Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-12-2013, 09:23 AM   #31
johnydep
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
johnydep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 4,611
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by hedgehobb View Post
But the fact remains, you chose not to go to court.

I'm not saying the system doesn't suck, but it's the best we got. Unless you want something like Judge Dredd on your ***.

edit: or worse, American cops, shoot your *** because you disrespected them

edit 2: oh, and for all those suffering from supiditis and complaining "Woe is me, I can't fathom these dog-garnit fandanged speed road limits consarnit!"

Get a sat nav! Get someone to program it to beep if you go over the limit ffs
The report then examines the public’s resistance to South Australia’s highest-in-the-nation fines regime.

“..there is one sticking point and this is evident in community reaction to the lack of harmonisation across States of the level of fines for the same offence; that the level of fines often do not reflect the potential seriousness of an offence; that inconsistent speed limits create unnecessary confusion and the level of tolerance (or allowance) for above a specific speed limit is ill-defined and/or unstated.

“Motorists with a clean driving record are not rewarded. These and other reasons have cemented in the minds of the general public that particularly mobile speed and fixed cameras are employed as revenue raising devices for the government.”


The high fines, it says, leads to a further complication of licence suspension.

“Resistance to the payment of traffic fines and/or the inability to meet payment is reported to have resulted in 23,000 people having their licence suspended in 2012/1314; fine-related revocations of a licence do not necessarily result in people not driving, but continuing to drive without compulsory third party insurance (which carries its own risk).

“The fine for driving an unregistered vehicle in South Australia at or about the time registration stickers were no longer issued increased from $335 to $1,000 and the fine for driving uninsured increased from $600 to $1,500.

“It is questionable whether government conducted a sufficient information campaign (similar to drink driving) to inform the community of the subtle change in responsibility to ensure a vehicle is registered and the penalties for not doing so.”

In its analysis of the data, the report questions the high fines regime.

“Road traffic fines in South Australia appear higher than those in other States. To what extent do they reflect ‘dangerous’ driving? Are South Australian drivers dangerous?
__________________
The true danger only occurs when you take a potentially dangerous piece of machinery
and place it in the hands of the most unpredictable species on the planet.
Human behaviour, as history has catalogued, cannot account for what any persons actions may be,
especially concerning their love of the motor vehicle.

http://www.fireservicecollege.ac.uk
johnydep is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 09:48 AM   #32
aussie muscle
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
aussie muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squish View Post
The sad part is that challenging it is such a hassle that I'll probably just pay it.
that's what they want you to do. overloading the courts is the only way to stem the flow.

Quote:
the level of tolerance (or allowance) for above a specific speed limit is ill-defined and/or unstated.
it's pretty bad govt policy that these definitions are purposely hidden. i suppose it's to make it harder to defend against
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO.
aussie muscle is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 09:57 AM   #33
monzie
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: N/E.Vic
Posts: 243
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by zilo View Post
Good to see fog light laws being enforced.

Serves you right.
X2, misuse of fog lights is a pox on motoring.

Pete
monzie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 11:07 AM   #34
MercurySilver
Isn't it obvious?
Donating Member1
 
MercurySilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: in a world of idiots
Posts: 5,383
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

LOL

i mean having your fog lights on might cause the death of a bus load of school kids
and you wouldnt want to have to live with that for the rest of your life

FINE: 4wd headlights beaming me in the face on lowbeam as im driving towards them because they have aftermarket brighter globes

NOT FINE: driving with your fog lights on that actually dont beam you in the face when you head towards oncoming traffic because heavens to betsy that bus load of school kids might be just around the corner

__________________
08 Strike G6E T.
10 Ergo G6E
Sept 75 XB Falcon in mushroom beige, 3 on the tree 200cid for sale, offers in the teens
MercurySilver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 11:10 AM   #35
MercurySilver
Isn't it obvious?
Donating Member1
 
MercurySilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: in a world of idiots
Posts: 5,383
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlivverFord View Post
I also dislike "END 80" signs on rural roads. Speed camera got me a beaut' in my first month back here. As the state limit is 110kph I simply assumed that's what I could do after driving past one of those signs. $130 fine told me it's not!
there is one of these signs literally two streets away from me, just before a country intersection!
it then goes to 100kms past the intersection just around the bend
i always thought it meant that speed zone is now over and it was the state limit!
thats what i was told

so, what the hell is the speed limit after the END 80km sign then ???

wiki:
The "END" speed limit sign is increasingly used throughout Australia to signal the end of a posted speed restriction, or built-up area 'default' speed-limit leading to the jurisdiction's 'rural' default speed limit. It contains the word "END" and a number in a black circle beneath this, representing the ceasing speed-limit. It is typically used where, according to AS1742.4 the road beyond has certain hazards such as hidden driveways, poor camber, soft edges and other hazards where the road authority feels a posted speed limit sign might be too dangerous or otherwise unwarranted. It is intended therefore to invoke particular caution


errr
huh?
__________________
08 Strike G6E T.
10 Ergo G6E
Sept 75 XB Falcon in mushroom beige, 3 on the tree 200cid for sale, offers in the teens
MercurySilver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 11:56 AM   #36
BENT_8
BLUE OVAL INC.
 
BENT_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,768
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by falconboy View Post
Being from NSW I was amazed on a recent holiday to SA how many damn cameras there where at intersections etc, particularly in Adelaide. They seemed to be absolutely everywhere. I didn't even realise until half way through my first day driving around as I found the signs to not always be obvious or even exist at the sites of all cameras. I can tell you what though, the time I was there it slowed me down, and obviously does everyone else too. I was flabbergasted how in a bunch of traffic everyone was pretty much driving along with each other at the speed limit, all very peacefully, it actually felt very surreal. I don't entirely agree with what often seems to be revenue raising, but maybe we need it in NSW to slow people down.
A family friend moved to Adelaide from Melbourne 10 years ago, whilst sitting having a coffee soon after he arrived he commented on how no one was in hurry. He said that in Melbourne everyone is in a hurry to get somewhere.
Having lived in Sydney and spent a bit of time in SE Qld, I think he was bang on the money.
The fact that you were flabbergasted by our ability to successfully negotiate traffic whilst maintaining a legal speed says something about the driving attitudes of our eastern neighbours.
BENT_8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 12:35 PM   #37
Bushbasher
When in doubt, GAS IT!!
 
Bushbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lower Eyre Peninsula, SA
Posts: 3,018
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by MercurySilver View Post
FINE: 4wd headlights beaming me in the face on lowbeam as im driving towards them because they have aftermarket brighter globes
This is one of my pet hates as well but I don't think it's got anything to do with the globes used, it's got more to do with the lights being poorly adjusted. They are adjusted from the factory with no weight in the back and most 4x4 owners don't have the common sense to re-adjust them when they fill them with fuel, load up the back with kids and assorted crap and/or then hitch up a trailer or caravan. consequently they are way too high and we all suffer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MercurySilver View Post
NOT FINE: driving with your fog lights on that actually don't beam you in the face when you head towards oncoming traffic......
I have to disagree here, those factory fog lights and a lot of the cheaper after market ones don't have any kind of shaped beam as they are more of a flood than a tight beam, so they do dazzle oncoming traffic, that is why it's illegal to run them unless the conditions require them. I have a set of fogs and a set of driving lights in the Smartbar of the wagon, both Narva, and the fogs have a very defined cut off line that keeps the light below eye line. The other lights just flood. The fogs are designed to keep the light low so you can see the road and fog line and centre lines and not dazzle you with reflected light off of the white fog as that effectively blinds you. When the fog gets thick enough I have been known to turn off my headlights and run on the fog lights alone as that gives the best penetration and most contrast to be able to still see the road. All the headlights end up doing is causing a white out as the light reflects back off of the fog and blinds me.

If you want to use your "fog" lights as extra peripheral lighting then adjust them to flood the sides of the road and hook them to the high beam circuit, otherwise leave them off unless you actually have foggy or adverse conditions.
__________________
.





HERS- BFIII Wagon Gold, alloys, dual fuel, bullbar, big tow pack, trans cooler, fully rebuilt HD suspension, Clarion, alarmed, full 2 1/2" sports system, mint body

MINE- AUII Forte
Meteorite, dual fuel but otherwise bog stock.

MINE- AUII Fairlane Sportsman Liquid Silver over meteorite,HIDs', Airhog, Eagle Leads, dual fuel, custom rear springs, BA slotted discs + a second one for spares

.

Last edited by Bushbasher; 20-12-2013 at 12:41 PM.
Bushbasher is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 20-12-2013, 07:56 PM   #38
93EB_SXR6
I totalled my XR6
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,193
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

I had a mate who owned a "4WD", I use quotation marks because it was a camp Nissan Xtrail...
he purposely aimed his fog lights upwards so that he could blind other drivers. Yes, he was a real air head.
__________________
93EB_SXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 09:33 PM   #39
lucas2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
lucas2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,011
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by MercurySilver View Post

so, what the hell is the speed limit after the END 80km sign then ???
It means the speed limit returns to the default limit for that type of road. For example, in a built up area it would return the speed limit to 50 km/h and on freeways or highways it would be 100km/h
lucas2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 20-12-2013, 10:03 PM   #40
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,706
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squish View Post
I found out the hard way the other day that the fine in NSW for having foglights on has gone up to $101. Used to be 80 something a few years ago when I was with a friend who was booked for the same (after the cop couldn't prove he'd been doing burnouts). Especially annoyed since it was raining and otherwise I was doing nothing wrong but heading to night shift. The sad part is that challenging it is such a hassle that I'll probably just pay it.
I fought and "won" this stupid fine back in 2011. It was a massive hassle and appearing before the magistrate saved me $4. The fine was $287, but the Victims of Crime Levy was $283 which is what I had to pay to stand before the magistrate. A huge moral victory for me, but was it worth it? It depends on how strong your convictions are on the matter.

Last edited by Cobra; 20-12-2013 at 10:14 PM.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-12-2013, 06:24 AM   #41
hedgehobb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 84
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by 93EB_SXR6 View Post
So you've never exceeded the speed limit in your life hedgehobb? Must be nice being so perfect.
So I suggest a way to keep to the speed limit with modern tech and now I'm an ahole. Ok.
hedgehobb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-12-2013, 07:42 AM   #42
DJR-351
I am Groot
Donating Member3
 
DJR-351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by hedgehobb View Post
So I suggest a way to keep to the speed limit with modern tech and now I'm an ahole. Ok.
Don't worry about it hedgehobb, for some around here if you are not continually accumulating speeding fines and demerit points you are doing something wrong, twisted logic.........
__________________
..
McLaren F1
Dick Johnson Racing

"Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe
DJR-351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 21-12-2013, 12:31 PM   #43
290v
290v
 
290v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,219
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

I get annoyed with the Rego pricing $X amount for a 4Cyl then $X amount for a 6Cyl then $X amount for an 8Cyl and then 4X4 rego, this costing goes back to the Jurassic days but these days a Turbo powered 4s & 6s are just as powerful most cars these days driven and take up the same amount of space on the Rd, the 3rd party section of the Rego is the killer because in the old days the V8 was the deemed as the most powerful of the vehicle option
__________________
BA GT 2003 Silhouette
4 Speed Auto
290v is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-12-2013, 02:22 PM   #44
irish2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Was driving towards a car pulled over on the opposite side of the road last night. Had his high beams on, so I flashed him. The high beams remained on, and as I got closer it was a police vehicle. Seems being considerate when driving does not apply to them.
irish2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-12-2013, 02:44 PM   #45
Tassie f100
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,878
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Sorry FlivverFord the 110 speed limits only apply to the Midland betwwen Perth and Bagdad and the Bass betwwen Launceston and Sulphur Creek.
Tassie f100 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-12-2013, 06:56 PM   #46
Squish
Regular Member
 
Squish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 187
Default

@Cobra I actually tried to request a review given the inclement weather at the time and I think I have a pretty strong case for leniency, but typically the website where you're supposed to lodge a review request hasn't worked once since I got the fine. Won't bother with court, especially after your story. Might give them a call before the expiry date for the review period and see if I can talk to someone who isn't a computer.
Squish is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-12-2013, 04:41 AM   #47
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,990
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

gets better....

MOTORISTS who fail to register their car will face fines of up to $2500 - the highest in the nation - from February, the State Government has announced.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/s...-1226788193574
pottery beige is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-12-2013, 07:08 AM   #48
eb2fairmont
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 838
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

The rah must be over budget or not enough taxpayers went to the cricket.

Oh hang on, in three years the only ****** employed will be the government.

Lets face it the sa government are the highest taxing and they wonder why businesses go interstate? Oh and let's not forget the second rate infrastructure.

Love living there though. Lol
eb2fairmont is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-12-2013, 10:16 AM   #49
GasoLane
Former BTIKD
Donating Member2
 
GasoLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnydep View Post
. One reason they had found is that contractors where leaving signs out to save time - packing up Friday, putting up on Monday.
This is 'normal' practice on NSW country road works.
Since the former RTA found it was cheaper to outsource the traffic control at roadwork sites to private contractors it's quite common to see signs left out 27/7.
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
GasoLane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-12-2013, 05:27 PM   #50
Squish
Regular Member
 
Squish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GasOLane View Post
This is 'normal' practice on NSW country road works.
Since the former RTA found it was cheaper to outsource the traffic control at roadwork sites to private contractors it's quite common to see signs left out 27/7.

Funny you should say that. One was left outside my house after roadworks were finished a couple years ago. After three months when they didn't come back to get it I took it inside. Didn't have any contact details on it or anything. It's still rolling around the shed somewhere.
Squish is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-12-2013, 05:34 PM   #51
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,826
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Talking about people blinding others with fog lights etc, what I really hate is people with aftermarket HIDs in reflectors designed for halogen lights, all it does is throw heaps of light EVERYWHERE ELSE but down the road.

Or 4x4s with 100W+ globes in their head lights, if its a ****** reflector, more powerful light isn't going to fix the problem, see E series Falcons, you could put a 10,000W light in those head lights and still not see **** just annoy other people.

I had this jacked up Hilux come the opposite direction to me and I thought his high beams are on, so I flashed him, he turned on his high beams, I turned on my high beams, I turned on my spot lights, he turned on his spot lights and no one won :(

Fog lights dont really bother me, they seem to be pointed down low to the ground, but its mainly Commodore drivers who drive around with them on I've noticed.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 23-12-2013, 12:55 PM   #52
zilo
BANNED
 
zilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Just got a present from SA POL.

One of our company cars went a bit late on a right turn arrow.

$416 fine
$60 levy....don't know what this is for??
$300 corporate fee....cause it's a company car?
$49 notice fee....this is the first notice !



Yes......$825 dollars !
zilo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2013, 01:15 PM   #53
johnydep
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
johnydep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 4,611
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by zilo View Post
Just got a present from SA POL.

One of our company cars went a bit late on a right turn arrow.

$416 fine
$60 levy....don't know what this is for??
$300 corporate fee....cause it's a company car?
$49 notice fee....this is the first notice !


Yes......$825 dollars !
It's for your safety
__________________
The true danger only occurs when you take a potentially dangerous piece of machinery
and place it in the hands of the most unpredictable species on the planet.
Human behaviour, as history has catalogued, cannot account for what any persons actions may be,
especially concerning their love of the motor vehicle.

http://www.fireservicecollege.ac.uk
johnydep is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 23-12-2013, 02:11 PM   #54
Squish
Regular Member
 
Squish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Wow...
Squish is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2013, 11:19 AM   #55
danzvtil
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
danzvtil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,629
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlivverFord View Post
Speaking of posted speed limit signs, here in Tas' they seem to "move" quite a bit...literally!

Since I moved back here in '09 I've seen at least a dozen signs either move a few hundred metres along the road or disappear altogether.
I also dislike "END 80" signs on rural roads. Speed camera got me a beaut' in my first month back here. As the state limit is 110kph I simply assumed that's what I could do after driving past one of those signs. $130 fine told me it's not!

Just recently I drove to Port Sorell from Ulverstone to take my boat out. Local council has decided that now (xmas time) is the perfect time for road works!
From the boat ramp heading back to Devonport it starts like this... 50kph, then 60, then 80, then "end 80", then 80-60-40 for road works, then back to 60, 80 then another "end 80".
All in the space of less than 20 kilometres. What ridiculous rubbish!
I could think of harsher words!

What's worse than a committee........a council funded committee!
END 80 signs are too ambiguous if they go to the effort of putting a sign up surely it can display the ACTUAL speed of the zone you are in!
__________________
____________________

2024 TOYOTA HIACE
2019 LDV G10-GONE THANKFULLY
2009 Mitsubishi Express-GONE
2011 Honda Jazz
____________________
danzvtil is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2013, 06:16 PM   #56
CheftonUTD
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 170
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

I've got no problem with people being fined for intentionally breaking the road rules or driving unsafely.
It does annoy me though that the majority of the 'enforcement' I see is things like speed-cameras parked along roads where the speed limit changes every few kilometers. Sure, you make more easy money fining people coasting down from 100-80kph after the sign, but I feel a lot less safe from drivers on their phones or drifting across lanes/cutting through roundabouts than someone doing ~10kph over on a highway...
It'd be better to get the reckless/arrogant drivers off the road, but I suppose a parked camera is a lot more cost-efficient than paying a bunch of cops in unmarked cars to catch-out fewer drivers.
CheftonUTD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2013, 10:02 PM   #57
zoesgift
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,875
Default Re: fines for traffic offences suggest South Australia’s regime is revenue raising

what annoys me is people all day on xmas day doing 10 to 15kmh LESS than the speed limit, what is with that?people have been emotionally scared by copping a fine like the one posted above.
zoesgift is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL