|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-10-2009, 05:15 PM | #1 | ||
Compulsive Hobbiest
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
|
Just an interesting statistic, for the sake of overhead cost illustration....
Eight years ago in 2001 Ford had 145,000 laborers in the US. Today in 2009 there are only 46,000 laborers, a reduction of 90,000 jobs. It took closing 17 plants to do this as well. 17 less plants 90,000 less workers (62%) ---------------------- = a LOT less overhead Yup, it's a new Ford. This was done without bankruptcy. Also, Ford's hourly labor cost is practically equal with Toyota's now, and Toyota only has hundreds of retirees to Ford's hundreds of thousands. Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website Latest Project: Musclin' My XB Interceptor project Wife's 1966 Mustang My Artworks and Creative Projects Site Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture, Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos, and more! |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|