Most reliable Falcon

[dylancox]

Which model of Falcon was the most reliable, or have any of us had a good run in a particular model Falcon and thought theirs is the most reliable?

[GS608]

I'd probably put my bet on the AU..

[FGII-XR6]

from my taxi experience I would say the AU you just couldn't kill them

[GT0132]

I had an EB2 Fairmont between 1994 nand 2004 and covered over 100,000 kms in it . Apart from a new brake master cyl in the early days, 2-3 sets of tyres and regular servicing the only cost was petrol, rego and insurance. A very reliable car

[Paxton]

AU. All the E Series upgrades, with one important extra - no head gasket problems.

[Grippy]

AU with live axle. Very underrated.

[DJM83]

Originally Posted by Grippy

AU with live axle. Very underrated.

Agreed

[XESP351]

I've never had one but I keep hearing that the AU Falcon is the most reliable falcon ever made, still is.

[Grippy]

Originally Posted by XESP351

I've never had one but I keep hearing that the AU Falcon is the most reliable falcon ever made, still is.

Most that have owned one would happily have another. There were just no major mechanical flaws, as stated head gasket problems had been sorted by AU launch and the live axle rear was tough as nails.

[LeadFoot81]

AU Falcon

[FGII-XR6]

AU 2 x taxi 870 000 Ks never had the head off he uses it now as a daily driver, need I say more

[burnz]

the AU from the red team, the right setup just wrong body.
perhaps before it's time..i think the AUIII would suit 2010/11 demographic better.

[malazn mafia]

Originally Posted by burnz

the AU from the red team, the right setup just wrong body.
perhaps before it's time..i think the AUIII would suit 2010/11 demographic better.

The red team?? I thought holden was the red team, unless you mean VT

[burnz]

Originally Posted by malazn mafia

The red team?? I thought holden was the red team, unless you mean VT

like many i bat for holden..

[Ford_The_Win]

Definitely the AU. Took everything they got right about the E-series and did it better.

[mash again]

Originally Posted by burnz

like many i bat for holden..

Many bat on the holden team....................hehe

My vote goes for the AU, bloke around the corner from me has run his out of water and hasnt serviced it for about 6 years, still ticks over nice, he will only work on it if it breaks, not often considering no servicing to speak off

[FGII-XR6]

Originally Posted by burnz

the AU from the red team, the right setup just wrong body.
perhaps before it's time..i think the AUIII would suit 2010/11 demographic better.

funny you should mention that it was really ahead of it's time when you consider aerodynamics. The AU had a Cd of 0.295 compare that to the following
Ferrari California 0.32
Lamborghini Murciélago 0.33
McLaren F1 0.32
Mazda RX-8 0.31
Lamborghini Diablo 0.31
B series Falcon 0.31
Aston Martin DB9 0.34
Ferrari F430 0.34

so the humble "ugly duckling" was way ahead of it's time I'd not all about look the overall design of a car is a big factor. Ford put a good package together but there were too many knockers out there

[malazn mafia]

Originally Posted by au3xr6

funny you should mention that it was really ahead of it's time when you consider aerodynamics. The AU had a Cd of 0.295 compare that to the following
Ferrari California 0.32
Lamborghini Murciélago 0.33
McLaren F1 0.32
Mazda RX-8 0.31
Lamborghini Diablo 0.31
B series Falcon 0.31
Aston Martin DB9 0.34
Ferrari F430 0.34

so the humble "ugly duckling" was way ahead of it's time I'd not all about look the overall design of a car is a big factor. Ford put a good package together but there were too many knockers out there

A B-series falcon with its square nose has the same Cd as a wedge shaped Lamborghini Diablo?.. am I seeing things

[FGII-XR6]

Originally Posted by malazn mafia

A B-series falcon with its square nose has the same Cd as a wedge shaped Lamborghini Diablo?.. am I seeing things

all genuine figures CD is more than just curves and how the car looks but then would you have expected the AU to beat these exotic sports cars?

[smoo]

I've put nearly 200k on AUs that I've owned and have yet to be stranded.
I'm sold on em, my latest one was chosen over BA Fairlane, BMW 740 and 540i, Alfa 156 V6 6 spd and Volvo S80 T6 and V70 wagon. All of which I looked at but for some reason couldn't stray from an AU.
And it seems anything that isn't as bland as all the jap *** polluting our roads are considered ugly (french cars, Volvos, bangle BMWs, AU coons). From a styling point the AU was far ahead of it's time, in particular the Fairmont Ghias with the tickford body kit and the AU3 XR6/8. They show how much the B series and VT-VZ have aged anyway.

[flappist]

Originally Posted by au3xr6

funny you should mention that it was really ahead of it's time when you consider aerodynamics. The AU had a Cd of 0.295 compare that to the following
Ferrari California 0.32
Lamborghini Murciélago 0.33
McLaren F1 0.32
Mazda RX-8 0.31
Lamborghini Diablo 0.31
B series Falcon 0.31
Aston Martin DB9 0.34
Ferrari F430 0.34

so the humble "ugly duckling" was way ahead of it's time I'd not all about look the overall design of a car is a big factor. Ford put a good package together but there were too many knockers out there

And if you actually understood what Cd actually means you would realise just how silly your statement is......

[Bad Bird]

Originally Posted by flappist

And if you actually understood what Cd actually means you would realise just how silly your statement is......

Agreed. CdA is the far more important value.

[TheInterceptor]

AU all the way.

[RAPID_BA]

the best to know are the taxi drivers. From the many ive spoken to, they say AU falcon.

They also say never buy the first series of a model, pretty safe if you buy series 2\3.

Really any falcon series 2 is pretty tough.

[The Monty]

Originally Posted by HULK_BA

the best to know are the taxi drivers. From the many ive spoken to, they say AU falcon.

They also say never buy the first series of a model, pretty safe if you buy series 2\3.

Really any falcon series 2 is pretty tough.

Nothing at all wrong with the AU1 from a reliability perspective, is that same as an AU2/3 but with slightly smaller brakes, which were fine in normal conditions.

[tweeked]

Yep AU.

No one drove them enough to break down

[FGII-XR6]

Originally Posted by tweeked

Yep AU.

No one drove them enough to break down

you mean like taxis ?

[ST]

Looks like the answer is pretty obvious, both my AU's were rock solid (one of which was a series I).

That being said my BFII has been absolutely flawless for the admittedly short period I've owned it.

[MexicanBatman]

Xp...

[Sprint]

XD falcon,electronic dizzy just out of the points generation but still not high tech,drivelines built ole school tuff also.

Apart from the door handles a bullet proof car in 6 and cleveland power.