|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19-10-2022, 08:15 PM | #1 | ||
DIY Tragic
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 22,451
|
That rotten W126, but it’s a more general question about which approach is most likely to suit.
Exhibit A, the window motor and reduction gear assembly. Due to heavy loading of the system, I desire to open the housing and renew the old, dry/stiff greasing. There’s four peened securing points holding the plate steel cover onto the cast alloy housing. To get it apart, I’ll need to counterbore them. When re-fixing, with basic bench facilities including a Chinese drill press, is it going to be smarter (less risky) to drill for tap-tite style screws, or drill and tap? I think the thread would either be M3 or M4. I have to process at least three motors, possibly all four; that’s 12-16 holes where failure isn’t an option. |
||