|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-08-2012, 12:03 AM | #1 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
anyone found or read any comparos for the new colorado yet. All ive seen is silly rants focusing on one strong point..the towing capacity...and thats it. I just cant believe how many of these things have been sold...im thinking it has to be verrry good. im not even sure it has a 5 star safety rating. I spose looks are subjective but i dont think it looks tuff at all.
id be very interested in how it goes v the ranger amarok and the hilux and navara |
||
08-08-2012, 02:38 AM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
|
God I would hate to tow 3.5 tonne with that thing. It would be unbearable, not to mention hardly move up a hill, and the fuel consumption would be horrendous.
|
||
08-08-2012, 04:29 AM | #3 | |||
Owner of "0066" F6 310
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Australia
Posts: 836
|
Quote:
Ive had the chance to have a good look over a top of the range colorado and also a quickish drive and i must say the Ranger/BT50 leave it for dead in interior presentation etc. Performance wise (auto V's auto) they feel pretty similar but on road dynamics is a big win to the Ranger, BT50 and Amarok. Looks are subjective but i reckon the new Isuzu Dmax (the colorado's twin) looks better than the GM product but i still rate the Ranger (especially in XLT/Wildtrak models) and the top of the range Amarok as the lookers of the new bunch.
__________________
Red - FG F6
|
|||
08-08-2012, 08:13 AM | #4 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: QLD Townsville
Posts: 389
|
i saw 1 on the rd the other day ewww the D-max looks better
__________________
HTFU!!!! |
||
08-08-2012, 08:24 AM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
|
What is it with the "american" truck styling???
I dont understand why these utes are just getting bigger and bigger to the point where they are mini-trucks and you need a step ladder to load them up! Look at the difference between the orginal Ford Ranger and the current model which has morfed into an F series truck!
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions?? Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole.... |
||
08-08-2012, 08:30 AM | #6 | ||
normality is boring
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Up in the hills on the QLD/NSW boarder
Posts: 1,803
|
Why would anyone consider a colorado, the dmax is a better deal and as for the class leading towing capacity, doesnt the current navara have a similar towing capacity in the current model which has been around for many years?
__________________
Factory v8 with turbonetics 67mm turbo, haltech ecu, aeromotive and raceworks fuel system, cobra intake and a few custom bits thrown in |
||
08-08-2012, 08:47 AM | #7 | ||
Owner of "0066" F6 310
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Australia
Posts: 836
|
Current D40 Navara has a 3000kg towing capacity which is same as the old model Ranger/BT50 had.
The only issue with the new Dmax is its still running the old previous models engine and is mated to either a 5 speed manual (same as new colorado) or 5 speed auto gearbox. It does look better than the colorado though.
__________________
Red - FG F6
|
||
08-08-2012, 09:28 AM | #8 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,301
|
Quote:
And compared to an F-series, the new Ranger is still significantly shorter (by 530mm) and narrower (137mm). The wheel base is 457mm shorter, so it may look a big F-series, its still quite small compared to one.
__________________
2012 PX Chilli Orange Wildtrak, 2006 SY Territory TS AWD, 1974 HQ Ute & 1964 Fairlane 500 |
|||
08-08-2012, 03:07 PM | #9 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mexico Vic
Posts: 356
|
Ive ordered a 2.8 6spd auto Colorado,ive driven some and liked them.Just taking its damn time getting made.What ***** me is you cant get all the colours if you order a 2wd.There is only a choice of four.
Time to retire the AU |
||
08-08-2012, 05:28 PM | #10 | ||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
All the reviews i've read so far point to it being an inferior vehicle to the Ranger, BT50 and VW. These 3 moved the game on by a whole generation in terms of the way they drive, whereas the Colorado drives like the old ones did.
|
||
08-08-2012, 06:03 PM | #11 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
Quote:
|
|||
08-08-2012, 06:08 PM | #12 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Quote:
|
|||
08-08-2012, 06:58 PM | #13 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mexico Vic
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
|
|||
08-08-2012, 07:02 PM | #14 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mexico Vic
Posts: 356
|
Didnt know the Amarok was coming out in a single cab either.Ive ordered a 2wd single cab.
|
||
08-08-2012, 07:34 PM | #15 | ||
Mad Scientist!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 2,874
|
I read, maybe care sales/carsguide that has very floaty suspension, not as nice to sit in, inferior plastics used. They compared Hilux, Ranger, BT50, Amarok, Colarado.
|
||
08-08-2012, 09:45 PM | #16 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,760
|
The new Colorado is uglier than the BT50. There I said it and I stand by it!
Even the factory bullbar doesn't make it look any better. |
||
08-08-2012, 10:13 PM | #17 | ||
The Vengeful One
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
|
The new Colorado looks like a munted Captiva dual cab, ugly as sin!
__________________
|
||
08-08-2012, 10:19 PM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,412
|
Really, who gives flying **** about the Colorado.
Just another crap GM product. |
||
09-08-2012, 03:54 AM | #19 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-08-2012, 07:38 AM | #20 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mexico Vic
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-08-2012, 07:50 AM | #21 | ||
AFF Whore
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In between gas stations
Posts: 2,246
|
Seen a Colorado near work, not bad I thought.... Then saw a ranger (the large version with the bells and whistles) and Id take one of those over the Holden in a heartbeat.
|
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|