Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 25-09-2009, 10:51 AM   #15
kircher
Regular Member
 
kircher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orange, NSW
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkbits
I think some of you are looking into it far too deeply and seem to be a little paranoid.
I think the "paranoia" that some of us are displaying stems from wanting to know more of what potential this technology has. As I said before, if it makes it easier to spot people that are actually DOING the wrong thing, then fine (no pun intended). My issues are the potential for what I would call misuse.

If it means that people would be targeted for non-random checks because they have one point left, or because they were drink driving 5 years ago when they were 17 - 18, or even if they have a non-driving record, eg posession of a small quantity of marijuana etc, then this is cause for concern.

That would be one step closer to the aforementioned police state that I hope no one wants. Believe it or not, every new law that restricts us further, just adds to the bureaucracy, and restricts civil liberties even further. We want smaller government, not bigger. Also it is our responsibility, not just a right to challenge such things that the government plans to enforce without consultation periods. The government is supposed to represent the people, not control them. I am getting off topic slightly, but my point is that this technology has the very real potential to be used in the wrong way.
kircher is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL