Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-06-2007, 03:46 PM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,309
Thumbs up Harley Builds 2000cc & 2500cc engines !!

Is Harley about to join the displacement race? That topic has been buzzing around the internet with the discovery of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents mentioning a 2450cc V-twin engine. With Harley now running at the bottom of the big-twin displacement class, it's only a matter of time before Harley, which was once distinguished by having the largest motorcycle engines on the road, produces a bigger V-twin.

The EPA emissions document in question (scroll down to the last three pages, 8 through 10, of this PDF) shows testing results for liquid-cooled 2450cc and 2000cc Harley-Davidson V-twin engines. Power for the 2450cc version is listed as 98 kilowatts (131 horsepower) at 5000 rpm with 133 newton-meters (98 foot-pounds) of torque at 3500 rpm. The weight (presumably the GVWR) is listed at 1260 pounds. Since the fuel-tank material is listed as nylon, it would presumably be an under-seat style. The fuel-injected engine uses air injection and catalyst to reduce exhaust emissions.

However, don't get too excited yet. The title page (page 7) for this section is labeled as a "Hypothetical Application." There are other hints that the bike is also hypothetical. On the last page, the "Test Date" is listed as July 2007. The names of the bikes — Heritage Ultra Tail and Heritage Ultra Tail Special — sound more like jokes than anything Harley would bring to market, and a bike with a big, modern engine is unlikely to be called a Heritage. The designations — FLHTRSHCE and FLHTR-SE-9 — are those of current models, but an engine that different would likely be part of a new family, with new designations. The projected sales figures — 34,000 units a year — also seems slightly high for a bike that would certainly top $20,000. Finally, we doubt that any major vehicle manufacturer would permit such sensitive info to be released on a public website.

We expect to see larger Harley V-twins (and possibly other configurations) in the not-too-distant future (maybe even by the end of this month), but we aren't counting on this being one of them.

Thats bigger than my FIESTA !!!

csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-06-2007, 04:09 PM   #2
sleekism
1999 Ford Fairmont Ghia
 
sleekism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,162
Default

Isn't their a Triumph with a 2.3L triple?

I think it's funny that in the motorcycle world the Japs believe there is "no replacement for displacement"

I think the big four in Japan are now building 1400cc fours for their sports bikes and I think Suzuki are developing a transversely mounted Inline six sports bike.

Sorry to say that harleys aren't very interesting, Buells are brilliant bikes but they could be even better with a different engine.

Triumph would be the best pick over Harley they are beutiful twins at a bargain price.
sleekism is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-06-2007, 04:45 PM   #3
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Kawasaki has the ZX14 but thats all. Oh and of course there is the Hayabusa at 1300cc.

LOL at the 98kw Harley engine. My 636cc Ninja puts out 95kw and its 1 quarter of the size :
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-06-2007, 05:28 PM   #4
Mongoose
Can't go around corners
 
Mongoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Radelaide
Posts: 639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
Kawasaki has the ZX14 but thats all. Oh and of course there is the Hayabusa at 1300cc.

LOL at the 98kw Harley engine. My 636cc Ninja puts out 95kw and its 1 quarter of the size :
and about 1/10th of the amount of torque.
__________________
Quote from Jeremy Clarkson in the Top Gear Vietnam special:
Quote:
You know when we got to the 16th century, I think we turned left when we should have gone right, now were in the 13th century!
Mongoose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-06-2007, 06:16 PM   #5
schnoods
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
schnoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 1,234
Default

And to think the Screamin Eagle gear was enough.

1/4 the cylinders of an V8. 2450 x 4 and You almost have 10 litres!! Then put a Sprintex charger on it !

Very tempting indeed. Just cant wait to Buell has some sort of take on this.
__________________
A philosopher is a person who finds a problem for every solution . :Reverend:

95 EF XR8, Advance headers, Vortech V2 t trim blower, Ported Cobra Manifold, Capa Switch Chip Eliminator. 307 rwhp 395 ft/lb 13.2 @ 105mph

Now NA- AFR 165 heads, 1.6RR, Ported Cobra 269rwhp 14.2 ... needs stall and 4.11's

1977 CL Chrysler Panel Van, 360, 727 torqueflite auto soon to be restored.
schnoods is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-06-2007, 05:34 PM   #6
nugget378
Weezland
 
nugget378's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney,workshop mod
Posts: 7,216
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to impart knowledge in the technical areas. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mongoose10
and about 1/10th of the amount of torque.
And about twice as fast :
We wont mention handling shall we :
nugget378 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-06-2007, 08:38 PM   #7
woodsy109
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nugget378
And about twice as fast :
We wont mention handling shall we :
Still torque on the road is a lot more useable than outright kw's.

I have a CBR 954 and recently test rode a new zx6r and there is no way it would be fun riding that thing on the road. Even though my cbr is still setup for outright power, it has a lot more torque than the 600 and you don't have to rev the tits off it just to get it going. I'm a sportsbike fan but I can understand how having an engine like that would be very addictive.
woodsy109 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-06-2007, 01:03 PM   #8
GASWAGON
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,289
Default

Triumphs new 'Rocket III' which is a re incarnation of the 70's BSA model is an inline mounted 2.3 ltr 3 cyl 200Nm@2,500rpm.....Talk about Torque.....You could tow a loaded 6x4 trailer with it!!!

Last edited by GASWAGON; 17-06-2007 at 01:10 PM.
GASWAGON is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-06-2007, 04:25 PM   #9
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
Default

Now my gf needs a new car, i dont want people on bikes to have bigger motors than her car lol!
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-06-2007, 07:25 PM   #10
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkEB2
Triumphs new 'Rocket III' which is a re incarnation of the 70's BSA model is an inline mounted 2.3 ltr 3 cyl 200Nm@2,500rpm.....Talk about Torque.....You could tow a loaded 6x4 trailer with it!!!
In America you can get a turbo kit for the ROCKET 3 and Triumph are testing a 3000cc Rocket !!!!!!!!!!!!!! go you mad poms !!! Scruby ah ah ah!!!
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-06-2007, 07:37 PM   #11
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,309
Default

or a VIPER Bike with NOS !!
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2007, 07:54 AM   #12
Charliewool
Bolt Nerd
Donating Member3
 
Charliewool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ojochal, Costa Rica (Pura Vida!)
Posts: 14,904
Default

How about 502 CUBIC INCHES? (and around 760Nm).. AND Australian street registrable!
http://www.bosshoss.com.au/home.htm
__________________
Current vehicles.. Yamaha Rhino UTV, SWB 4L TJ Jeep, and boring Lhd RAV4
Bionic BF F6... UPDATE: Replaced by Shiro White 370z 7A Roadster. SOLD
Workhack: FG Silhouette XR50 Turbo ute (11.63@127.44mph) SOLD
2 wheels.. 2015 103ci HD Wideglide.. SOLD
SOLD THE LOT, Voted with our feet and relocated to COSTA RICA for some Pura Vida!
(Ex Blood Orange #023 FPV Pursuit owner : )
Charliewool is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2007, 08:48 PM   #13
GASWAGON
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charliewool
How about 502 CUBIC INCHES? (and around 760Nm).. AND Australian street registrable!
http://www.bosshoss.com.au/home.htm
Oh dear! Just checked them.......And i thought the Rocket III had grunt.....Those yanks are craaaazzzeee! : Would be awesome to ride one tho :
GASWAGON is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2007, 08:05 AM   #14
kyro_02
V8 wannaabeee
 
kyro_02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southbank, melb
Posts: 2,575
Default

yes please, buy me one of those v-twin bikes... sounds hot and beefy!
kyro_02 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2007, 08:52 AM   #15
TATT2
100% aussie hillbilly
 
TATT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 345
Default

I'll stick with my 1340cc harley....
TATT2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-06-2007, 02:27 PM   #16
KBBossedXR
GetBlown or GetBlown Away
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 593
Default

If its a V-TWIN and it wasnt made in ITALY, it will never sound, handle and go as good.
KBBossedXR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-06-2007, 02:42 PM   #17
jmi8
Regular Member
 
jmi8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 63
Default

Harley's are nice if you got a good dip tray in the garage... :
There's a 1800cc twin made by suzuki called the M109R which gets my blood pumping but nothing comes close to the new Ducati 1098s with full Termi pipes :sm_drool:
jmi8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-06-2007, 03:07 PM   #18
TATT2
100% aussie hillbilly
 
TATT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmi8
Harley's are nice if you got a good dip tray in the garage... :
triumphs drip oil, harleys just mark their spot,saying that, mines an 98 softail and never leaked one drop of oil in its life
TATT2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL