Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2005, 01:26 AM   #1
Deanodriver
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 138
Default Platform sharing - Ford Aus + Jaguar, possible?

I was thinking earlier on, about how Ford is bringing a new Falcon to market in a couple of years, and I've heard that Jaguar is releasing a new S type around the same time, is there any chance that these two cars could be related? With Ford's recent history of platform sharing among Ford-owned brands (think Focus/V40/Mazda3 and Mondeo/X-Type), there's always a chance.

I mean, they're both rear drive sedans that are about the same size, it could always be possible. If that's the case, I'm sure the Falcon would be able to benefit (from Jaguar's experience with making cars made of aluminium, for example).

Just food for thought.

Deanodriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-12-2005, 01:59 PM   #2
Fairlane
V8 Powaah
 
Fairlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Posts: 1,994
Default

I was under the impression that the Jaguar used a Lincoln platorm of some sort, as for a new falcon using a derivative platorm, i dont now but its always a possibility i suppose.
__________________
FG G6E Turbo- Seduce & Cashmere - Sold


XF S pack Sedan- AU 302 Windsor, T5, 2.77 LSD, Many Mods
Fairlane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-12-2005, 02:11 PM   #3
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

The S type and Lincoln LS both used the DEW98 platform, but its not viable for Ford as its extremely expensive, with lots of aluminium in the suspension etc. A modified version of the current platform will most likely be used for the 2008 Falcon.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2005, 12:34 AM   #4
Iphido
Guy that posts stuff
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 553
Default

I would imagine a blend of Falcon and territory suspension designs in the new car. I would also imagine some aluminium/alloy use in the suspension as well. Such as alloy upper wishbones, highstrength yet lighter blade bar etc.

IMHO Falcons should have steel body and chassis. Aluminium is all well and good, but its massively expensive to upgrade to and use, and to repair. And there are plenty of aluminium cars that still weigh 1800kg.

Personally if I was running jaguar I would be looking at the falcon platform long and hard to find a way to cut costs, increase margins and improve product. For all its extra expense and R&D, Jaguars products are no better dynamically than our falcon.
Iphido is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2005, 10:27 AM   #5
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

I agree, Jaguar haven't really made a dent in the luxury car market when compared to say BMW, Audi or Merc. The cars are as expensive as the aforementioned three however they do not contain the same level of sophistication or elegance as the BMW Merc or Audi. Personally I think they should look at adopting the cheaper Falcon Chassis and that way offer a 5-10% discount on their cars whilst still maintaining their margins and profitability.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2005, 10:43 AM   #6
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iphido
I would imagine a blend of Falcon and territory suspension designs in the new car. I would also imagine some aluminium/alloy use in the suspension as well. Such as alloy upper wishbones, highstrength yet lighter blade bar etc.

IMHO Falcons should have steel body and chassis. Aluminium is all well and good, but its massively expensive to upgrade to and use, and to repair. And there are plenty of aluminium cars that still weigh 1800kg.

Personally if I was running jaguar I would be looking at the falcon platform long and hard to find a way to cut costs, increase margins and improve product. For all its extra expense and R&D, Jaguars products are no better dynamically than our falcon.
With all the alloy used in the S type R it still weighs as much as a GT, so its no lightweight even with the extra expense of alloys used. The next S type will probably go to an alloy body just like the XJ.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2005, 07:44 PM   #7
DRU842
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 775
Default

A better bet would be platform sharing with the Mustang, which has closer 'economic' requirements.
__________________
2017 Mustang Lightening Blue, Cobb Intercooler, CAI, AccessPort, Turbo Blanket & V2 Exhaust, Mishimoto Down-Pipe & Overflow Tank, GFB DV+, Custom CRD Tune. Ford Performance Short Throw Shifter & Strut Brace. DBA T3 Brakes & Pads. Braided Brake Lines. H&R Coilovers. Anderson CF Track Pack Spoiler & Tailgate Panel. Blue CF/Leather Steering Wheel.
DRU842 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-12-2005, 08:50 PM   #8
Iphido
Guy that posts stuff
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 553
Default

I can hardly see Jaguar going back to a live axel. The mustang is based of a heavily revised DEW98 design (ie basically clean sheet, only related to DEW98 in name and broad concepts of suspension).

Ford have done a fantastic job with the falcon set up. Journo's continually refer to it as "as good as several more expensive european cars" etc. Some have flat out said its better than the E class, some have just said it has a bmw feel to it. My personal experience is its bloody good and could even become superior with proper execution (alloy wishbones = reducing unsprung mass, noise etc, quality monotube shocks which went missing in BF, etc). Im sure in Orion it will be close enough to not be a issue or a point of negitive diffrence. Falcon falls down on technology, quality (in design and in execution) and in badge.

In away they are already using the Falcon chassis, the X-type uses the Blade IRS system. Falcon has the ZF transmission as used in jags.

The line is bluring. Jaguar hasn't moved on and the Falcon certainly has. BMW and Merc have relentlessly moved on. Jaguar is still too trapped in its ways and styling wise is still in 1988.

Could Ford Australia build a BMW and Merc competitor. Yes, definately, off the Falcon platform. But it won't make ford Australia any significant money, and it would undercut jaguar.
Iphido is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL