You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.
You mean the "referendums" facilitated by a hostile occupying force where armed Russian troops escorted election officials door to door and observed people voting? Well, they were literally in violation of the Constitution of Ukraine, international humanitarian and human rights laws, and the UN charter.
Sham enough for you?
If not, probably also violate the Hague Regulations (1907) and the Geneva Convention.
Very telling that the only sovereign nation to recognise the results of the sham was North Korea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3rminator
Gotta wonder if the "millions" flocking in from the south realise they could be conscripted under the S S S.
Doubt they give it any thought. Do you really think that if NATO were to be drawn into taking defensive action in Ukraine that the US or any other NATO country would need to resort to conscription? I seriously cannot see it.
Again, I know his videos are a long death by PowerPoint, but if you were to watch just the 2-3 minutes on 'Manpower' from 16 minutes 40-odd seconds you would see that troop numbers are unlikely to be an issue for NATO (watch the full vid and you will see it is equipment and ammo that could need solution).
31-10-2022, 09:49 PM
Re: Russia v Ukraine
Threaded Mode