First drive - Ecoboost!!

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by 4.0i OHC

Yes, it may be an improvement, but it's still not quite up to the standard of the Watts link. The main reason I am so sore about Control Blade IRS is because it was essentially Ford's way of engineering an IRS that they could build on the cheap so that they could fit it to every Falcon sedan for marketing reasons. It was rather uncharacteristic of Ford to do something like this; it's what you'd expect from Holden (who shouted out from the rooftops that their cars had standard IRS, even though the system was far inferior to the Falcon's standard live axle in almost all aspects). As well as this, it tarnished the Falcon's 'unbreakable' image (although other aspects of the BA contributed to this as well). Yes, Control Blade IRS has improved, but it's still not up to the standard of a well sorted live axle in all areas except ride quality (as seen in the 1982-2002 Falcon).

I think you're creating problems that don't exist in normal operation, fleet managers I've spoken to
mostly consider the difference between Ford and Holden IRS as insignificant and basically irrelevant in terms of
maintenance issues. The only people mentioning bushes are taxi operators and Hi perf I-6T and V8 owners.

I also tend to repeat myself in posts a lot. I can't help it. I really want a manual Mondeo, I would much rather the Falcon still had a Watts link, I believe the inline six is one of the best engines (if not the best engine) ever fitted to a family car, and I'm still sore about Ford replacing a best in class small car with one which doesn't stand out from the pack.

Mostly reasonable except for the criticism of latest Focus, that car is selling its tail of with constrained volume.

My beef is that FoA should be controlling volume by building Mondeo here with our own supply of Ecoboost and diesels.