0-100 kmph AU 6 & V8

**Stav** · 26-01-2005, 11:08 PM

http://www.mynrma.com.au/falcon-au-f...lcaufutura.asp

Interesting... to the AU 6 does 0-100 in 9.7 seconds.

Mine is doing 7 to 7.5 at the moment....how about others?

Casper · 26-01-2005, 11:16 PM

6.35 on a good day

Cheahman · 26-01-2005, 11:33 PM

Got a 7.6. But averged 7.7 - 7.8

Could have got better times if I messed around with it more trying different methods

JC · 26-01-2005, 11:35 PM

Around 8.5 for mine. (AU2 wagon, Pod & 3" intake, pacemakers + HF cat, but limited by standard cats back, ATM)

Kermit · 27-01-2005, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by useless

http://www.mynrma.com.au/falcon-au-f...lcaufutura.asp

Interesting... to the AU 6 does 0-100 in 9.7 seconds.

Mine is doing 7 to 7.5 at the moment....how about others?

They are referring to the Wagon, not a Sedan. Could this be the reason for the slower time?????

Casper · 27-01-2005, 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kermit

They are referring to the Wagon, not a Sedan. Could this be the reason for the slower time?????

yep. Wagons are a lot heavier. And Cheamans VCT is 100% stock.

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kermit

They are referring to the Wagon, not a Sedan. Could this be the reason for the slower time?????

Mine is a wagon.hehe alot of people dont realise...Same colour too.

loxxr6 · 27-01-2005, 09:26 AM

Did you guys G-tech your car's to the get ur times ?

Casper · 27-01-2005, 10:51 AM

mine is a calculation based on the 1/8 ET and MPH. Its pretty accruate, certainly as accruate as a GTech.

I'll actually do a GTech test soon in full road trim to see what difference it makes.

calculator is here: http://www.tweak3d.net/videos/calcs/sixty.shtml

Duffman · 27-01-2005, 11:44 AM

9.7 dam thats slow i thought it was in the 8's that the AU6 would do. This site
http://www.geocities.com/falconfacts...uiifalcon.html

Says 9.2 thats preety slow!!

Iv got a 2.5 inch exhaust and the tickford intake though I doubt this would brake the 9 barrier.

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blinkau

9.7 dam thats slow i thought it was in the 8's that the AU6 would do. This site
http://www.geocities.com/falconfacts...uiifalcon.html

Says 9.2 thats preety slow!!

Iv got a 2.5 inch exhaust and the tickford intake though I doubt this would brake the 9 barrier.

Hey the quarter mile in that article is 16.6 seconds.Assuming that I am geting a 0-100 in 7.6 seconds(1.6 seconds quicker than stock) would that mean I should be doing a flat 15 second 1/4 mile.? With the stock cam I was getting a flat 7 seconds so really I am .6 second slower with the cam...

Casper · 27-01-2005, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by useless

Hey the quarter mile in that article is 16.6 seconds.Assuming that I am geting a 0-100 in 7.6 seconds(1.6 seconds quicker than stock) would that mean I should be doing a flat 15 second 1/4 mile.? With the stock cam I was getting a flat 7 seconds so really I am .6 second slower with the cam...

No chance. Johnbays is a 15.6 second car and is not far off your power. 0-100 is one thing but 1/4 is a whole other kettle of fish Stav.

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

No chance. Johnbays is a 15.6 second car and is not far off your power. 0-100 is one thing but 1/4 is a whole other kettle of fish Stav.

Actually my power curves and JonBays curves are pretty identical.Give or take 1 or kw each way.So I would probably be closer to is times. Around 15.5 1/4 mile.

Good idea too lets start a list here of 0-100 and lets include the v8 powered cars too.

Dauphin · 27-01-2005, 01:12 PM

Before my AU2 Fairlane had the Unichip and shift kit, it did 8.1 seconds with just extractors and exhaust. Haven't had the chance to run it again. Anyone want to take a guess?

AU-MUSTD · 06-10-2005, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dauphin

Before my AU2 Fairlane had the Unichip and shift kit, it did 8.1 seconds with just extractors and exhaust. Haven't had the chance to run it again. Anyone want to take a guess?

Sorry to be off topic but was there a huge diff with the uni? and how much did it cost?

Casper · 06-10-2005, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AU-MUSTD

Sorry to be off topic but was there a huge diff with the uni? and how much did it cost?

The chips (uni or chiptorque) have a pretty dramatic difference. Most people that get them realise soon after that the dyno increase is not all that much (5 or 10rwkw) but the effect lower in the rev range is massive. So yes, 0-100 they make a big difference. So much so that those that have them are reluctant own a car without them again in most cases.

AU-MUSTD · 06-10-2005, 06:30 PM

Read your review on the chips casper and it was a great read but which did you end up sticking with?

EFFalcon · 27-01-2005, 01:21 PM

no it shouldn't....
who says your car did 9.2 when it WAS stock?
and did your car ever run a 16.6 when it was stock?

numbers on paper are different to numbers actually run by YOUR car.

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EFFalcon

no it shouldn't....
who says your car did 9.2 when it WAS stock?
and did your car ever run a 16.6 when it was stock?

numbers on paper are different to numbers actually run by YOUR car.

I need a nice long private road and the gtech 1/4 mile

EFFalcon · 27-01-2005, 01:28 PM

or you could goto a real drag strip and do it properly.
Gtech numbers are an estimate

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EFFalcon

or you could goto a real drag strip and do it properly.
Gtech numbers are an estimate

I have been assured that gtect times are an ants pube different from real track time.Very close actually.The power figures though are a bit out.

The other issue is that if there are Saturday or weekday morning meets at wsid I will give it a go.But they dont have any. Sunday at church and nights with the fam

neb · 27-01-2005, 01:56 PM

I think the g-tech times are pretty accurate... 0-100 seems to be spot on when i hit 100 and yeah seems right to me. and fairly consistent times... even with a manual. but still i wouldn't take quarter mile times as an official time. more just to give you an idea.

Casper · 27-01-2005, 02:35 PM

The list so far:

Casper 6.37 seconds (XR6)
Useless 7.50 seconds (wagon)
Cheahman 7.60 seconds (XR6)
Dauphin 8.1 seconds (pimp mobile)
JCXR8 8.5 seconds (wagon)

JC · 27-01-2005, 02:44 PM

Dauphin - the shift kit will save you about 0.1 at most. The uni chip may save you another 0.1 or 0.2. The reason for not much difference is that the autos still take off like they have never been modified. It's only once you get moving that mods seem to make a difference (hence better 1/4 mile times, but usually a good increase inthe terminal speed).

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCXR8

Dauphin - the shift kit will save you about 0.1 at most. The uni chip may save you another 0.1 or 0.2. The reason for not much difference is that the autos still take off like they have never been modified. It's only once you get moving that mods seem to make a difference (hence better 1/4 mile times, but usually a good increase inthe terminal speed).

Terminal power is used by many people as an indicator for 1/4 mile but I beg to differ!!! Loxxr6 has a power curve which has been maximisedto give good power figures throughout the rev range/speed range and power curve.His terminal power is around 146 rwkws but still managed a 14.6 quarter mile. Why??? Because he has bigger power on tap all the way from 60 to 160 kmph.The unichip has given the car a better state of tune. Not saying that termina speed is bad but maximising power below this is what has a big impact as well.

Casper · 27-01-2005, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by useless

Terminal speed is used by many people as an indicator for 1/4 mile but I beg to differ!!! Loxxr6 has a power curve which has been maximisedto give good power figures throughout the rev range/speed range and power curve.His terminal power is around 146 rwkws but still managed a 14.6 quarter mile. Why??? Because he has bigger power on tap all the way from 60 to 160 kmph.The unichip has given the car a better state of tune. Not saying that termina speed is bad but maximising power below this is what has a big impact as well.

His is also a manual Stav which means his ratios are closer and he sits in the powerband better. He's be grabbing 3rd gear near 100kph while the auto only grabs 3rd at about 130kph. Therefor he is making better use of the cars power curve itself.

**Stav** · 27-01-2005, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

His is also a manual Stav which means his ratios are closer and he sits in the powerband better. He's be grabbing 3rd gear near 100kph while the auto only grabs 3rd at about 130kph. Therefor he is making better use of the cars power curve itself.

ENTER THE 3.7!!!!!

:

Casper · 27-01-2005, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by useless

ENTER THE 3.7!!!!!

One day. I have spent a lot of time getting the launch on my car right but in the end the auto is going to be limited by 2 things.
1. Bad gearing in first gear
2. It sucks power. The faster you go the more the difference is from a manual.

I can stay with most cars to 80kph now but after that the auto and the lack of cubes start to take its toll.

Casper · 27-01-2005, 02:52 PM

Just curious JC, whats the XR8 0-100 time?

JC · 28-01-2005, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

Just curious JC, whats the XR8 0-100 time?

Best of 7.20 (did 3 runs, 7.21, 7.21 7.20). That's with 100kg of me in the car (of course), 3/4 tank juice, plus the crap I carry around in the boot and was measured by G-Tech.

I would be inetersted to get someone else to run their car using my G-Tech, just to see if the results are consistent. May have to tee that up with someone locally.