|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-04-2011, 01:04 PM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,412
|
With Ford Australia announcing that they are seeking voluntary redundancy
for 240 workers and down balancing the line speed from 260/day to 209/ day, are we being too harsh and critical of Ford Australia? Like others on here over the past week, I've vented my anger/frustration at the disappointingly low Falcon sales of late and perhaps that is colouring perspective of the bigger picture and long term outlook for Ford Australia. Maybe things are nowhere near as bleak as they appear..... At present the plant line speed is set at 260/day but running three days a week so by going back to 209/day a full five day working week will return and if things improve, maybe there will be overtime on hand to build additional units. Scenario 1: If Falcon sales don't improve in the immediate future, the workforce will still has sufficient vehicles to build when Falcon-Ute-Territory are combined Scenario 2: If Falcon sales do recover and additional production time is required to build say, Territory then that can be done in overtime on Saturdays. Four extra Saturdays would enable another 800 odd vehicles to be made, it's possible that Ford could find itself working more days than it thinks... Few if any on here would know what the minimum limit of viability is for Broadmeadows but by the way Ford are prepared to make changes, it looks like they are prepared to wait out this low point in sales and back their new products and engines that are coming progressively over the next six to nine months. This is probably the best form of cost control open to FoA and shows they are not prepared to throw in the towel just yet on their products, maybe they know something about coming trends we don't... Perhaps Ford Head office likes the way FoA are managing costs and is prepared to back FoA more than we can ever imagine, what if they actually like what they see in regards to use of resources in a tough market, what if they absolutely love some of the local vehicle plans FoA are developing........ Your thoughts.... |
||