|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30-11-2014, 07:57 PM | #16 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,070
|
Quote:
There's a reason why they were defined under the legislation as scientific instruments, so they wouldn't have to prove they were working correctly, YOU would have to prove they weren't. If you're certain you weren't speeding, the first step is usually to request calibration logs/results. Friend got off when they requested these under FOI, but the police failed to produce them. As far as arguing the physics, it will cost you more to get an expert witness to appear on your behalf than the fine. Even though common sense says two vehicles in frame and yours not the central one should create sufficient doubt, it will still be up to you to prove the reading was erroneous. |
|||