|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-05-2012, 11:30 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
|
There may be a simple answer to this but I will ask anyway. I just looked at an E10 thread and the contradictions are hard to believe much less understand. Seems like some people pull ideas out of the hole in the back of their head and present them as Gospel. I drive occasionally to Beaudesert, QLD. 830Ks approximately, Using E10 before I found out what it could do to my fuel system(Ford info) I had to carry a 20 liter container (which actually held 26 liters) to make the trip. After professional advice from Ford, I switched to 91 ulp which is the fuel the car is tuned for. I no longer had to carry the 26 liters of extra fuel but I carried a 10 liter jerry can of 91 just in case. the car now makes it to Beaudesert on just over 60 liters instead of over 70 liters. Can there really be that much difference? My new dilemma is that I am told by FF members in threads and posts that 91 is going the way of the Dodo. Where do I go from from here. 95? The Telstar will not run on 98. Pings (pre-ignition) Moped is out of the question.
|
||
|
|
another E10 question
Threaded Mode