

Originally Posted by rob_o

I see no car

Thats how quick it is :

[250 PURSUIT]

i need a moderator any one out there it will not let me upload!!!!!!!!!!

[Pearly]

*hosted image for 250 PURSUIT*

Here ya go mate. Image was too big to upload to FF.com.au

[250 PURSUIT]

now this is a car $200,000 usd if you want one

[xdc351]

A review of this beast is available HERE

[250 PURSUIT]

Originally Posted by xdc351

A review of this beast is available HERE

Thanks for that

[parawolf]

Yes please. How about following the same concept ford... Falcon XR8 Sprint? for club race duties? Similar to HSV GTS-R

[250 PURSUIT]

http://www.pearly351.com/images/hosted/nice.jpg

Check this baby out!!!!!!!!!1 :

[NAK302]

Originally Posted by 250 PURSUIT

http://www.pearly351.com/images/hosted/nice.jpg

Check this baby out!!!!!!!!!1 :

can't be THAT quick, it's got no motor :

[sbutler]

Originally Posted by ianmcginley

Yes please. How about following the same concept ford... Falcon XR8 Sprint? for club race duties? Similar to HSV GTS-R

Now that's a great idea!!!!! I'll have one.... :

[Mike Gayner]

What the hell? You people actually like this atrocity? It looks f*cking ridiculous.

[Laminge]

you would think that for 200kusd they could afford to paint the bonnet?

Got alot going for it, put please, that color scheme, is well....:togo: :jerk: :countdown :tosser1: :jab:

[NAK302]

Originally Posted by LAMINGE

you would think that for 200kusd they could afford to paint the bonnet?

Got alot going for it, put please, that color scheme, is well....:togo: :jerk: :countdown :tosser1: :jab:

it's probably like that to replicate the mid sixties trans am race stangs
i love the colour, the ironing board on the boot looks a bit howyagoin though.

[stockstandard]

It appeals to me because it is a little ugly. It looks like a purpose built machine that is made to be driven hard.

[XAHardtop]

The wing is ugly, but no doubt there for a purpose if that cammer 5.0L donk is revving hard pushing that beast around a track.

[lv619]

I'll take two thanks...





yes, i think the colour scheme needs some refinement.

[tickford2001]

oooooo yeh i would have one of those anyday - seriously tough looking machine

yeh i agree ian *hint hint* ford australia...do something tough!! :

[Supa R00]

i dunno about that spoiler but the aggresive looks and stance of the vehicle is tops!

[champsky]

bah! the whole car looks swwwweeeeeet as! and i mean the whole package!!!!

i think some people in here are GTwingaphobic as well as having a case of blackbonnetatitis :P

although i would like it in all black hehehehe

[Falcon Coupe]

I love it, and the spoiler would come in handy with 500hp on the track.

[Steffo]

I think the Mustang GT-R is fugly. 440hp @ 7000rpm and 400ftlbs @ 5500rpm isn't my cup of tea either. A Supercharged 5.4 with 500hp @ 6000 and 600ftlbs @ 2000 - 5000rpm would be much nicer IMHO. 600ftlbs throughout the rev range... mmm... torque...

It would be a great thing, in a car that looked like the normal GT Mustang.

Or maybe this car...


1967 Ford GT Mk4

7.0litre (427ci) Big Block V8
373kW @ 6400rpm
637Nm @ 5000rpm

0-100km/h: 3.3 sec (est.)
Standing-1/4 Mile: 10.5 sec (est.)
Top Speed: 354km/h

Ford will never have the balls to make a car like that again, which is a shame. They could make every supercar/exotic car maker quiver in fear, just like they did to Ferrari and such in the 1960's.

[JBonDSS]

Originally Posted by Steffo

Ford will never have the balls to make a car like that again, which is a shame. They could make every supercar/exotic car maker quiver in fear, just like they did to Ferrari and such in the 1960's.

I'm Pretty sure Ford or one of there production houses has remade it in the last 6-8months or so.


now the price on the 05 gt-r 200k is way excessive, When they released photos of the 05 range the photos of the gt-r the price was $60k usd

as the std v8 mustang price is mid $30k


Ohh I think it looks HORN as. :eclipsee_

[MRJUCY]

Originally Posted by Steffo

I think the Mustang GT-R is fugly. 440hp @ 7000rpm and 400ftlbs @ 5500rpm isn't my cup of tea either. A Supercharged 5.4 with 500hp @ 6000 and 600ftlbs @ 2000 - 5000rpm would be much nicer IMHO. 600ftlbs throughout the rev range... mmm... torque...

It would be a great thing, in a car that looked like the normal GT Mustang.

Thats a little over 540Nm which isn't bad for NA 5 Litres seeing the thing wouldn't be overly heavy & how its geared. Torque is nice but there is something for me that ringing the crap out of strong NA engine that no amount of boost can replace despite what a bit of paper says.

[Steffo]

Originally Posted by JBonDSS

I'm Pretty sure Ford or one of there production houses has remade it in the last 6-8months or so.

Are you talking about the 2005 GT? The 410kW 678Nm car that can match the '67 GT40 Mk4 for 0-100km/h acceleration, is almost 1 sec down in 1/4 mile, 24km/h slower top end, and slower around a race track?

Considering how awesome the GT40 was back in 1967 (a car as fast wasn't built until the McLaren F1 in 1993)... the new GT is a pushover... it pushes no boundaries like the old one did, it simply conforms.

As for the GT-R.. are they even going to make that thing?

[XP6]

Its a fugly, yanks cant do retro without over doing it!

Nice. If the wing is removed (for street duties) she will be a fine looking car.

[DJM83]

that car is horn heaps better lookin then the GTS-R yeah ill have one 2 luv the wheels

[forsaken]

looks pretty damn tuff