Russia v Ukraine

[T3rminator]

Originally Posted by Mulva

Like this article of his from just 2 months prior to the invasion, where he says Russia will not invade and it is all a crisis being manufactured by the US and NATO who were over-reacting to Russia's build-up of forces on Ukrainian border: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/542214-russ...-ukraine-nato/

lol im not here to have a tit for tat with you on this guy. No one is infallible. No body has been able to predict all that has transpired with 100% accuracy.
If there is another source out there, with similar experience, who is willing to break down the analysis into logical steps, and share it with the public, I'll happily listen. I'm interested in piecing all this together, not barracking for a side.

He got Mariupol right, when until recently, the popular opinion was that the Russians would be pushed back. And unlike what we've been told, his opinion from the beginning was that Kiyv and Kharkiv was not a primary objective (I think?), that now seems about right. He has said Donbas is the objective, lets see what transpires.

Very easy to nit pick on what is a very fast moving and complex scenario. Plenty got it wrong from the start, even on this side of the ledger.

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2...invade-ukraine

https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/artic...e-ukraine-soon

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60468264

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blog...nvade-ukraine/

Originally Posted by Mulva

I know two electricians with same qualification and same number of years experience as each other - yet one is very much better at their job than the other. To me, Ritter is starting to look like the sparky most likely to electrocute himself

I bet you the other sparky is still more qualified than some journo or AFF member sitting on the other side of the planet with no electrical experience.