Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo
I agree with ****ing off 91 and then looking at ultra low sulfur fuels in 95/98.
Further we should increase availability of E85 and flexfuel capable vehicles and look at a retrofit program for existing vehicles.
It supports local farmers, reduces some of our reliance on foreign oil and it's a low hanging fruit goal towards reducing C02 emissions.
Removal of 91, ultra low sulfur 95/98 can be done with a change of Australian standards.
As far as ADRs go, what do we need that European, Japanese, South Korean and American design regulations don't have?
Gone with the ADRs, if car manufacturers want to offer cars in our market without various safety features then let the market decide.
I don't want **** like AEB and lane guidance crap, I'll use my own brakes and keep my car in its lane by itself thanks.
|
E85 is an environmental con from what I know. Producing it generates more pollution than it saves.
I think our ADR's have things that may be included in either Euro, US or Jap standards, but probably not all 3 at the same time.
There are specific things like headlights etc that has something to do with the crown in our roads?