|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-05-2007, 01:38 AM | #31 | ||
Young !@#$ Head
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 796
|
the 351 block has more metal in it. A stock 302 block will crack if you try and run anymore than around 450hp through it. So ive been told anyway i could be wrong!
|
||
11-05-2007, 02:21 AM | #32 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
|
i've been told by reliable sources that the blocks are the same
|
||
11-05-2007, 02:49 AM | #33 | ||
Young !@#$ Head
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 796
|
ill have to check that out. This will save me sourcing a late model 351 roller block. Cheers for that!!
|
||
11-05-2007, 05:48 AM | #34 | ||
Clevor Coupe
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Frankston
Posts: 52
|
sorry to pry guys but i`m 99 % sure the 351 is 1inch taller block, and your right about the torque, i have a 351 windsor with 302 closed chambered cleveland heads in my xc coupe and the sheet says 166.4rwkw @ 723Nm torque but only prob is the sheet dosn`t say rev range. love to have that power in my 5litre au xls..mick.
|
||
11-05-2007, 08:01 AM | #35 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
|
Yes I have done the deed and droped the 351 in my AU XR. It can be done, it isnt hard. Their are now a few floating around, the added cubic inches is very welcome and next time I will be going a stroker 351 up to say 408 or thereabouts, Ive dont mine for club and race use rather than street us but still easy to do, I ran it on the street with efi in its last guise.
Dont mind sharing all I know so send me a pm or fire some questions here. I've got pics of mine with all the EFI gear on it as well if you would like to see these, you only have a few manifolds to choose from being the GT40 lower, TFS lower and a couple others, you need to think big as airflow is 20% greater than a 302 from the start as well. Quote:
Last edited by Sledgehammer; 11-05-2007 at 08:11 AM. |
|||
11-05-2007, 08:02 AM | #36 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
|
Quote:
Yes correct, 1 inch taller. |
|||
11-05-2007, 08:05 AM | #37 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
|
Quote:
I would not use a 351 roller block they are not the same. I used an early read 1969 block for the added strength. The real advantage over the 302 block is better rods, main caps thicker, 1/2 inch head bolts used, generally more metal etc but at a cost - weight. If you are on an unlimited budget use an aftermarket block like a dart as the base, otherwise you will have to see what you can find the '51 blocks are not everywhere these days. Blocks are also wider in the valley, compared to 302, so anyone whos knows what they are looking at will see this straight away. Last edited by Sledgehammer; 11-05-2007 at 08:15 AM. |
|||
11-05-2007, 08:33 AM | #38 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle W.A
Posts: 661
|
Quote:
__________________
Losing my patients with unfinished threads Did the ideas people helped you with work or not! |
|||
11-05-2007, 09:32 AM | #39 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 364
|
the mains in the 351w are 3inch and i think the 302w has smaller mains
__________________
MR INCH
|
||
13-05-2007, 01:10 PM | #40 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
|
Quote:
Quote:
CID Block Bore OverBore Crank Stroke RodLength Notes 314 302 4 0.03 302 3.075 5.205 Offset grind crank to 3.075 / Likely uses turbo 4 cylinder rods 400 horsepower maximum 319 302 4 0.03 302 3.125 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.125 / 500 horsepower maximum 331 302 4 0.03 302 3.242 5.2 Offset grind crank to 3.240 / Likely uses 1.9L 4 cylinder rods 400 horsepower maximum 337 302 4 0.03 351W 3.3 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.3 342 302 4 0.03 351W 3.35 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.350 342 302 4 0.03 351W 3.35 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.35 347 302 4 0.03 351W 3.4 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.400 / or use Summit SES-5-52-05-000 or Trick Flow crank TFS-55325360 with Summit SES-5-44-05-201 rod 357 302 4 0.03 351W 3.5 5.4 372 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.64 6.2 Offset grind crank to 3.640 / 600 horsepower maximum 375 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.68 6.125 Offset grind crank to 3.680 / Likely uses Chrysler 340/360 rods 575 horsepower maximum 377 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.7 6.2 Offset grind crank to 3.70 / 550 horsepower maximum 393 351W 4 0.03 400M 3.85 6.209 Offset grind crank to 3.850 / Will not require cylinder bore notching No mallory metal required for balancing Users Chrysler 340/360 rods. |
||||
13-05-2007, 03:24 PM | #41 | ||
Audi S3
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
|
that bonnet buldge/scoop looks sweet.
__________________
|
||
13-05-2007, 04:32 PM | #42 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hallam
Posts: 1,897
|
Be prepared to do bonnet mods as well due to block height of the 351w compared to the 302w
|
||
13-05-2007, 05:19 PM | #43 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
|
Gotta love a bonnet scoop on an AU, they just set them off nicely.
|
||