|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-07-2007, 02:31 PM | #31 | ||
Merry Xmas To All
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melton South, Moderator: ORSM Club
Posts: 3,413
|
I have said this before, and will again. Cameras are the Government's ZERO Tolerance approach to a traffic law system with a financial benefit. If they lower the road toll, then come upsmelling good. If they don't, they tighten other areas. The power to vote your opinion is just that, and no matter who gets in the big chair, do you really think they'll cut such a simple money maker? That fact is, we will continue to take it up the tailpipe, for as long as we drive a car. With the Oil companies pricing fiasco, the Government's perpetual quest for cash, I think investing in KY would be shrewd.
|
||
06-07-2007, 02:36 PM | #32 | |||
Merry Xmas To All
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melton South, Moderator: ORSM Club
Posts: 3,413
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-07-2007, 03:11 PM | #33 | |||
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
In this specific instance, if we had a motorists advocacy group who wasnt useless, corrupt and incompetant, they would be lobbying the Federal Government who create the ADRs to act on state laws that run contrary to the spirit of those federal laws. Given the Liberal Federal Government would love an opportunity to show up the Labor State governments who have taken us down this path, im surprised it hasnt been addressed yet. Oh wait. I forgot. They are saving my life. Today Tonight told me so.
__________________
1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan 1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack 2003 BA Fairlane G220 Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM |
|||
06-07-2007, 05:00 PM | #34 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
|
Quote:
For comparison, most guages such as pressure guages are rated as a percentage of full scale deflection, with 1.5% of FSD being the norm and 0.5% of FSD being a very expensive gauge with a mirror background so that you can see that you are looking at the needle at the correct angle. If we were to apply 1.5% of FSD to a typical 240 km/h speedo, we get an accuracy of +/-3.6 km/h. |
|||
06-07-2007, 08:17 PM | #35 | |||
You gotta pay to play
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hampton Park Victoria
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
between Rushworth & Tatura (country Victoria) there is a 30 km speed limit sign this is a normal sign not an advisory speed limit sign.
__________________
Regards Gilesie AU I Forte Wagon 4.0 Dodge D5N Twincab (Project) 2003 Mazda Bravo (work truck) 1979 F100 Ambo |
|||
06-07-2007, 10:39 PM | #36 | |||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,699
|
Quote:
those are old laws can't remember where i read about it being illegal for a cars speedo to read less than road speed, but google found this article. http://www.trafficlaw.com.au/speedos.html |
|||
06-07-2007, 10:48 PM | #37 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 735
|
We do need the revenue to fund pointless tram extensions :
|
||
07-07-2007, 06:38 AM | #38 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven
Posts: 3,161
|
A Ford executive who contributed to this forum (Territory) some time ago told us that Ford set its speedometers to slightly over-read - presumably to help save us from infringements.
__________________
Officially Fordless |
||
07-07-2007, 10:28 AM | #39 | ||
growing up is optional
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gawler area SA
Posts: 3,303
|
Im sure most manufacturers would make them read fast to avoid litigation.
Every Ford Ive ever owned read faster than the true road speed. Ive been thinking about mounting a GPS on the dash, but would probably get done for obstruction of vision! |
||
07-07-2007, 11:41 AM | #40 | |||
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
For example. My 1965 XP was built before ADRs were even created let alone this agreement. Plenty of cars here predate the UN agreements. The cars built before their acceptance had to comply with ADR 18, the law of the land at the time, and thats ALL they have to comply with in regards to speedometers. The UN Agreements are primarily designed to govern imports really and provide a level ground of quality and safety if I recall correctly. In regards to "Old Laws" their is no such thing in regards to ADR's. The ones on the vehicle plate, are the ones you have to comply with. They cant revise them retrospectively or 3/4 of the cars on the road would have to be taken off. They can only legislate for new cars built after Date XXXX in regards to ADR's.
__________________
1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan 1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack 2003 BA Fairlane G220 Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM |
|||