|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
| View Poll Results: Read poll question in first post. | |||
| Falcon |
   
|
93 | 42.08% |
| Mustang |
  
|
128 | 57.92% |
| Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-08-2009, 07:43 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
It's something I keep thinking about; If Mustang was offered alongside it's
performance four door distant cousin, would it be more desirable to own? Assuming both had same driveline/chassis/price/power/quality, i.e., no arguments about live axles and which has better power to weigh ratio, the question is more about the two different cars. The poll question is not about whether you think the Mustang will survive in this market, nor is it about the Falcon/GT brand being too strong. It's about what YOU would rather have as a performance car. Examples. XR8 or Mustang GT? Mustang with Ecoboost V6, or F6? A supercharged FPV GT, or Shelby GT500? Which is it for you, the Mustang or the Falcon? We too familiar with the Falcon, so here are some shots of the Mustang.       
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett. |
||
|
|
Mustang or Falcon
Threaded Mode