Need help making the distinction

[stockstandard]

This is regarding this announcement: http://www.fordforums.com.au/announc...ouncementid=14

Could someone please make the distinction between a legitimate questions and puerile speculation/questioning integrity.

Not wanting to restart the futile argument again, but I would have though with the supporting evidence in the threads that brought this on, and response from the sponsor, that it is not unreasonable to question the results that were posted.

I know this puts the admin team in a difficult place (between sponsors and members), but it seems that many were very quick to attack anyone who questioned a sponsor, even though there was a legitimate reason to question what was being posted.

I’m not sure if this is the right place for the issue to be brought up, but considering the number of people involved (many who I suspect are as frustrated as I am), an open discussion seems the best way to clear things up.

Mark.