|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
10-03-2011, 05:30 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
|
Hi Guys,
The new 2011 Volvo XC60 T5 features the I4 EcoBoost engine and the 6-speed PowerShift gearbox that the Falcon is getting towards the end of the year. I had a look at the Volvo website and the car’s performance is reported at 8.1sec (0-100) and 8.7ltr/100km (combined fuel consumption) with the Volvo weighting 1740Kg. The Falcon in its I6 configuration weight about 1730KG and considering that the EcoBoost I4 is expected to bring a weight reduction of 80 – 90KG it seems that 7.7sec(0 - 100) and 8.2ltr/100km is not out of reach. Opinions? |
||
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 05:58 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
0-100 times won't mean a whole lot to the type of buyer its aimed at. more important will be the mid range torque. no doubt the zf will do a good job of keeping the engine in its sweet spot once you are up and going.
8.7l/100km is similar to camry. |
||
|
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 06:00 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
XT is 1690kg, so the 4 cylinder should be around 1600 to 1650kg.
|
||
|
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 06:21 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
just glanceing through the wheels car specs in the back pages , thats a reasonable time for a standard family sedan, if those volvo times are on the money, haveing a best guess that would give the ecoboost falcon a qaurter mile of low 16`s, possibly high 15`s on a good day, ie 6 cylander performance, i don`t think it would match the pace of an xr6 or sv6, but should account for its self well against the lower spec versions .
|
||
|
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 06:35 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,005
|
Also being 4wd there are economy and performance losses there that the Falcon wont have.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
|
|
|
|
10-03-2011, 07:39 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
|
I wonder if Ford will manage a better torque figure ... the Volvo is only 320nm and even though its flat its still a bit low i think.
The falcon should be more aero dynamic i would think but without actual specifications for both cars its hard to say which is better ... I want an EcoBoost thats cheap to buy and has a great modifications potential like the I6T |
||
|
|
|
|
08-02-2022, 03:26 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,011
|
So how are these holding up on the 2nd hand market?
If we find a cheap one, are they worth considering, or does a cheap price simply indicate it has major problems? Did these have problems with their DSG? |
||
|
|
|
The new 2011 Volvo XC60 T5 (I4 EcoBoost)
Hybrid Mode