|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-04-2006, 09:02 PM | #1 | ||
Silky
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 32
|
I was at the lights today, behind 2 Nissan Skylines... one was about a 1998 and the other a few yrs older. When the lights went green they were off! Surprisingly the old one kicked ***...
So my question is for anyone who is familiar with the performance of these vehicles in stock... Is the XR8 or the XR6 turbo faster?
__________________
Ford Mustang GT, Black, 20" Chrome wheels, 2006 | SS VE Ute, Green, 2007. |
||
04-04-2006, 09:05 PM | #2 | |||
Aussie_Geo
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kensington, WA
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Peter
__________________
: Velocity Typhoon : :sm_headba 366 rwkw 770 Nm Xtreme Tuned and Nizpro Stage 2 :sm_headba WARNING! Highly Addictive
|
|||
04-04-2006, 09:28 PM | #3 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
mate if all is stock you will stay behind. If its the 6 speed auto, the XR8 should be quicker to 100, but I would say the XR6T would pip it over the 1/4.
Both cars are quick enough.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:31 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,252
|
According to the dealer at ford the xr6 is lighter anf performs better, quicker acceleration but over the 1/4 mile the xr8 wins.
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:30 PM | #5 | ||
DJR Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,575
|
My bet is that the Skylines weren't stockers. A Skyline with a bit more boost will run low 14's, like a stock XR6T.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:33 PM | #6 | ||
trying to get a leg over
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,690
|
In my experience a XR6T is faster than a R34 GTS-T, an XR8 is probably on par.
Start talking GTR Skylines, bye bye XR6T and XR8 in stock form. I love hosing ricers in their GTS-T's whenever i can.
__________________
Cameron ------------------------------------------------------ |
||
05-04-2006, 01:40 AM | #7 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,318
|
Quote:
Cheers Simon |
|||
04-04-2006, 09:35 PM | #8 | ||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
If they were stock, you'd do em convincingly. Having lived in Syd for some time I ate many a Skyline in my EF 5.0ltr. I had an N/A XR6 and it was considerably quicker than the Fairmont when we lined them up on private roads, under controlled conditions, on a sunny day, with a paramedic & fire unit onsite. Oh, and a helmet
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:37 PM | #9 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
There is no way that a ef is going to beat a turbo skyline of any nature..the driver must have been a doush bag.
Xr8 should win as they have more low down, but as I said, once the xr6t huffs up it will win.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:46 PM | #10 | |||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
Quote:
|
|||
04-04-2006, 09:52 PM | #11 | |||
Boooostn'
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide Northside
Posts: 905
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 FPV GS Ute - Kinetic, Supercharged 5.0L, 6spd ZF auto, leather interior - The Boosted Daily! 1979 XD Fairmont Ghia - Silver, 302C V8, Full velour interior, slowly building her up to be a tough cruiser! 2002 Nissan Patrol ST - Desert Gold, 4.8L DOHC 6cyl petrol (Soon to be reequipped with a 5.7L LS1 V8), 5speed auto, lifted, locked, 33's, nature destruction vehicle! |
|||
04-04-2006, 11:12 PM | #12 | |||
Team Urinal Cake Racing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
|
|||
05-04-2006, 08:22 AM | #13 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
Quote:
In my experience, driving both back to back, the XR8 should be a pooftenth quicker to 100, but then the xr6t will beat it down the 1/4 (for about the third time!) There is really stuff all difference etween them, both are good cars, do you want a V8 or a 6, thats the real question.
__________________
|
|||
04-04-2006, 09:49 PM | #14 | ||
DJR Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,575
|
Yeh, the N/A Skyline are crap. I've seen one race an auto EF at the runs and Skyline got killed.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:49 PM | #15 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
oh well I could probably beat a n/a skyline off the lights in my GF's barina......turbo and skyline + performance is implied.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 09:52 PM | #16 | |||
Oops, I slipped....
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
__________________
1995 EF Fairmont 5.0 Heritage Green - BTR with TCI 2500 stall - Ported E7's - Pacemaker Tri-Y's - 3" Mandrel-bent Lukey Exhaust 1984 XE S-Pack 250 Sno White - LPG - Single Rail - 2.5" Exhaust "Just because you don't understand something, does not make it wrong" |
|||
04-04-2006, 09:55 PM | #17 | |||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
Quote:
BTW - I'd back any stock BA XR (N/A incl) over a stock R33 GTS25t. Would have been a good match up when R33 was new though. Last edited by GTP006; 04-04-2006 at 10:22 PM. |
|||
04-04-2006, 11:10 PM | #18 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
The turbo is their only saviour. Now imagine the AU VCT Turboed VS Skyline T... That would be an interesting watch.. |
|||
05-04-2006, 12:29 AM | #19 | |||
Two > One
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
|
Quote:
|
|||
05-04-2006, 08:46 AM | #20 | |||
Boooostn'
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide Northside
Posts: 905
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 FPV GS Ute - Kinetic, Supercharged 5.0L, 6spd ZF auto, leather interior - The Boosted Daily! 1979 XD Fairmont Ghia - Silver, 302C V8, Full velour interior, slowly building her up to be a tough cruiser! 2002 Nissan Patrol ST - Desert Gold, 4.8L DOHC 6cyl petrol (Soon to be reequipped with a 5.7L LS1 V8), 5speed auto, lifted, locked, 33's, nature destruction vehicle! |
|||
04-04-2006, 09:52 PM | #21 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Thing is that most Skylines are not stock, as the engine and the rest of the driveline is really overengineered. Making more power is as simple as winding up the boost. |
|||
04-04-2006, 09:55 PM | #22 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,587
|
I thought we where talking stock here...I know turbo skylines are not immortal, but stock falcons are not going to hassle them.
__________________
|
||
04-04-2006, 10:26 PM | #23 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
|
If its anything with a turbo and north of a GTS-T, then the Fords will struggle.
The skylines have an international reputation for a reason, either stock or modified. The same cannot be said for our fords - yet (dave_au gives a nudge to the typhoon) GMH8TR, no offense, but Magna Vrx's are known for getting ahead of 5L ELs. |
||
04-04-2006, 11:05 PM | #24 | |||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
Quote:
|
|||
04-04-2006, 10:29 PM | #25 | ||
DJR Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,575
|
A stock XR6T will beat a Stock GTS-T, no question.
__________________
Last edited by Aeron; 04-04-2006 at 11:10 PM. |
||
04-04-2006, 11:08 PM | #26 | ||
Turbine Power
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 120
|
A GTR will destroy a stock XR6-T
|
||
04-04-2006, 11:37 PM | #27 | |||
.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,197
|
Quote:
|
|||
05-04-2006, 05:31 PM | #28 | |||
Official AFF conservative
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
|
Quote:
Now, that against an XR6T... i wouldnt call comparing apples with apples. What are some $100k+ cars we can pit against an R34GTR because an XR6T simply isnt in the same league (no too far off tho which demonstrates the value for money we're getting with these turbocharged falcons). Of course, we're talking stock.... Bent_8 - interesting comments about regency Friend of mine bringing in an EVO8 (on the boat as we speak i think) and they're looking at 3 months minimum to get the thing complied.
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria. |
|||
05-04-2006, 05:39 PM | #29 | ||
BLUE OVAL INC.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,714
|
I think we should compare the GTR to a ferrari or a lambo or some other exotic, purpose built, limited build no race car.
Yeah rediculous i know But hey he took the price cap over $100k im just making the GTR look slow now. Ferrari Enzo 1/4 mile in 10.8@135mph Nissan Skyline 1/4 mile slower than that Last edited by BENT_8; 05-04-2006 at 06:08 PM. |
||
04-04-2006, 11:40 PM | #30 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 939
|
I think in compares it will come down to weight ratios and how much thing are weighting down the car and how fast the car would kick in the power
|
||