Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27-11-2008, 12:56 PM   #10
Bud Bud
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fev
in reply to Bud Bud:

of course i read the article, i just viewed it in a difference way. there is so many difference ways to interpret what is said in these articles.
We dont have any way of knowing, say - If how long after the accident the macas was delivered etc etc - hell they could have been on their way to see them with the food or something. i never take news articles at face value and i will always have more questions that need answering. i like to keep an open unbiased mind on things like this because it is so easy to jump to conclusions with the information that is provided and im not going to crucify someone before enough information is found.


The real point of the article should have been 5 guys, unregisted car, uninsured, unlicensed, unable to drive said "highpowered" car with a license at that age anyway and what is being done to help curb this sort of person on the road. Other then the crash anyway which in itself isn't HUGE HEADLINE worthy news(i know it sounds horrible but its true)
I take you point, and I said please don't take it the wrong way.

But to me the article really shows some peoples frustration in this case the local residence that attended the scene as being angry for the non caring blas'e attitude towards other people in distress. This is what has upset everyone. This was also without the prior knowledge of the string of offences that you have quite rightly pointed out that this particular individual has already wracked up. What would the residence have reported if they were armed with that little nugget of information?

I have seen two separate fatalities (not directly involved in) years apart and the last thing I thought of was Maccas, but I guess everyone is different.
Bud Bud is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL