Alternative Fuels

[Mayhem_07]

I'm not much for conspiracy theories... but this makes logical sense.

Check out these links and have a look at the youtube vids.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Water_Fuel_Cell

http://pesn.com/2007/09/29/9500450_...trolizer_Plans/

http://www.panaceauniversity.org/


Before anyone says it's rubbish I know of 2 people, one professional mechanic in QLD (ran his car safely for 5 years) and one legal guru in VIC that built and ran their cars on a system that converted water to hydrogen as needed in the car. Neither person knows each other but they both built similar system from the ideas gained on those sites. Both cars were impounded by the supposed RTA in each state.

These cars did not use what is termed a hydroxy booster which runs petrol and hydrogen, only hydrogen.

The bloke in VIC being a legal guru in corporate law did some digging and found rumours that either legislation has been or is being written (by major petrol and car manufacturers) to make sure that:
a) hydrogen is not allowed to be produced in the car
b) must be produced in a secure location

This means, instead of filling up with tap water/grey water @ $0/L (close enough) or petrol at $8/L (as a 10 year prediction) we will probably be paying $2/L for hydrogen to put into tanks which will still looks cheap compared to petrol.

The reason I believe this is true, and this obviously isn't just me as it is fairly logical... is that they are doing this to protect a multi billion dollar industry and several hundreds of jobs. If it was a few hundred dollars I would believe it to be false, but obviously there's a lot of money to lose.

Personally I would rather have the option to run my car for free and make the fuel companies compete with free energy the same way Microsoft competes with Linux. Surely anything else should be seen as anti competitive behaviour.

If nothing else those sites make for some interesting reading.