|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
17-06-2009, 06:49 PM | #1 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
http://www.carsales.com.au/reviews/2...0-hybrid-15366
while there is no mention of 'kers' (kinetic energy recovery system) as used in F1, it is clearly the same principle. the article does make numerous digs at the 'other' hybrid technology though. i think this is a great system, and as soon as it appeared in F1, i felt for sure it would filter through. merc have always been at the forefront of technology. i love their products. |
||
17-06-2009, 06:56 PM | #2 | ||
Cobblers!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
|
I have to say this - KERS is overrated.
Brawn don't use KERS, and haven't had any trouble winning races. Whilst I like the idea in concept, I think cost and complexity will keep this out of Mainstream cars until well into the future. As the old adage goes, if you want to see your average car in 20 years time, look at an S Class today.
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty. Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you. Last edited by Paxton; 17-06-2009 at 07:03 PM. |
||
17-06-2009, 06:58 PM | #3 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
in F1 it may be overrated at the moment (RBR don't use it either). i was merely commenting on it finding its way into road cars.
the s class comment may be true though, hadn't heard that before. good one. |
||
17-06-2009, 07:43 PM | #4 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 130
|
remember that not everyone in f1 used turbos but how useful and popular are they now
|
||
18-06-2009, 01:18 AM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,839
|
they banned the turbos once the 1.5ltr Hondas were banging out around 1400BHP!
|
||
18-06-2009, 02:15 AM | #6 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
|
mclaren mercedes has built a great kers system, can overtake any other f1 car on a straight with ease because of the system. pity the rest of the car is crap and cant hold speed through corners. Brawn will win the championship this year, but next year when kers is compulsory, they will fade and mclaren, renault, ferrari will come back to the fold as they are already using kers this year and will be a years worth of kers development infront of teams like brawn and redbull (who are relishing not having to use kers, as kers adds extra weight to the car). brawn and redbull in theory will slip back next year and beyond, as they are behind in development for 2010 and beyondcars. they are living in now, and not the future, and taking the accolades nowat the expense of future achievements.... BUT I MAY ENTIRELY WRONG, if the FOTA-FIA was isnt settled and a new breakaway f1`series is formed.
|
||
18-06-2009, 06:30 AM | #7 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
this thread was not so much about F1 (there is a 'pits' section for that), but about how merc have already implemented a very similar system to KERS in their road car.
there is no button to push but there must be sensors or something to know when to use the stored battery power, eg. under acceleration. early days but hats off to merc i reckon. |
||
18-06-2009, 07:39 AM | #8 | ||
re
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Victoria - where being slow & incompetent is considered being "safe"
Posts: 1,323
|
It must be like a mild overboost. It was introduced to F1 to try and force the development of similar systems in road cars, so it looks like it may justify some of the hype.
I’m always conscious of the “lost” energy from brakes. Up to 600 degrees at the front at some tracks (relatively heavy car). Especially on track days where my small engined car can go pretty deep in to a corner under brakes then loses to torque/acceleration out of tight corners…..Thinks this might change things when tracking road cars. Rather than maintain high corner speeds it may be an advantage in certain corners to just jam hard on the brakes and use the recovered energy to slingshot out the other side. I would love to try it at Sandown coming on to the front & back straights, Phillip Island at Honda corner, Winton at Dudleys elbow, around cleavage and the squirt or at Calder coming up to Mount Jane. Re: F1 Brawn are sharing drivelines with McLaren and Force India, I wonder if there is a technology sharing agreement with their KERS systems? A lot of the smaller teams seem to be buddying up to the larger teams due to the high cost of developing a KERS system. I also wonder how much pressure Mercedes brought to bear on McLaren to run KERS in their F1 cars this year (seeing as they could use it as a marketing platform for their road cars)? Last edited by Rev28K; 18-06-2009 at 07:48 AM. |
||
18-06-2009, 07:57 AM | #9 | ||
Guess Who's Back?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Sounds like a bit of creative marketing, don't all Hybrids use regenerative braking systems?
|
||