Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-08-2006, 10:48 AM   #1
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default What diff ratio?

I have decided i want to do the LSD conversion to the classic, but am unsure of what ratio i should get, or if i should change it at all? i have been getting conflicting advice on how high the car should rev at 100km/h on the freeway. I was under the impression that the higher it reved, the more fuel i will use, but have also been told that it should be reving at about 2500 so it breaths better?
just wanted to get some feedback on experience?

ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 03:06 PM   #2
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

i think i am going to go with 3.45 ratio, seems like a bit of a balance between takeoff and economy on the freeway. Thanks anyway
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 03:17 PM   #3
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

I would of gone with 3.7's or 3.9's personally..

theres next to no difference between the 3.45's and 3.7's from what ive felt in my car, 2/10ths if that.. and about 250rpm higher reving at speed.

I wish I went for the 3.9's to be honest.. at 110km/h now I sit on about 2350-2400rpm
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 04:01 PM   #4
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

thanks for that stiddy, thats what i was after. i havent confirmed it yet, i might do it next week so it has time to wear in before the aff nats. what is your car like day to day wise? does it make much of a difference when driving in trafic to the way the trans shifts at all?
cheers
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 04:41 PM   #5
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

Ive got a manual, but day to day driving you can barely notice it.

When you start playing silly buggers you can tell that the car is faster not a big difference though, mainly off the line.. 1st gear disappears on me in a blink, and 2nds not much slower..

and also, it seems to cruise better at lower speeds in top gear..

my car used to misbehave crusing at 80km/h in 5th, now I can cruise in 5th all day long from 70km/h onwards...
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 04:47 PM   #6
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

awesome, i was originally reccomended 3.7's but was a bit scared it was too low for day to day driving. but if its not all that bad, i might go that way if it will make it feel more responsive. but then anything is going to feel better than the 3.08 i have now!! do you remember how much it cost you to get done, if you dont mind me asking?
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 05:01 PM   #7
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

If you have an auto go for the 3.9's, I really recommend you do.
It will work so much better with the auto ratios. Huge improvement in acceleration, still be a very comfortable highway cruiser, and be a like a stock falcon in traffic.

It cost me $760.
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 06:04 PM   #8
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

stiddy have you noticed much difference in your weekly fuel consumption???
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 06:11 PM   #9
39ClevoUte
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
39ClevoUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
Default

Before you buy do some calcs.
Get your current gear box ratios and multipy each one by each of your possible diff ratios. This gives you the overall ratio of each combo in each gear.
What you will then notice is things like a 3.9 x 5th (say 0.8) may equal a 3.45 x 4th (say 1.0). This is why a 3.7 or a 3.9 will cruise happily in top at low speeds, because its the same a driving arround in 4th with a 3.45, except a 3.45 will still have one gear to go for ecconnomy.
The higher the ratio eg 3.9, the closer or less spread out the gear ratios become. So its a balance. Not much good having a first gear that is usless and an overdrive that is no longer doing its function.
Do the maths, ask more questions, no what you really are trying to achieve.

Also if you work out the rev difference for a given speed in top, take this number over your original revs at this speed and multiply this fraction plus 1.0, by your current fuel consumption, you will get very very close to what the end result will be.
39ClevoUte is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 07:49 PM   #10
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mik
stiddy have you noticed much difference in your weekly fuel consumption???
Yeah, heaps man.. only because I love launching the damn thing and taking out all of 1st and 2nd lol..

Being serious though, im getting more k's per tank since doing the diff gears..
I used to sit at 80 in 4th(because it didnt like crusing in 5th), now I sit on 80 in 5th at lower revs. I get to sit in 5th more often over 4th.. so lower revs is more fuel economy, well thats how it works in my car.
In peak hour traffic 1hr 30mins every morning and arvo on the way to and from work 5 days a week, I get 400k from a tank.. I used to get about 320-350. If im not in peak hr I get 550k's, used to get about 480-500k.. and on the highway my biggest tank so far is 935k from about 860k.

If I sit on 105-110km/h my car sips the fuel, if I sit on 115-120km/h it uses considerably more fuel.. strange, but that 5-10km/h makes a huge difference in how much I get out of a tank
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:02 PM   #11
Stav
Smile
 
Stav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Merrylands Sydney
Posts: 8,541
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always ready to help others over the years on AFF with advice and tips along the way 
Default

What Do You Want To Do With The Car?
__________________
Stingray Car Security ph 0414445444

Single din radio fascias for fg to fgx fords Australia wide .

FG 1 2 and 3 gauge holder in stock now! https://stingraycar.com.au/shop/
Site Sponsor See Sponsor Stingray Car Security 😍👌✌

AU wagon 6 14.241@96.75 1/4 mile sold.Octane fg xr6 turbo!! 12.312 112.21 mph home tune f6 injectors gone ..now in nitro fgxr6t ready to go again
Stav is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:20 PM   #12
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Would be interesting to see what it would be like on the ute as well ... i am sick of the auto being a dog down low ... it's rare for me to be out of the highway ... and a lot of my cruising is between 60-90km/h anyway.

That coupled with a few other things as well. hee hee
Also LSD might be handy too
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:51 PM   #13
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stiddy
If I sit on 105-110km/h my car sips the fuel, if I sit on 115-120km/h it uses considerably more fuel.. strange, but that 5-10km/h makes a huge difference in how much I get out of a tank
I've found exactly the same thing with my ute...fuel economy goes to crap when I cruise much above 110. Same before and after the gears.

I love my diff gears (3.9's), I wouldn't think twice about doing it again or recommending it to anyone else. Anyone want to swap some 4.11's for my 3.9's?

__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:53 PM   #14
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

So in other words it really does transform the ute ... even though it's a 99kw slug like mine????

I guess it will make it a hell of a lot more responsive in traffic than it is now.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:57 PM   #15
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechan1k
I guess it will make it a hell of a lot more responsive in traffic than it is now.
I found the most noticable and impressive difference was cruising around in city traffic in 4th (auto gearbox)....car feels much more responsive.

The shorter gear means there is more torque at the wheels at the same road speed.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 09:59 PM   #16
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Sounds good to me ... I hate having to wait for the sluggish auto to respond to downshifts when wanting to push away ... might actually be better for the auto in traffic as well ... less stress and load on it. And better for towing me thinks as well.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 10:13 PM   #17
I6corp
Was V6corp
 
I6corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechan1k
Sounds good to me ... I hate having to wait for the sluggish auto to respond to downshifts when wanting to push away ... might actually be better for the auto in traffic as well ... less stress and load on it. And better for towing me thinks as well.

Thats what ill tell the missus ;)
__________________
Car: 99 AU I Forte Sedan
Colour: Blue
Engine Mods: K&N Pod in a XR8 Pod Box; Performace fuel pump; 2 1/2" Exhaust
Planned Engine Mods: ; Extractors; Tickford CAI; Twin Mufflers; Shift Kit; Hi-Stall; Cam; ECU Flash
Bling Mods: Tinted Windows; JVC CD/DVD HU
Planned Bling Mods: TS50 Front; High Series bonnet; Rebel Skirts and Rear Bar; SL Springs; Clear Side Indicators; Rear Spolier; Mags
I6corp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 10:16 PM   #18
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I6corp
Thats what ill tell the missus ;)

Same here .... hee hee
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 10:19 PM   #19
FRDGAL
GT-P #0336
 
FRDGAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xr8ute

I love my diff gears (3.9's), I wouldn't think twice about doing it again or recommending it to anyone else.
Exactly what I was going to say. Would not change my decision to go 3.9's at all. And it's made stuff all differnece to economy but then it all depends on how I drive it :Up_to_som

But saying that, I had my reasons for wanting that particular gearing - the track. Suppose it all depends on what your reason is for doing yours really. If you're going with a complete LSD conversion, then I wouldn't even bother with 3.45. You may aswell go the whole deal and throw in some "fully sickness" lol.
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST
~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~
FRDGAL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2006, 10:26 PM   #20
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

I just want everyday better driveability in traffic and load pulling in the ute ... plus being underpowered and running on LPG with a tired auto transmission ... I think the 3.9s are sounding very good for me .... with a bit of highway work involved as well ... but mostly metro and outer metro driving .... and towing involved.

i don't need an exact gearset to get me over the 1/4 mile line at a certain amonut of revs, etc.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2006, 10:54 AM   #21
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by useless
What Do You Want To Do With The Car?
Thanks heaps for the feedback guys and gals!! all i am really after is a bit more pick-up down low. but my main reason for changing the diff is traction. i am getting well over spinning the inside tyre every time i try and go round a corner or want to punch it off the line! i was reccomended 3.7, and was initially scared by this, but its now starting to sound like the right way to go. as long as it doesnt change that car all that much day to day, and i get a bit more response, i will be happy! also, lsd is always fun every now and then!
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2006, 01:46 PM   #22
FRDGAL
GT-P #0336
 
FRDGAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClassicAU
but my main reason for changing the diff is traction.
Traction? Ohhh traction. Yeah I think I remember what that is :
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST
~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~
FRDGAL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2006, 10:21 PM   #23
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stiddy
Yeah, heaps man.. only because I love launching the damn thing and taking out all of 1st and 2nd lol..

Being serious though, im getting more k's per tank since doing the diff gears..
I used to sit at 80 in 4th(because it didnt like crusing in 5th), now I sit on 80 in 5th at lower revs. I get to sit in 5th more often over 4th.. so lower revs is more fuel economy, well thats how it works in my car.
In peak hour traffic 1hr 30mins every morning and arvo on the way to and from work 5 days a week, I get 400k from a tank.. I used to get about 320-350. If im not in peak hr I get 550k's, used to get about 480-500k.. and on the highway my biggest tank so far is 935k from about 860k.

If I sit on 105-110km/h my car sips the fuel, if I sit on 115-120km/h it uses considerably more fuel.. strange, but that 5-10km/h makes a huge difference in how much I get out of a tank
thanks stiddy thats the info i was after, mine is auto but cruisin around the burbs at 60 is too slow for overdrive i reckon, and apart from lugging with minimal revs it cant be good for the autos or the engine im thinking, cant be much line pressure for the auto at 1100/1200 revs in top gear i would imagine. cheers mik
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2006, 10:39 PM   #24
FS5
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 784
Default

i have recently changed to 3.9's in mine (5spd) .it sits on 2450 rpm @ 100kph ,with 225 /50 16inch tyres.on the hwy the econemy has gone from 750+ to around 650,around town i have picked up an extra 50 k's to the tank .i don't do much hwy driving so it's good for me. but when i'm out there and need to overtake i don't have to change back to 4th just put the foot down and go roun them .another bonus is, if you tow things it makes a huge difference with the shorter gears. so much easier to pull things.
if you dont do much freeway stuff i wouldn't put changing to 4.11's off the list either.
FS5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 12:32 PM   #25
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRDGAL_AU6
Exactly what I was going to say. Would not change my decision to go 3.9's at all. And it's made stuff all differnece to economy but then it all depends on how I drive it :Up_to_som

But saying that, I had my reasons for wanting that particular gearing - the track. Suppose it all depends on what your reason is for doing yours really. If you're going with a complete LSD conversion, then I wouldn't even bother with 3.45. You may aswell go the whole deal and throw in some "fully sickness" lol.
Hi Krissy, i think your right when you mentioned what you wanted to do with the car helping you decide on the ratio. i am not looking to turn it into a track monster, so i would like to keep it civilised. can i ask, with the 3.9, does your car break traction too easily? i have pretty much decided to go 3.7's but i was told that with 235/45/17 tyres that i could get away with 3.9's. i am just not sure, it sounds a bit low to me for every day use.
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 03:03 PM   #26
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClassicAU
can i ask, with the 3.9, does your car break traction too easily?
I hardly break traction with 3.9's in my V8.

If you want that urge off the line, from a standing start, then you want a higher stall converter not shorter diff gears. A higher stall converter will make traction "tricky" from a standing start with too much throttle ;)
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 05:09 PM   #27
FRDGAL
GT-P #0336
 
FRDGAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClassicAU
can i ask, with the 3.9, does your car break traction too easily?
It does BUT bear in mind the mods to my car though compared to your car. I got a bit of power being put to the ground. And I have a 2800 stall in mine. Plus it all depends on how I play the throttle too. Some days I take off slower than a 180B lol, other days it's outta control.

So basically, yes. But that's my car. I've never driven a stocko with 3.9's in it so I don't know what effect it would have. Since you want to keep it civilised, then go with the 3.7's. It'll give you a decent punch off the mark and you'll still retain fairly good economy, especially if you do freeway driving.
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST
~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~
FRDGAL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 06:51 PM   #28
ClassicAU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRDGAL_AU6
So basically, yes. But that's my car. I've never driven a stocko with 3.9's in it so I don't know what effect it would have. Since you want to keep it civilised, then go with the 3.7's. It'll give you a decent punch off the mark and you'll still retain fairly good economy, especially if you do freeway driving.
Thanks heaps Krissy! I think i will go the 3.7 as you sugested. I dont want to go as far as stall converters ir anything like that, i would like to keep its all unopened. Hopefully i will be getting the diff in this week, depending on how i go for time with work and all. I want to get it as soon as i can so i have a few weeks to run it in before the aff nationals! :sm_headba
ClassicAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 08:40 PM   #29
GK
Walking with God
 
GK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,321
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 54Ghia
Before you buy do some calcs.
Get your current gear box ratios and multipy each one by each of your possible diff ratios. This gives you the overall ratio of each combo in each gear.
What you will then notice is things like a 3.9 x 5th (say 0.8) may equal a 3.45 x 4th (say 1.0). This is why a 3.7 or a 3.9 will cruise happily in top at low speeds, because its the same a driving arround in 4th with a 3.45, except a 3.45 will still have one gear to go for ecconnomy.
The higher the ratio eg 3.9, the closer or less spread out the gear ratios become. So its a balance. Not much good having a first gear that is usless and an overdrive that is no longer doing its function.
Do the maths, ask more questions, no what you really are trying to achieve.

Also if you work out the rev difference for a given speed in top, take this number over your original revs at this speed and multiply this fraction plus 1.0, by your current fuel consumption, you will get very very close to what the end result will be.
Good advice!

GK
__________________
2009 Mondeo Zetec TDCi - Moondust Silver

2015 Kia Sorento Platinum - Snow White Pearl

2001 Ducati Monster 900Sie - Red

Now gone!
1999 AU1 Futura Wagon - Sparkling Burgundy
On LPG



Want a Full Life? John 10:10
GK is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-08-2006, 09:45 PM   #30
39ClevoUte
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
39ClevoUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
Default

Take FS5's example.
750 reduced to 650 on the highway. This is a 13% reduction in economy. Because his engine is now turning 13% more revs than before. However at low low speed, in the burbs he claims an extra 50ks per tank. Let's assume in the burbs he normally gets get's 400ks per tank, with the new gears he gets 450ks, this relates to a 12.5% increase in economy.
You can see by this it all depends where you are doing your K's .

In FS5's example (highway driving) we can assume he had a 3.45 ratio diff initially, by (assuming his 750 to 650k's is accurate):
At 100k his engine was spinning at 2450 with a 3.9 diff, therefore the wheels were spinning at 628rpm (2450 divided by 3.9)
Since his total k's went down by 13%, with a 3.9, his original diff must have caused the motor to spin 13% slower, so: The wheels still need to spin at 628 but the motor needs to spin 13% slower at 2168, 2168 divided by 628 = 3.45. Therefore, if the facts given by FS5 were accurate and assuming highway driving is relatively efficient the original diff ratio was 3.45.

So why does this same change give better Ks in the burbs??? Why does the maths not work for the burbs???
Simple....labouring.....read all the above and (apart from burnouts) everyone talks about not labouring in top gear or top gear now being sporty, same thing.

Again using maths (and assuming your not after burn outs or towing a Mac truck) you can work out the following:

Assume FS5 has a 5 speed box with the following ratios maultiplied by 3.45 and 3.9 and 4.11:

5 speed 3.45 3.9 4.11
Overall ratios 1st 3.35 11.56 13.07 13.77
2nd 1.92 6.62 7.49 7.89
3rd 1.29 4.45 5.03 5.30
4th 1 3.45 3.90 4.11
OD 0.72 2.48 2.81 2.96
Speed at 2168 1st 3.35 21 19 18
2nd 1.92 38 33 31
3rd 1.29 56 49 47
4th 1 72 64 60
OD 0.72 100 88 84
Speed at 2000 1st 3.35 20 17 17
2nd 1.92 34 30 29
3rd 1.29 51 45 43
4th 1 66 58 55
OD 0.72 92 82 77
Max revs 5500 1st 3.35 55 48 46
2nd 1.92 95 84 80
3rd 1.29 142 125 119
4th 1 183 162 153
OD 0.72 254 224 213
Revs at 60 1st 3.35 >5500 >5500 >5500
2nd 1.92 3469 3921 4132
3rd 1.29 2331 2635 2776
4th 1 1807 2042 2152
OD 0.72 1301 1470 1550

(bugger I can't get this table to display right)

Studying this data is interesting. Note that in 4th with a 4.11 diff at 60ks is like driving in 3rd with 3.45's. Note also that none of the diff ratios really suits driving in OD at 60ks.

Moral is for fuel economy in the burbs drive in lower gears and don't labour motor. Unless you want to do burn outs and tow Mac trucks in which case a 4.11 is the only way to go.
39ClevoUte is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL