|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-01-2014, 02:48 PM | #26 | ||
I miss my wheelbarrow
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bluestreak Performance
Posts: 11,503
|
I dont believe the emissions cost would have been much at all... you could tune for stoich and Ethanol would burn cleaner BEFORE you added any timing I promise you.
Plus they run an optical sensor in the return line to manage the injector duty cycle at various % of Ethanol in the tank... Holden would have an easier time doing the calibration on an AFM/E85 badged car than your local SCT tuner would as he has to tune to whats in the tank on the day, Holden have a sensor telling the ECM how much Ethanol is in there. Look at all the aftermarket companies selling Flex Fuel add-on kits out there.. doing it with next to no budget! Daniel |
||
This user likes this post: |