Carbon Footprint Tax. !!!! Wtf

[|||]

just cancell the baby bonus. same effect & less ferrals having babies for the $$$

[Cobra]

Carbon footprint! I'll give that c*#t a carbon footprint size 13 straight up his @r5e!!!

[Perana]

Another hair-brained idea that will never happen...

Originally Posted by |||

just cancell the baby bonus. same effect & less ferrals having babies for the $$$

The plasma TV industry will surely suffer though!

[Elks]

Will taking shallow breathes be considered tax avoidance?

[sgt_doofey]

No more kids as no more heavy breathing = no more sex! Problem solved!

[irlewy86]

Originally Posted by myts

Will taking shallow breathes be considered tax avoidance?

hahahahahah. Imagine the tax returns

Q. How many breathes did you take this year
A. It was pretty slow maybe 1,000 top

[GORDZ]

and how are those taxes going to be put to good use???

as yet there is no way to make cold, without making more heat before hand. Global warming?, it's coming from my bloody engine bay idiots. me and the other hundred billion other cars out there. i think the greens have a bit of green fever from all the crap they're smoking. What a joke!

[vztrt]

Reading the article it doesn't say anything about the Greens more a bunch of academics, and if you've ever been to uni you'll know that the proffessors are pretty out there and have never been in the real world.

[Bobman]

Lol.

With all the talk in here in regards to "global warming = make money tactic". Isn't that what everyone else does? Has anyone actually thought of what harm would we do if we curbed emissions, etc? Try living in Hong Kong or Tokyo for a day.

Just driving in traffic gives you the 5hits with the pollution from old crap heaps.

While I agree this article is nonsense. It's not a bad idea to "curb" some of the over populators. Families should have 3 or 4 kids max.

[XR8putts]

Originally Posted by vztrt

Reading the article it doesn't say anything about the Greens more a bunch of academics, and if you've ever been to uni you'll know that the proffessors are pretty out there and have never been in the real world.

I'm doing Architecture at University, and the majority of lecturers agree that the ability to offset a Carbon footprint is full of . CFP was purely created to allow major industry to show they care about the environment and for individual idiots to feel good about themselves or to show others they are keen on nature. Naturally there is significant financial gain for many of the middlemen.

Green parties are the same accross the world - a bunch of hippie morons who don't have a clue.

[xbgs351]

Originally Posted by gtfpv

announced on the news this morning is a proposal from some political greeny type F' WIT. to introduce a tax for people who have more than 2 children . as people breath out carbon dioxide . ( which causes global worming) over a life time a person creates 80 tonnes o0f carbon dioxide which this F' WIT claims is not good for our planet. he is proposing $5000 tax at birth of third child . and then $800 /yr thereafter.
THATS TAXING THE AIR WE BREATH. . i would really like to have some fun with this bloke .

I would love to see you have a debate with Dr. Walters, preferably live on TV, because you would be the one that would come across as a complete idiot.

[[Tonko]]

OT but......
During the Election, i noticed the Greens were the only party to nail posters/boards to trees, how does that work?

[Bobman]

Originally Posted by [Tonko]

OT but......
During the Election, i noticed the Greens were the only party to nail posters/boards to trees, how does that work?

They did it last election too, I think the state one in Victoria.

There's still a sign nailed to a tree near my place.

[GORDZ]

don't worry, it'll decompose

[XR8putts]

Originally Posted by GORDZ

don't worry, it'll decompose

I just hope it dosn't produce any CO2 in the process.

[Work Horse]

Originally Posted by Abacus

Professor Bob Carter from James Cook University sets out the inconvenient facts that rebut Al Gore's inconvenient myth:

Carter 1

Carter 2

Carter 3

Carter 4

The CSIRO on Professor Carter's misinformation
http://www.csiro.au/news/ps38w.html

[fmc351]

Originally Posted by Work Horse

The CSIRO on Professor Carter's misinformation
http://www.csiro.au/news/ps38w.html

Funny how those who say global warming is a load of garbage accuse people trying to warn us of ignorance and scare tactics. Better than half truths and blatant lies for the sheeple to just keep going as if nothing is wrong.

I love it when pots start yelling at kettles only to find out its a mirror.

"Da da, to ze showers, we get you clean"

[gtfpv]

Originally Posted by xbgs351

I would love to see you have a debate with Dr. Walters, preferably live on TV, because you would be the one that would come across as a complete idiot.

HUhh !!!! thanks mate . where did that one come from. ??

[gtfpv]

Originally Posted by gtfpv

i dont think doctor walters would like it if they brought in a poo jabbing tax, somehow.

sorry 'xbgs351' ; didn't mean to offend you buddy !!!

[Geez Louise]

Does this mean that if I give one of my kids back to the Government I get a rebate?? They can take hubby too!! :

[cob115]

my good what a load of crap! f@#$% crap !.i here Al joe jam gore is speeking to the other feral left at barli about climate change ,unfotunatly the ferrals are gaining a following and will love to make us car enjoying red necks pay more through tax

[MRJUCY]

The hippies have been doing the same thing for years. Come out with something completely ridiculous to shock people & then when they come up with another idea people would have previously thought was ridiculous it will seem reasonable in comparison so it gets in. It's the same as it has got to the point now where otherwise half intelligent & sane people believe in the theory that man controls the weather after years of being force fed gradually increasing lies.

[GORDZ]

but women talk waaaaay more than men do, so does that mean you'd be worth more of a rebate? c'mon louise, take one for the team!!! lol

[theunfairadvant]

Originally Posted by fmc351

Gives new meaning the statement by Peter Costello a couple years back with the baby bonus stuff when the government was saying we needed to have more kids, "have one kid for mum, one kid for dad and one kid for the treasurer".

Something else we in Qld wont have to pay...

The govt wanted to have more tax payer so that it can fund for
the future old age people who need more when they are old.

Our current system will not last very long so thats why they need
more tax payers to fund it.

Hence breed more children and don't use protection,
as the govt will protect you.

[Fev]

if he seems so upset and concerned about it why doesnt he go stop breathing.. or someone do it for him..

what kind o f****er would come up with that!

[theunfairadvant]

Originally Posted by Fev

if he seems so upset and concerned about it why doesnt he go stop breathing.. or someone do it for him..

what kind of ****er would come up with that!

I couldn't believe it when i saw this post as well,
can someone just pull the plug on this boof head.

He need to pull his brain out of his ars e.

[fmc351]

Originally Posted by theunfairadvant

The govt wanted to have more tax payer so that it can fund for
the future old age people who need more when they are old.

Our current system will not last very long so thats why they need
more tax payers to fund it.

Hence breed more children and don't use protection,
as the govt will protect you.

Yeah, it was a joke mate. Costello is not making this call, and it has nothing to do with him.

The thread mentions taxing more than 2 kids, thus have one for the treasurer.