Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub
Reload this Page 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T vs. 2010 Ford...
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-03-2009, 10:26 PM   #1
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T vs. 2010 Ford...
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._gt/index.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-uTjaQ6E7g

It appears the Camaro SS is the winner in this comparo. Coyote ought to fix that.

I'm kind of impressed with the new GT's acceleration times, which should improve quite a bit when it gets the new 5L.

__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 10:12 AM   #2
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,706
Default
Those yanks get awesome times out of their cars. 4.9 0-60 for the Mustang is brilliant. Coyote will make it a lot faster. I was surprised to see the Dodge Challanger only get the 5.7litre. I thought it was supposed to have the 6.1L?? Would have been a much better comparo if that was the case.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 11:17 AM   #3
Daymoe
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,082
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra
Those yanks get awesome times out of their cars. 4.9 0-60 for the Mustang is brilliant. Coyote will make it a lot faster. I was surprised to see the Dodge Challanger only get the 5.7litre. I thought it was supposed to have the 6.1L?? Would have been a much better comparo if that was the case.
SRT8 has the 6.1L
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EviLkarL
How about you start your trip at the Christmas Island Refugee and detention centre. After a short 6 year stay you can turn around and go back to where you came from. lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourbastard
ive got the weight gain bit mastered, Colonel Sanders is my personal trainer.

As to weight loss, nah, im a fat bastard and proud of it, im going to die from a massive heart attack, for theres nothing worse then lying around in hospital dying from nothing.
Daymoe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 12:16 PM   #4
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default
Why is the mustang Gt so, well, retrained in the power stakes? 230kw's is fairly low, when our own XR8 has 290kw...
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 12:37 PM   #5
Powdered Toast Man
Professional Mouse Jockey
 
Powdered Toast Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SE Vic
Posts: 3,185
Default
The Mustang has almost a litre less capacity and doesn't have quad cams thats why it is "only" 315hp.

Jeez remember the days when 300hp was a high power output for a V8....
__________________
Isuzu MUX for towing horses - currently no Fords in the stable

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. Groucho Marx
Powdered Toast Man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 02:16 PM   #6
Transfiguring R
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Perth, W.A.
Posts: 422
Default
Mustang had a 4.6 litre engine, Challenger had a 5.7 litre Hemi, and the Camaro had the 6.2 litre LS3 in it.

The mustang had the smallest engine by over a litre. Mustang was also the lightest of the three...
Transfiguring R is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 07:31 PM   #7
Bad Bird
Watts a panhard.
 
Bad Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Default
Look which car performed the best on the skidpan. 0.95g for the Mustang!

I've been saying it for years - the live rear axle is not necessarily a bad thing. Simple, can dial in good Anti-Squat, no stupid camber gain under acceleration...
Bad Bird is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 07:43 PM   #8
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Bird
Look which car performed the best on the skidpan. 0.95g for the Mustang!

I've been saying it for years - the live rear axle is not necessarily a bad thing. Simple, can dial in good Anti-Squat, no stupid camber gain under acceleration...
Skidpans are usually totally smooth, so live axles aren't usually disadvantaged, and the considerably lower weight of the Mustang makes a massive difference.

On a bumpy road IRS takes the advantage back.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 08:25 PM   #9
Bad Bird
Watts a panhard.
 
Bad Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Default
Yes, I will concede that the handling is not as good on a bumpy surface... like most of the roads around here...
Bad Bird is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 08:33 PM   #10
smciner1
Detroit Locker Equiped TM
 
smciner1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Area 51 (tm)
Posts: 4,928
Thumbs up
A great read.
__________________
Apollo Blue 1974 XB Falcon GT, 557 HP
Blue Pearl 2004 BA FPV GT, 290 kW

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRJUCY
Simple give the car a rev & have a listen a Windsor makes a sort of wheezy drone similar to an angry Hugh Grant when a Clevo will sound like Satan has woke up with a hangover & realized he is out of coffee & cigarettes
Falcon GT Club of Geelong.
http://www.facebook.com/FalconGTClubGeelong
smciner1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2009, 11:25 PM   #11
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,706
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daymoe
SRT8 has the 6.1L
Yeah fair enough. I guess what I meant was that I didn't know they were releasing any Challengers that weren't SRT8's. It would have been a much better comparo if the SRT8 was used instead.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-03-2009, 04:52 AM   #12
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default
I think the interior in the Challenger looks really boring. So I would go the Camaro or the Mustang, and I would only consider the Stang with the 5.0.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-03-2009, 09:31 AM   #13
smciner1
Detroit Locker Equiped TM
 
smciner1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Area 51 (tm)
Posts: 4,928
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra
Yeah fair enough. I guess what I meant was that I didn't know they were releasing any Challengers that weren't SRT8's. It would have been a much better comparo if the SRT8 was used instead.
They do the Challenger in 3 Trim Levels:-

SE V6 Auto only
R/T 5.7 Manual and Auto
SRT-8 6.1 Manual and Auto
__________________
Apollo Blue 1974 XB Falcon GT, 557 HP
Blue Pearl 2004 BA FPV GT, 290 kW

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRJUCY
Simple give the car a rev & have a listen a Windsor makes a sort of wheezy drone similar to an angry Hugh Grant when a Clevo will sound like Satan has woke up with a hangover & realized he is out of coffee & cigarettes
Falcon GT Club of Geelong.
http://www.facebook.com/FalconGTClubGeelong
smciner1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Australian Ford Forums - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL