Which one is the brake again?

[pauljh74]

http://www.news.com.au/national/elde...-1225846663107

Originally Posted by Herald Sun

Elderly driver is backward at reversing

A QUIET trip to the hardware store turned into a nightmare for an elderly driver.

While parking, the driver apparently mistook the accelerator for the brake pedal.

The car flew forward and smashed into a concrete wall at Bunnings on the Nepean Highway in Mentone, Victoria.

With the engine still revving, it seems he may have then slipped the car into reverse.

It flew backwards at some speed, mounted a curb and smashed into two parked cars, narrowly missing a shopper.

And with the engine still revving, it seems the driver then put it back into forward gear, propelling the car back into the wall.

Police, the fire brigade and ambulance attended, the car was a write-off and the driver, who has not been named, was taken to hospital.

I hope the Police review the man's licence. This man has narrowly avoided hitting someone, damaged 2 cars, but despite hitting the same object twice and parked cars from hitting the wrong pedal, no-one in the press is having a go at the driver's skills, or lack thereof.

I think careless driving would be fair - if your abilities are that far gone yet you still get behind the wheel - it is criminal. I 100% believe this was an accident, but I don't accept that someone who has hit the wrong pedal, driven forwards then selected reverse and drive again is fit for the road.

But do a little burnout and you're public enemy no 1 - just ask Lewis

[RRM]

This sentence - the logical structure has serious problems.

Originally Posted by pauljh74

if your abilities are that far gone yet you still get behind the wheel - it is criminal. I 100% believe this was an accident...

So... is it criminal, or is it an accident? I'm confused.

Originally Posted by pauljh74

But do a little burnout and you're public enemy no 1 - just ask Lewis

You have a problem with oldies getting all confused and making a mistake, but someone deliberately breaking traction for no reason should be perfectly acceptable behaviour on public roads? I'm confused... again...

[pauljh74]

Originally Posted by RRM

This sentence - the logical structure has serious problems.


So... is it criminal, or is it an accident? I'm confused.



You have a problem with oldies getting all confused and making a mistake, but someone deliberately breaking traction for no reason should be perfectly acceptable behaviour on public roads? I'm confused... again...

It was an accident - I'm sure Mr Magoo didn't decide to go and crash into a wall.
Criminal due to being careless - he wasn't exercising a degree of care and attention that a reasonable driver should exercise.

Just as someone running into the back of a car could be charged with the same offence - it is an accident - one that is avoidable.

Which one is more serious - Lewis spinning the wheels and hitting nothing or an incompetent elderly driver getting the pedals mixed up, hitting 2 cars, narrowly missing a pedestrian and hitting a concrete wall twice, writing off their car? According to the press, Lewis Hamilton is a bigger problem

[deesun]

Police will say it was speed related.

[RedHotGT]

Originally Posted by deesun

Police will say it was speed related.

Which is in fact correct...

Because he wouldn't have hit the wall, the cars, or anything else if he was stationary (ie: Speed 0km/h)...

[buggo]

If he was 17 his car would get crushed.
But seriously, if you make that kind of stuff up, surely his lisence should be up for review.
I see alot of older people make careless mistakes and misjudge spaces while merging, parking or going 25% below the limit all the time. It's really not safe to drive, for both there sake and otheres, when your memory, reactions, instincts has fallen to this level.

[RedHotGT]

Originally Posted by buggo_gt

If he was 17 his car would get crushed.
But seriously, if you make that kind of stuff up, surely his lisence should be up for review.
I see alot of older people make careless mistakes and misjudge spaces while merging, parking or going 25% below the limit all the time. It's really not safe to drive, for both there sake and otheres, when your memory, reactions, instincts has fallen to this level.

Which is why you should have to review your license (or do a refresher course) every 5 years... every 2 years once you are over 60 perhaps?

I'm sure there is rules out there that I don't know or understand 100%... and i've only been driving for 12 years...

[buggo]

Originally Posted by loftie

Which is why you should have to review your license (or do a refresher course) every 5 years... every 2 years once you are over 60 perhaps?

I'm sure there is rules out there that I don't know or understand 100%... and i've only been driving for 12 years...

I think there is something like this. My grandad had to renew his lisence, but he was well over 70, and it my just be a matter of going into the RTA, getting your photo taken and have a nice day. There comes a point where this isn't adequete, and should be ask kindly to hand in there lisence, walk down the street and grab a bus home, via the RSL.
But I'm also not 100% on the procedures on this, so it my already be like this.
But yes, entriely agree with having a test after 60.

[RedHotGT]

Originally Posted by buggo_gt

I think there is something like this. My grandad had to renew his lisence, but he was well over 70, and it my just be a matter of going into the RTA, getting your photo taken and have a nice day. There comes a point where this isn't adequete, and should be ask kindly to hand in there lisence, walk down the street and grab a bus home, via the RSL.
But I'm also not 100% on the procedures on this, so it my already be like this.
But yes, entriely agree with having a test after 60.

There isn't a test, or anything close to it...

My father in law 61 years old is blind... he has between 3-5% vision... has been on disability pension (due to being so blind he cannot work) for the past 20years...

He has a valid drivers license, and actually only just sat for his boat license around 2 years ago... and by his own admission, would fail an eye test outright if he was asked to sit one...

So long as he keeps paying renewal on his license, he will continue to hold a valid drivers license...

And when he sat his boat license, he was not required to do an eye test because he held a current vaild drivers license...

I've spoken to a couple of police officers who have said that he would 'in the eyes of the law' (pardon the pun) be legally allowed to drive a car...

Thats our system now... Bravo Vicroads / VIC Government... Bravo...

[redman]

Originally Posted by loftie

There isn't a test, or anything close to it...

My father in law 61 years old is blind... he has between 3-5% vision... has been on disability pension (due to being so blind he cannot work) for the past 20years...

He has a valid drivers license, and actually only just sat for his boat license around 2 years ago... and by his own admission, would fail an eye test outright if he was asked to sit one...

So long as he keeps paying renewal on his license, he will continue to hold a valid drivers license...

And when he sat his boat license, he was not required to do an eye test because he held a current vaild drivers license...

I've spoken to a couple of police officers who have said that he would 'in the eyes of the law' (pardon the pun) be legally allowed to drive a car...

Thats our system now... Bravo Vicroads / VIC Government... Bravo...

I suggest you have a look at the Vic Roads site, under "Licences", then Medical Conditions and driving". There is a short article that points out that you may report a driver.

From the Vic Roards site...

"Reporting a medically unfit driver
If you are genuinely concerned about someone’s ability to drive safely, write us a letter with their details (eg. name, address) and the reasons for your concern. Under Victorian law, we must investigate this information."

The investigation usually involves Vic Roards "inviting" the driver to supply current medical information, including valid eye tests. If they fail, the license will be cancelled.

One further point, in the time frame between notification of the cancelled license and it actually taking effect, make sure you sell the car as you need the license to effect disposal. Also use the soon to be cancelled license as an identity aid to aapply for something like a KeyPass Photo ID.

Regards.

[BIGJB]

In QLD over 70 they need a Dr certificate to say they can drive and I think from memory
that it is only valid for 2yrs at a time.

There is a definate problem with this though. My mother is 78 and still has a drivers licence.
Doctors reason being is that "she doesn't drive far." Now my mother lives on the Gold Coast
and only 6 months ago drove to Darwin, I feel sorry for the dog in the back of the car the
poor little mutt must have been crapin the whole way there.
She is my mother and I love her dearly but she shouldn't be on the road, she is a danger.

Thankfully after numerous conversations over the last 18months or so I have finally convinced
her that she should sell the car and stop driving, Car is now on market I believe.
All this being said the Dr only just gave her another certificate 2 months ago so it is by my persuation
not the Dr saying she can't drive like he should have. :

[aussie muscle]

Originally Posted by buggo_gt

But yes, entriely agree with having a test after 60

My mother's driving is pretty scary. She is 77.

wasn't there a 'forgot which pedal was the brake' story not long ago with a pic of a car hanging half off the parking garage?

[Den76]

Originally Posted by loftie

Which is why you should have to review your license (or do a refresher course) every 5 years... every 2 years once you are over 60 perhaps?

I'm sure there is rules out there that I don't know or understand 100%... and i've only been driving for 12 years...

Fully agree, there are a lot of the elderly generation that need to get re tested to atleast prove their worthy of driving,
The unfortuant side is a lot of them depend soley on driving to carry out their day to day life and without there licence they will have to depend on other modes of transport (i.e public transport, community based transport or relatives) which will then require an upgrade to cope.

[AWD Chaser]

I wonder if the media reported on every "Forgot which Pedal" incident on elderly people instead of P platers crashing and hooning, how soon the government would identify it as a serious issue and address it....

[satria]

HE IS A HOOOOOON!!!!!!!!!

oh wait he is old so he isn't.

I'm confused, it is clearly a speed related incident possibly involving alcohol. Maybe he was drag racing the pedestrian?

I think he was hooning no matter what happened.

[Jason[98.EL]]

Originally Posted by satria

HE IS A HOOOOOON!!!!!!!!!

oh wait he is old so he isn't.

I'm confused, it is clearly a speed related incident possibly involving alcohol. Maybe he was drag racing the pedestrian?

I think he was hooning no matter what happened.

Where the hell did you get that it possibly involve alcohol or did I miss something in the artical.

I also agree with the thoughts that there should be testing done after a certain age but where do you set it at.

My wifes grandma is in her mid to late 80's but drives better than some of the younger generation so where would the age be set

[satria]

Originally Posted by Jason[98.EL]

Where the hell did you get that it possibly involve alcohol or did I miss something in the artical.

i was just rambling like the cops do when there is an accident reported in the news. Nobody knows what's happened yet they say stupid things like "it looks to be a crash possibly involving speed and alcohol". It could have involved a UFO for all they know but they always mention speed and alcohol.

[Bushbasher]

Been there, seen that...... actually I was hit by one of those. Pulled up outside a deli behind a crusty old dodderer in an EF, he had to be 90 if he was a day, and jumped out of the milk truck to ask him to move forward 1 space so I could get off the road properly ( I was delivering milk). I climbed back in the cab and waited; next thing I hear/see the car redline then suddenly smoke up and slam back into me so hard it snapped 5 of the 6 high tensile bolts holding my bullbar on and that was from just 4 feet away. This old fool was so slow to react he sat there for another 5 seconds smoking up the tyres against the front of the truck before he got off the throttle and moved forward again. He could barely walk ... well, shuffle really and was hard to understand as he stuttered and struggled to articulate properly and, as we exchanged details, my 4 year old had better hand writing he was shaking so much (and not from the crash either), maybe parkinsons or altzimers or something, I don't know. Yet 3 weeks later there he was, car fixed, pulling up outside the deli again to get his morning paper to my total disbelief. How he didn't get his licence revoked I'll never know.


Bushbasher

[XR6_661]

Poor old gaff.

[Road_Warrior]

These sorts of silly 'accidents' happen all too often and are laughed off or explained away with words like "mistake" but when someone gets injured or killed, what will happen then?

[buggo]

Wow this system is so flawed, why not give keys to a person with no arms.

[ltd]

Wow, I've seldom happened upon such a large ignorance extravaganza as this.
Judging by the posts of most of you whom have an obvious bias against the elderly you would consign over 3 million of the population to catching the bus because one aged man had an accident at a bunnings?
The obvious bias doesn't seem to end there either; the young "I'm a P plater and the cops pick on me for doing burnouts/speeding/idiotic behaviour" seems as though it is justification for vilifying a whole demographic.
Grow up people, if you manage to get out of your pre-pubescent state of ignorance you may too get old, and equally have young ignoramuses calling for you to turn in your licence just because you have reached a certain age.

[Franco Cozzo]

Originally Posted by ltd

Judging by the posts of most of you whom have an obvious bias against the young, you would consign over 3 million + of the population to driving crappy cars for 4 years because a few teenages killed their friends in their car?

I fixed it for you, but hey I don't complain?

Old people could hitch rides on the bus with their old people clubs to places, my 94 year old great grandma got her drivers license at 55 and stopped driving soon after, since then she's been getting around by taxi, busses and the oldies group.

[AWD Chaser]

Originally Posted by Big Damo

Judging by the posts of most of you whom have an obvious bias against the young, you would consign over 3 million + of the population to driving crappy cars for 4 years, wearing a P plate, driving below the speed limit, having less points then those on a full licence, getting their licence suspended on a first offence, not allowed to carry friends after certain hours, have a lower BAL because a few teenages killed their friends in their car?

Fixed again...

Maybe the elderly should have to wear an identification plate similar to the L and P plate...

[ltd]

Originally Posted by Big Damo

I fixed it for you, but hey I don't complain?

Old people could hitch rides on the bus with their old people clubs to places, my 94 year old great grandma got her drivers license at 55 and stopped driving soon after, since then she's been getting around by taxi, busses and the oldies group.

Nice attempt.
You failed to cite where I or anyone has said young people couldn't drive. :thebirds:

[Franco Cozzo]

Originally Posted by ltd

Nice attempt.
You failed to cite where I or anyone has said young people couldn't drive. :thebirds:

I didn't mean to cite where you or anyone mentioned young people can't drive, but I just put in a similar situation how a few people spoil it for everyone.

[snappy]

Poor fella he must be devasted by the fact he probly just realised he no longer has a place on the road .
I dont look forward to the time i will be unable to drive . Just lucky no one was hurt

[redxm]

This is all fine and dandy if you actually live in a place with public transport.
You shouldnt be made to hand in your licence because you reach a certain age. there should be regular driving tests for ALL drivers.
Not testing vision in Vic when you renew your licence - you are kidding right. We have to pass an eye test everytime we renew in NSW.
Time for national standards.

[mik]

perhaps not just oldies but general population should have a competancy test and medical every 5 years to keep the licence, you don`t have to be old to have illness that can have an effect on driving, diabetic, bi polar, epilepcy, demensia,alziemers, mental illness, all these road rage incents how many of these turkeys have a screw loose?

[ltd]

Originally Posted by mik

perhaps not just oldies but general population should have a competancy test and medical every 5 years to keep the licence, you don`t have to be old to have illness that can have an effect on driving, diabetic, bi polar, epilepcy, demensia,alziemers, mental illness, all these road rage incents how many of these turkeys have a screw loose?

Agreed. In aviation for private pilots you need a medical every 2 years. Commercial and ATPL pilots every year with a cardiogram every two. As for the ailments I agree as well, especially when it comes to the amount of aggression of most drivers.
For example, I have a mate who's bipolar. Or at least we think he's bipolar....... All we know is you can't get that silly pulling one.