|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-05-2016, 12:02 PM | #11 | |||
Long live the GT !
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 1,863
|
Quote:
It's possible even those Pirelli 265's are too narrow for the Sprint's 650Nm... Cars with similar torque outputs like the Jag F-type and AMG GT are both fitted with 295 section rubber. But again, the title of this thread should be $63k XR8 vs $83k HSV, so people can see where their money is going... and we probably won't even see the XR8 Sprint tested against it's direct competitor, the 304kW SS-V as the results would be too embarrassing for Holden ;)
__________________
2018 Ford Mustang GT - Oxford White | Auto | Herrod Tune | K&N Filter | StreetFighter Oil Separators | H&R Springs | Whiteline Vertical Links | Ceramic Protection | Tint "Whatya think of me car, XR Falcon, 351 Blown Cleveland running Motec injection and runnin' on methanol... goes pretty hard too, got heaps of torque for chucking burnouts, IT'S UNREAL !!" - Poida
Last edited by Bent8; 06-05-2016 at 12:02 PM. Reason: typo |
|||
This user likes this post: |