Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

View Poll Results: Have you driven in NT?
Yes, but only at 130 due to new limit 6 3.95%
Yes, I lived there (or close to it) and drove above 110 when I could 9 5.92%
Yes, I went there to visit and drove above 110 when I could 28 18.42%
Yes I went there but only did 100-110 as faster than that is dangerous 0 0%
No, I have never been to NT but wish I had before the 130 96 63.16%
No, I would never go to NT, it is too dangerous with all the speeding maniacs on the road 1 0.66%
No, I never go more than 20km from a Macca's carparks 12 7.89%
Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-10-2010, 07:55 PM   #31
GasoLane
Former BTIKD
Donating Member2
 
GasoLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by casabonka
Unrestricted in NSW is still 130 though isnt it?
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
GasoLane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:13 PM   #32
NAK302
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
NAK302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coowonga
Posts: 1,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dylancox
What/who is Humpty Doo? Is that what you guys call the local police up in the NT?
a pub with the biggest set of buffalo horns behind the bar you'll ever likely see
NAK302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:15 PM   #33
Burnout
Falcon RTV - FG G6ET
Donating Member3
 
Burnout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In Da Bush, QLD
Posts: 31,839
Default

Lived in the NT in the early 70's, didn't try the limit out in those days as a B-61 all trailered up took 5 miles to get to 45mph &.... sometimes a similar distance to stop.
I did get a chance to drive an early 4 speed Tojo down the Barkley Beef Road and as I was gathering some pace the near side rear wheel came passed us and took off across the table drain.

Was back up there in the early 80's for a few years and found 140kph to 150kph to my liking......... Had a purpose built Ute though!

Saw (and heard) of some spectacular stacks, not just the usual caravans being blown off the tar by the triples either.
One bloke I knew rolled his cruiser down the side on the Stuart near the "Beetaloo" boundary, he got tossed out on the last roll he said and the vehicle came to rest across his right leg. Luckily the ground was soft due to the 'wet',, he had to drink his own urine for three days till some bloke who stopped for a 'leak' spotted his overturned vehicle across the flat.

That was the same week our young Pilot stacked the Cessna 179 Skylane into the Blacksoil swamp beside the Borraloola airstrip. He lived as well.
__________________
BAII RTV - with Raptor V S/C.

RTV Power
FG G6ET 50th Anniversary in Sensation.
While the basic Ford Six was code named Barra, the Turbo version clearly deserved its very own moniker – again enter Gordon Barfield.
We asked him if the engine had actually been called “Seagull” and how that came about.
“Actually it was just call “Gull”, because I named it that. Because we knew it was going to poo on everything”.

Last edited by Burnout; 25-10-2010 at 08:27 PM.
Burnout is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:24 PM   #34
GS608
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ...in the shed
Posts: 3,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by casabonka
I was at Murwilumbah (sp?) back in July and about 10kms north there are a few un-restricted roads towards Urliup. Had some great fun at about 150-160 for a few metres before slowing to 120... Unrestricted in NSW is still 130 though isnt it?
Lucky there weren't any cops around..unrestricted doesn't exsist in Aus anymore..the sign refers to default rural limit, which is 110 in NSW i think?
GS608 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:25 PM   #35
Bushbasher
When in doubt, GAS IT!!
 
Bushbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lower Eyre Peninsula, SA
Posts: 3,018
Default

Yup, lived in the Alice for 2 years and used to cruise at 130-140 but when I saw a police car up ahead I'd always floor it and took much joy in legally passing them going over 170kph. My poor old 2L auto Cortina wouldn't go any faster than that, :( ............ and yes, travelling at those speeds certainly makes you pay more attention.


Bushbasher
__________________
.





HERS- BFIII Wagon Gold, alloys, dual fuel, bullbar, big tow pack, trans cooler, fully rebuilt HD suspension, Clarion, alarmed, full 2 1/2" sports system, mint body

MINE- AUII Forte
Meteorite, dual fuel but otherwise bog stock.

MINE- AUII Fairlane Sportsman Liquid Silver over meteorite,HIDs', Airhog, Eagle Leads, dual fuel, custom rear springs, BA slotted discs + a second one for spares

.
Bushbasher is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 08:52 PM   #36
SteveJH
No longer a Uni student..
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR-CHIEF
Lucky there weren't any cops around..unrestricted doesn't exsist in Aus anymore..the sign refers to default rural limit, which is 110 in NSW i think?
Yes, and i'm fairly sure unrestricted is
Urban: 50km/h
Rural: 100km/h
SteveJH is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 09:44 PM   #37
casabonka
You can call me Chris
 
casabonka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 712
Default

hmm.. note to self - dont drive fast when you see an unrestricted sign...
Oops
__________________
'06 LS Focus Hatch
-2 1/4" Lukey Exhaust
-RDA Slotted discs/Greenstuff pads
-Rear Whiteline swaybay
-Lenso 18's w/Kumho rubber
-Tinted Windows
casabonka is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:12 PM   #38
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushbasher
and yes, travelling at those speeds certainly makes you pay more attention.


Bushbasher
Yeah but the people who set speed limits have probably never drove a vehicle over 60km/h before.
All they drive is from their inner city house to the their office. Any long distances they have to cover they will fly.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:22 PM   #39
Tealglow
Waiting
 
Tealglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alice Springs, NT
Posts: 105
Default

My daily commute to work was 15 or so kms unlimited at usually 200+.

Hence the need for a WRX at the time (the legendary 99 model).

On the rare occasion I took the XY out it would sit on about 110 mph+, on the straights of course.

Now I can only do 130 . It takes me 5 min longer to get there.
__________________
1971 XY Fairmont GS Factory 351C & Toploader- Electric Blue & Convo Pros

1984 Bronco XLT 351 C6 4WD - Black/ Silver LPG, 3" Lift, American Racing Wheels

2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited CRD Renegade- Black

2009 FG XR6 Vixen
Tealglow is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 10:27 PM   #40
dylancox
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by casabonka
hmm.. note to self - dont drive fast when you see an unrestricted sign...
Oops
Out where I live, there used to be an 80 speed limit sign on a dead straight back road. Then, all of a sudden it vanished, the pole is there but looks like someone's got an axe and chopped it. 4 years have passed and the sign has not returned
dylancox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2010, 11:03 PM   #41
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dylancox
Out where I live, there used to be an 80 speed limit sign on a dead straight back road. Then, all of a sudden it vanished, the pole is there but looks like someone's got an axe and chopped it. 4 years have passed and the sign has not returned
O.M.G. Where are they putting all the dead bodies.....
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 12:07 AM   #42
cheap
Wirlankarra yanama
 
cheap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: God's Country
Posts: 2,103
Default

We lived in Darwin from 2003 to 2004, during a period where the NT highways had an open speed limit (i.e. no speed limit).

I have legally driven thousands of kms at very high speed, my Road King at +160km/hr regularly from Humpty Doo to Adelaide River or Jabiru. My mates Hyabussa at +260km/hr or my Land Cruiser at +160km/hr traveling to Alice Springs or Camooweal. I think I have some experience at high speed driving.

The NT had a unique situation which allowed for open speed limit:
(a) a requirement to travel long distances in a reasonable time and the NT has limited alternative travel options available
(b) a very good highway, wide, well maintained, graded and extensively cleared of obstruction on both side of the highway, flat terrain with long straights where viability is not an issue
(c) sparse population
(d) extremely low traffic volumes on the NT Highways
(e) generally good and predictable weather conditions, no fog, no snow and little rain for most of the year
(f) a parochial government, fiercely independent and willing to tell Canberra to "get stuffed"

Except for (f) all of the above items exist today.

Beginning in 2007 the NT government removed the open speed limit and placed a 130km/hr limit on the highways. This was done to normalise road speeds across Australia (in reality there was huge political and financial pressure from Canberra's politicians and bureaucrats to remove the open speed limit).

As far as I know NT was the final place on Earth with an open speed limit (despite what the NT opposition says there will never again be legal open speed driving in NT.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Driving at high speed was a buzz , but then it became ordinary. High speed driving did bring some unintended consequences :

(1) Concentration V's Being Alert. You're traveling at high speed 160km/hr concentrating on the road ahead and someone overtakes you at +200km/hr. This scares the crap out of people.

(2) Distance perception. Traveling at 160km/hr and the oncoming car is also traveling at 160km/hr. You're closing in one each other at 320km/hr! All of a sudden what you thought was a overtaking gap isn't.

(3) Vehicle performance. It requires more energy for cars to accelerate/overtake whilst doing 130km/hr and accelerating to 150km/hr than it does from 110km/hr to 130km/hr. It takes longer to overtake and you're on the opposite side of the road longer.

(4) Increased Speed means greater braking distances and vehicle instability increases too.

(5) Increased fatigue. Many research studies suggests that increased speed required increases to your concentration which in turn increases fatigue.

(6) The unexpected happens faster. The buffalo crossing the highway has right of way, your reaction times are significantly less.

(7) Driver behavior and attitude. From my experience, even with an open speed limit, most people in the NT drove at 130-140km/hr. I found that driving in Europe and the USA too, that fast drivers drive at 130-140km/hr or 85mph. Perhaps these speeds are what the human brain can comfortably cope with?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Would 130km/hr work outside NT?

Answer: NO and for a number of reasons.

In my opinion it would not be possible because almost every road I've traveled on (and I've travel extensively) would fail on points a,b,c, d and e. In plain terms nearly every Australian road would need substantial improvement.

Our better motorways and highways have too much traffic on them, Sydney-Newcastle freeway or M1 Brisbane-Gold Coast would have in relative terms 10,000 times the traffic volume per hour than that of NT.

I would have to say that driver behavior was better in NT than it is here in Queensland and much much better than when we lived in Sydney. There would need to be improvements in driver behavior, perhaps training people to cope with higher speed driving is necessary.

Australia's aging population would be be a problem for increased speed limits.

The need for government to be seen to be protecting us from ourselves would not assist the high speed movement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know I've rambled on a fair bit, thanks for your time.
cheap is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 07:15 AM   #43
Road Games
Guest
 
Road Games's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gods Country
Posts: 16,258
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Replacement. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR-CHIEF
Lucky there weren't any cops around..unrestricted doesn't exsist in Aus anymore..the sign refers to default rural limit, which is 110 in NSW i think?
I saw them at Speed on Tweed for the first time near the sugar mill ? And thought woohooo and of course i was doing a bit more than the default limit But in my defense your honour i was trying to escape the greenies ...
Road Games is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 07:34 AM   #44
NAK302
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
NAK302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coowonga
Posts: 1,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap
We lived in Darwin from 2003 to 2004, during a period where the NT highways had an open speed limit (i.e. no speed limit).

I have legally driven thousands of kms at very high speed, my Road King at +160km/hr regularly from Humpty Doo to Adelaide River or Jabiru. My mates Hyabussa at +260km/hr or my Land Cruiser at +160km/hr traveling to Alice Springs or Camooweal. I think I have some experience at high speed driving.

The NT had a unique situation which allowed for open speed limit:
(a) a requirement to travel long distances in a reasonable time and the NT has limited alternative travel options available
(b) a very good highway, wide, well maintained, graded and extensively cleared of obstruction on both side of the highway, flat terrain with long straights where viability is not an issue
(c) sparse population
(d) extremely low traffic volumes on the NT Highways
(e) generally good and predictable weather conditions, no fog, no snow and little rain for most of the year
(f) a parochial government, fiercely independent and willing to tell Canberra to "get stuffed"

Except for (f) all of the above items exist today.

Beginning in 2007 the NT government removed the open speed limit and placed a 130km/hr limit on the highways. This was done to normalise road speeds across Australia (in reality there was huge political and financial pressure from Canberra's politicians and bureaucrats to remove the open speed limit).

As far as I know NT was the final place on Earth with an open speed limit (despite what the NT opposition says there will never again be legal open speed driving in NT.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Driving at high speed was a buzz , but then it became ordinary. High speed driving did bring some unintended consequences :

(1) Concentration V's Being Alert. You're traveling at high speed 160km/hr concentrating on the road ahead and someone overtakes you at +200km/hr. This scares the crap out of people.

(2) Distance perception. Traveling at 160km/hr and the oncoming car is also traveling at 160km/hr. You're closing in one each other at 320km/hr! All of a sudden what you thought was a overtaking gap isn't.

(3) Vehicle performance. It requires more energy for cars to accelerate/overtake whilst doing 130km/hr and accelerating to 150km/hr than it does from 110km/hr to 130km/hr. It takes longer to overtake and you're on the opposite side of the road longer.

(4) Increased Speed means greater braking distances and vehicle instability increases too.

(5) Increased fatigue. Many research studies suggests that increased speed required increases to your concentration which in turn increases fatigue.

(6) The unexpected happens faster. The buffalo crossing the highway has right of way, your reaction times are significantly less.

(7) Driver behavior and attitude. From my experience, even with an open speed limit, most people in the NT drove at 130-140km/hr. I found that driving in Europe and the USA too, that fast drivers drive at 130-140km/hr or 85mph. Perhaps these speeds are what the human brain can comfortably cope with?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Would 130km/hr work outside NT?

Answer: NO and for a number of reasons.

In my opinion it would not be possible because almost every road I've traveled on (and I've travel extensively) would fail on points a,b,c, d and e. In plain terms nearly every Australian road would need substantial improvement.

Our better motorways and highways have too much traffic on them, Sydney-Newcastle freeway or M1 Brisbane-Gold Coast would have in relative terms 10,000 times the traffic volume per hour than that of NT.

I would have to say that driver behavior was better in NT than it is here in Queensland and much much better than when we lived in Sydney. There would need to be improvements in driver behavior, perhaps training people to cope with higher speed driving is necessary.

Australia's aging population would be be a problem for increased speed limits.

The need for government to be seen to be protecting us from ourselves would not assist the high speed movement.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know I've rambled on a fair bit, thanks for your time.

no rambling there mate, i reckon you nailed it.
when i lived there, the CLP were in charge. the chief minister around that time was Marshal Perron who was quite a car enthusiest, which helped.

i guess Clare Martin (ALP) can be thanked for the decision
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2006/s1780096.htm
NAK302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 07:58 AM   #45
Bearman
Moderator Ford Coupe Club
 
Bearman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vic
Posts: 3,905
Default

Great post by cheap (Post #42). Great insight by someone who has lived there. Rep points to you mate!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap
(7) Driver behavior and attitude. From my experience, even with an open speed limit, most people in the NT drove at 130-140km/hr. I found that driving in Europe and the USA too, that fast drivers drive at 130-140km/hr or 85mph. Perhaps these speeds are what the human brain can comfortably cope with?
This point in particular is spot on. In my younger days whenever I found myself on suitable roads this is what I found myself travelling at. I reckon 130-140km/h is a very comfortable cruising speed in suitable conditions. These are obviously the days before Constable Kodak was recruited to steal $$ from motorists.

Now in particular the cars are so much more suitable than they were 20-30 years ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap
The need for government to be seen to be protecting us from ourselves would not assist the high speed movement.
Read: Nanny state-ism. Once entrenched it's virtually impossible to move. Sounds like Clare Martin has wrecked the place.
__________________
Mitsubishi ASX Auto, White - Daily Commuter
XC Fairmont Coupe, 351 4spd, Graphite Grey - The Antidote

http://www.fordcoupeclub.org

"If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there" George Harrison 2001.
Bearman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 09:10 AM   #46
Brent
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 667
Default

+1 for the argument around 130-140kph being a comfortable 'faster' speed that most people tend to settle into on the right roads. I found this to be true overseas as well. It keeps you interested, you cover the miles well, but it allows just that bit up the sleeve for an emergency stop or evasive move that sometimes occurs. All the 200+kph talk is good for bragging rights down at the pub but its not really all that relevant even on excellent divided roads. A quick blat to 200 is one thing, but to settle on that speed and do it for an hour or more on end SAFELY is another.

For me, its the much better 'flow' of traffic in a de-restricted zone that appeals, not the opportunity for outright speed. People settle into their chosen speed grove, the faster cars can overtake, and it breaks down the infruriating freight train nose to tail conga line of traffic that we always see on our highways today.
Brent is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 10:22 AM   #47
BrisVegas
Noobie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 525
Default

+2 for 130-140 being an appropriate speed for our open roads. I lived in the states for a few years and found that without speed cameras (at the time), most people settled at around 80mph with the odd person going a little faster to overtake. It's actually a joy to travel long distances on good roads at an appropriate speed. I've driven from Key West to Canada and visited 40 states in my time in America and I miss the easy driving over there. Australia is a massive, sparesely populated country and needs a more realistic speed limit. 130kmh would be better, with some latitude given to drivers who are overtaking trucks and so forth. Cameras cause drivers to focus solely on the speedo needle. The increasingly shocking driving behaviour we see in Oz now is a direct consequence.
__________________
BrisVegas
WS Fiesta Zetec 3dr
NM Pajero TD LWB
LS Focus Zetec 5dr - gone
WS Fiesta Zetec 5dr - gone
BrisVegas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 10:38 AM   #48
superroo
You can't stop the signal
 
superroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Behind a computer at work
Posts: 1,624
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Has done quite a few excellent write ups for au .com 
Default

Good to see there are some "like" minded people.

I've never driven in the NT, but there is a certain town in NSW 3ish hours from Melbourne which I've driven to a fair few times. Once you get into NSW the road is pretty much dead flat, dead straight (occasional turn), with a clear 50m both sides of the road, and pretty quiet.

I generally bump up the speeds due to point’s b, c, d, e from above. I generally sit around 150 and am a lot more attent than what I was in the previous 2 hours sitting at 100 in the nanny state. This is without stopping either.

As guys have said that feels comfortable. Quick but not too quick in a road car and on a public road. When another car comes the other way, drop the speed down a bit so it's safer.

But that said I'd only do that in the AU. A 100kph is sketchy enough in my daily (90's laser). I also reckon it takes a certain mind frame to do it as well. There are plenty of guys I know that I wouldn't trust doing the posted limit of 100.

The biggest point is drive to the conditions. This is why many people in the NT only drove at 130 even though they could go faster.
However this is something which many people driving do not realise. Just because the speed limit is X, doesn't mean you have to do X

Cheers
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Brown
I own a Dodge Viper and a minivan, and if I could only keep one of them, it would be the minivan
superroo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 10:44 AM   #49
Spinner77
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 292
Default

Here's something interesting. A mainstream, non-motoring journalist endorses Mercedes' safety expert on the the desirability of higher speeds on freeways:

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a..._well_nod_off/

Andrew Bolt's blog has a large following.
Spinner77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 11:28 AM   #50
cheap
Wirlankarra yanama
 
cheap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: God's Country
Posts: 2,103
Default

One other item I forgot to mention and that is fuel consumption.

With my Land Cruiser sitting on a steady 100km/hr I can repeatedly get 925-950 km range.

But traveling at 160km/hr the truck simply guzzles, little more than 500km range. High speed means more friction means more fuel.

Some simple maths.

900 km @ 100km/hr means no stops = 9 hours
900 km @ 160km/hr means 1 stop (say 10 minutes/stop) = about 6 hours + an extra 145ltrs of fuel

Over very long distances is where higher speed makes an difference but it comes at a cost.

Cheers
cheap is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 11:51 AM   #51
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap
One other item I forgot to mention and that is fuel consumption.

With my Land Cruiser sitting on a steady 100km/hr I can repeatedly get 925-950 km range.

But traveling at 160km/hr the truck simply guzzles, little more than 500km range. High speed means more friction means more fuel.

Some simple maths.

900 km @ 100km/hr means no stops = 9 hours
900 km @ 160km/hr means 1 stop (say 10 minutes/stop) = about 6 hours + an extra 145ltrs of fuel

Over very long distances is where higher speed makes an difference but it comes at a cost.

Cheers
Not everyone drives a landcruiser.

My datto can go from Hervey Bay to Airlie (900km +/-) at an average speed of 108km/h (2 weeks ago in fact) in just under 9 hrs with no stops at all.
If I had been able to legally average 130km/h it would have been 8 hours with a break and maybe 10 litres extra fuel.

It comes down to horses for courses, your LC is a far more appropriate vehicle for the bush than my datto whereas the datto is a high speed road vehicle.

Going fast in a 4WD just because you legally can is about as silly as driving a datto across the Simpson desert.......
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 12:04 PM   #52
GreenMachine
Mopar/No Car
 
GreenMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down the Obi..
Posts: 4,648
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Sensational write up about drum brakes. 
Default

That's one thing I found in the brief time I had a Ford Laser as a work car in Darwin - At 160kph, the little 4cyl is revving like a whipper snipper and using about 20L/100, which meant I was flat out getting between servos on the Stuart Highway... This was replaced with a VE Commodore that's barely off idle at 160 and probably more fuel efficient than at 110...
__________________
ColumnShift Media

'72 Plymouth Scamp
'80 Courier
'13 Kawasaki ZX14-R
'13 Berlina
'92 Suzuki DR650

If you don't fight - You lose
GreenMachine is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 01:10 PM   #53
Addz08
"FEED IT"
 
Addz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Morayfield...
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dylancox
What/who is Humpty Doo? Is that what you guys call the local police up in the NT?

Nah mate its just a little town, not much there...
__________________
BA XR8 UTE ,PACEMAKER 4/1'S,MAGNAFLOW METALCORE CATS,TOYS CUSTOM TWIN 2 1/2 SYSTEM, CAPA TUNE, K&N FILTER, LIGHTENED BILLET STEEL FLYWHEEL, DCS CLUTCH, SS INDUCTIONS BIGMOUTH CAI, 20" FR20 SIMMONS....
Addz08 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 01:17 PM   #54
Brent
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 667
Default

I'd question the merits of doing 160kph in a 4WD in anything other than the most modern road-going versions (e.g. Porsche Cayenne or BMW X5). You'd be right on the envelope of the vehicle's design parametres at that speed. If something were to go wrong......
Brent is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 02:14 PM   #55
dylancox
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Addz08
Nah mate its just a little town, not much there...
Gee, Humpty Doo.. what a name? Surely the person who named the place musn't have been serious or was a fan of Humpy Dumpty
dylancox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2010, 02:35 PM   #56
Riksta
Captain Malcolm Reynolds
 
Riksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dylancox
What/who is Humpty Doo? Is that what you guys call the local police up in the NT?
Didn't all the king's horses, and all the king's men, have trouble putting him back together again?

Although how a horse, king's or otherwise, could put ANYTHING back together again is beyond me.
__________________
Currently: 2014 Mazda6 GT (Daily) and 1999 Mazda MX5 (Fun Car)
Previously: 2001 Ford Escape XLT; 2010 MC Mondeo; 1984 FD LTD; 2001 AU2 Falcon Forte; 2005 LS Focus Zetec; 1988 RE Colt; 1982 RB Colt; 1974 KE20 Corolla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
Riksta likes VN's so much, he has the ashes of a VN in a jar on the mantle piece, a vile of VN engine oil hanging from his neck and a BT1 build plate locked up in a safe, buried under 6ft of concrete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Day-mow
pretty much what has happened here is i trolled you. and it was fun.
Riksta is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-10-2010, 10:09 AM   #57
Spinner77
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 292
Default

A footnote to my post #49 above.

Among the comments on the blog post is this:


"...rumour going around within DoJ that, following the next election in Nov, the Government is considering reducing the current speed camera tolerance from 3km/h to 2km/h as it is estimated this will generate around an extra $40million a year in revenue."

To which someone has replied:

"I can guarantee that won’t happen. The manufacturers of the cameras say that the cameras have a certain tolerance for accuracy. Cutting the ‘official’ tolerance to 2km/h leaves them open to court challenges on that basis."

FWIW, here is my take. Technology improves all the time. All that needs to be done is to prove to the courts that a tolerance of, say, 2km/h is reliable. If that means replacing all the cameras, software and computers, it could still be a great money spinner.

Even if the upgrade cost $40m., it would pay for itself in a year. Not as good as buying a pokie machine that pays for itself in hours, but not bad. Not bad at all.
Spinner77 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-10-2010, 11:08 AM   #58
grandpa_spec_F6
AFF Whore
 
grandpa_spec_F6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In between gas stations
Posts: 2,246
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Although not high speed related, I was going through a school zone today at the requisite 2k's under the speed limit becuaseifyougoanyfasteryoullkillsomeone, and found that I was watching my speedo like a hawk the majority of the time due the the fact they can find you for going 1k over, and it only takes the slightest bump of the accelerator at those speeds.

Surely this would also apply to open roads as well? I have cruise control so I tend to set and forget, however on the downhill sections this seems to creep just past the limit and I'm forced to brake. I really do agree that we should focus on infrastructure and some 'lateral' thinking, rather than focusing on the the draconian mindset of "if I keep making the penalties harsher it will make a difference".
__________________
Favorite Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo View Post
My GMC Sierra is banned under Victoria's high powered vehicle laws, and its a 4082kg apartment complex on wheels.
Current Ride: Not a falcon, the struggle is real
grandpa_spec_F6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-10-2010, 11:15 AM   #59
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

The way speed is policed in this country is ******.
It's all about money making. We need to stand up for ourselves, it's going too far. Every week they seam to be thinking up new ideas to fine more people... NOT to stop crashes.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-10-2010, 11:20 AM   #60
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist

Going fast in a 4WD just because you legally can is about as silly as driving a datto across the Simpson desert.......
If I had a Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 I would be going as fast as I can. That's a 4x4 can do 270KM/h
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL