Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2006, 09:09 PM   #1
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default AU vs BA!

I know there has been about a billion threads on this, but every time I drive a BA I just can't help but feel it's almost a downgrade from an AU!

I regularly drive my brothers BA XR8 and need to drive BA's at work fairly often, and every time I do, I can't help but notice the cheap and tacky dashboards, the low grade plastics, the MUCH heavier feel of the BA, lack of response from the 6's, heavier steering, and the list goes on!

Then there's the fact that practically every BA I drive has squeaky rattly interiors and I know my brothers has been back under warranty for a heap of things, yet my 170k old AU is still quiet and squeak free and has had nothing go wrong in 1.5 years of ownership.

I know I'm biased being an AU owner but I'm also not blind enough to understand why to many the BA is a huge upgrade.

Does anyone else out there feel the same way?

private9 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:10 PM   #2
Dark Horse
_Oo===oO_
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,471
Default

Ford V Ford, what is the point????
__________________
COURAGE - ENDURANCE - MATESHIP - SACRIFICE
Dark Horse is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:17 PM   #3
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Horse
Ford V Ford, what is the point????
Simply commenting that is all. I know that the BA/F has been a success story for Ford especially compared to the AU, but to me most BA's I've driven simply don't feel as well built as the AU's I've driven.
private9 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:24 PM   #4
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Your comments are spot-on mate. Sadly with the extra weight the BA picked up it does feel slower off the mark. However at higher speeds, engine and car, they are actually quicker. Also the build quality for some reason seems lower. I too have driven a lot of BAs that are full of rattles. The BA does have a lot of technology above the AU but unfortunately this has not been delivered into a much better car. My personal preference for interiors also puts the AU ahead. In fact I even prefer the EF/EL interiors over the BA. I hope the new model brings some improvements. However the BA doesn't have to compete with the AU for sales - just the Commodes - and we know how crappy their interiors are!
T3man is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:33 PM   #5
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3man
Your comments are spot-on mate. Sadly with the extra weight the BA picked up it does feel slower off the mark. However at higher speeds, engine and car, they are actually quicker. Also the build quality for some reason seems lower. I too have driven a lot of BAs that are full of rattles. The BA does have a lot of technology above the AU but unfortunately this has not been delivered into a much better car. My personal preference for interiors also puts the AU ahead. In fact I even prefer the EF/EL interiors over the BA. I hope the new model brings some improvements. However the BA doesn't have to compete with the AU for sales - just the Commodes - and we know how crappy their interiors are!
Absolutely, the VY-VZ interior in particular is absolutely terrible!

Did forget to mention that yeah the BA is definitely quicker once you're up and running but pottering around it just feels slower and seems to lumber about with it's heavy steering.

I think I almost agree with you too about preferring the EF-L interiors over the BA, they certainly do remind me of an early 80's type effort that is going to look terribly cheap and outdated in 10 years time.
private9 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:59 PM   #6
GK
Walking with God
 
GK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,321
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

The line moves quicker with the assembly of the BA than it did with the AU. This is what I've heard, I'm yet to hear someone who's worked on assembling both cars verify this though!

The slower line allows more care!

Can anyone confirm this?

GK
__________________
2009 Mondeo Zetec TDCi - Moondust Silver

2015 Kia Sorento Platinum - Snow White Pearl

2001 Ducati Monster 900Sie - Red

Now gone!
1999 AU1 Futura Wagon - Sparkling Burgundy
On LPG



Want a Full Life? John 10:10
GK is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:08 PM   #7
GlennBA
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
GlennBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,918
Default

They're both nice cars to drive. I find ba's a lot smoother and refined, and so they should be... newer model.
RE quality... dads XR6T is 2 weeks out of warranty and has developed an ABS/TCS fault where abs engages when slightly braking, radiator has started leaking, handbrake no longer holds the car, violent idle as if its misfiring sometimes and foglight has blown. Stupid thing.. and he's stuck with the pos till november 2007.
GlennBA is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:10 PM   #8
HLC
Audi S3
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
Default

my dads BA XR8 compared to my AU2 Fairmont is like chalk and cheese.

the stance, the power, the feel, the sound. my dads car craps all over mine. my only gripe is the tacky texture on the door trims. feels heaps cheap, but other than that, i'd drive my dads BA any day of the week.
__________________
HLC is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:12 PM   #9
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GK
The line moves quicker with the assembly of the BA than it did with the AU. This is what I've heard, I'm yet to hear someone who's worked on assembling both cars verify this though!

The slower line allows more care!

Can anyone confirm this?

GK
I've heard the same thing too GK but not from the horses mouth.

It does make sense when you think about it though.
private9 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:33 PM   #10
ronwest
All Bran = Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BrizVegas
Posts: 1,970
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

I have access to a BA XR6 (and fuel card) for long trips.

This year I have driven it on three occasions for a total in excess of 13,000kms.
1. Bris - Atherton - Barcaldine - Bris.
2. Bris - Syd - Melb - Portland - Adel - Dubbo - Bris
3. Bris - Gunnedah - Jenolan Caves - Canberra - Dubbo - Bris

Also this year, I have driven my AU3 F/Ghia around 10,000 kms on trips
Bris - Kempsey a few times.
Bris - Syd
Bris - Mackay
Bris - Mundubbera a couple of times
Various trips to the Sunshine/Gold Coasts

I know we're not comparing apples and apples but there is no way that I would swap the later model XR6 for my F/Ghia.

There are a few reasons but it gets down to levels of noise, finish, comfort and aesthetics (I really dislike all the plastic in the BA.)

I'm sure if I didn't have the opportunity to compare the two, I'd be more than happy to own a BA XR6.

Fortunately I have the opportunity ;)

The BA on the Great Ocean Rd - July '06
ronwest is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:40 PM   #11
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default

One other thing, BA XT's don't even hafe a foot rest! My 95 EF has got one - progress?

While BA's certainly have their good points, and the public has certainly voted with their feet, to my tastes there are just a few too many things that feel like they have been downgraded.

However as ronwest put it, if I hadn't had the chance to compare the 2, then I'd probably be content with a BA.
private9 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:36 PM   #12
OZFORDAU
Banned
 
OZFORDAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,318
Default Ba

I'd rather own a BA over my AU ANYDAY! Id have one with the same mods!

I love them!

They drive really well and are really comfortable and i love the interors!

Cheers

Simon
OZFORDAU is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:42 PM   #13
Deadman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Deadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,490
Default

Always a useless topic because it's like bickering brothers, but anyway, I've got some spare time :P

I'm far from a brand loyalist, I just like nice cars. I'll just say AU's put me off Ford, BA's brought me back. "I'd never buy an AU (except for a T-series)" and "I'd never buy anything but a BA" were my two experiences with both models (and I drove everything from a Forte to a TS50, XT to GT-P so it wasn't just a short experience in either).

There's going to be people who think along the same lines, and those that don't. I guess the only thing that will ever seperate the two arguments are the sales results which ultimately indicate that more people wanted BA's. That doesn't proove they are better (no one will ever proove to everyone that one is better than the other) it just shows which one was wanted more.

So yeah, I try to stay neutral as I have no dramas with people who love AU's and complain about BA's - that's their opinion and I respect that. I do laugh though when they say the BA dash looks cheap compared to the AU, I must have been looking at some other car for all those years I guess...

They've both got pro's and con's, and everyone has different tastes.
Deadman is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:43 PM   #14
RIPGMH
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
RIPGMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,051
Default

I have one of each, and I think the BA's interior design is miles ahead of the AU's. The AU in standard form at least just screams TAXI! The AU series 1 had the ugliest interior I have ever seen.
RIPGMH is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:51 PM   #15
I FluXx I
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,455
Default

I have a ba Futura for me and my work car is a AU series 3. I freakin hate the AU. Not only does it look like its been punched in the face but it drives like a poo on wheels. My Ba has a stack more power, it handles better because of the heavy steering, It has more options with the trip computer, the whole car looks better inside and out and its quieter.

The AU looks all plastic and everything is round. Why did Ford think that people would like that??? The buttons on the steering wheel are crap and feel cheap, and the make a clicking noise when you press them. Plus there is no cruise controll. And the gear leaver rattles and moves around when driving.

Honestly, if the AU was actually a good car I would say good things about it. I think the AU was fords biggest misstake.
__________________
BF MK1 RAPID F6 TORNADO, LEATHER, BREMBOS, FPV WHEEL, HARD COVER-304rwkw

Performance mods: SL's(front) and leveled at the back, Front 30mm whiteline sway bar, 4" dump, 4" cat, 3.5" exhaust split to Dual 2.5" with quad tips, Plazmaman stage 1 polished intercooler and piping kit, 60lb injectors, Walbro fuel pump, upgraded actuator, GFB BOV, K&N panel filter

Mods for show: 19" black Speedy Inferno rims, MTX 5x7's front and rear, 2x Kenwood 4ch amps, 3x Kenwood 10" subs, chrome fuse box cover
I FluXx I is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:53 PM   #16
private9
www.TUFFCARPARTS.com
 
private9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
I have one of each, and I think the BA's interior design is miles ahead of the AU's. The AU in standard form at least just screams TAXI! The AU series 1 had the ugliest interior I have ever seen.
I do agree, to my tastes the AU does have an interesting looking interior! I'm merely talking about my opinion of the quality of the interior more than appearance.
private9 is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 12:08 AM   #17
Cheahman
BOSS 260
 
Cheahman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 325
Default

Cant say I agree with you. I went from a au xr6 to a ba xr8 and there is no way the au is even close to the ba. The only thing my au had going for it was the handling which felt abit better. The au has one of the most ugly interiors ever and Im so happy I dont have to look at that fish bowl anymore. The ba is quieter, smoother, faster and i reckon the build quality is just as good. Thats my 2cents.
__________________
"And I gave that man directions, even though I didn't know the way, because that's the kind of guy I am this week." Homer

BA XR8
EB XR8
Cheahman is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 12:09 AM   #18
Ford_Boy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ford_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 613
Default

ba looks way cooler. but i really love the t series. they looks so mean. interior is way nicer in a ba. it feels more roomy too. i hate the au xr head lights, its kind of like a celica.
__________________
YOU 'RE A TOOL RICK YOU CHEATER.
ALL HAIL LOWNDES, THE TRUE CHAMPION!
Ford_Boy is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 12:24 AM   #19
Joes_meat
Churches Eat Souls
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 202
Default

From what I've heard, the quality of the B series has been steadily improving since the first BA.

The BF mkII's are meant to be pretty good overall.

I guess it's the same with any new model.
Joes_meat is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 12:28 AM   #20
Doogstar
B-Series Moderator
 
Doogstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 3,658
Default

I owned an AUII before my BA. I gotta say the plastic in the interior was much softer in the AU and the AU had the sunglass holder, but In ALL other respects my BA is heaps better. I've never once heard a rattle in mine. I stll like AU's though.
__________________
BF MKII XR6 Turbo 2007 (Flare) ZF Auto

380rwkw - 11.68 @ 120.94mph 60ft=1.97
Custom Tune, Exhaust. injectors.1.2K Plazmaman 1.2K Plenum kit

Now with bigger turbo and 426rwkw.
Doogstar is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 01:18 AM   #21
XR8-260
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,558
Default

The BA interior is way nicer. Even the base XT is decent. The AU interior is rather "odd" in a ford taurus kind of way. I admit that the build quality is rather lacking in the BA range though...
XR8-260 is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 01:27 AM   #22
mongoloid
chuck miller ford texas
 
mongoloid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kalgoorlie
Posts: 386
Default

I really feel this comparison comes down to the fact that for most people and almost all young people your car is your biggest asset, and given the particular one you own (AU or BA) you want a little bit of reassurance you made a good desicion. I was recently directly comparing BA vs AU and i ended up going AU, so i want to hear positive things about that model.
mongoloid is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 01:30 AM   #23
ronwest
All Bran = Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BrizVegas
Posts: 1,970
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadman
There's going to be people who think along the same lines, and those that don't. I guess the only thing that will ever seperate the two arguments are the sales results which ultimately indicate that more people wanted BA's. That doesn't proove they are better (no one will ever proove to everyone that one is better than the other) it just shows which one was wanted more.
Which isn't always a good indicator, otherwise we'd have to admit that Commodores are somehow or other superior, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadman
They've both got pro's and con's, and everyone has different tastes.
Yes, at the end of the day that's what it gets down to. In the last 15 years I've driven two Fords (the two I mentioned above) so I'm no real judge.

It just may be that if I test drove a BA or BF Fairmont Ghia I would be suitably impressed.
ronwest is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:07 AM   #24
fordAU
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Can Do Land
Posts: 332
Default

Both the BA and AU are lacking in build quality.

Last Fords I owned that were very good in this area were both E-series, an EB Fairmont and EL XR6, both better built than my AUXR8 but neither as fun to drive.

Can't comment on the BF but the BA I drive on a daily basis is a heap of junk, very bad build quality as compared to say an EF/EL.
fordAU is offline  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:11 AM   #25
Casper
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Contributing Member
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
Default

This thread really isnt going to go any where. Started with good intentions I accept, but its going to degrade into a shouting match at some stage.
Both cars have their loyalists and both have their place in history. In 20 years it will be interesting to see what (if either) car is more desirable.
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer.


Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
Casper is offline  
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL