Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Focus

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-08-2007, 11:27 AM   #1
fordel
Tricolore Tard
Contributing Member
 
fordel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,954
Default Myths

I got this in a Ford email newsletter that I dont even remember subscribing too.

BUSTING THE CAR MYTHS

With car technology advancing in leaps and bounds since its humble beginnings, we thought it would be a good time to confirm or deny some of the many old mechanics tales that get passed around over the years.

MYTH 1: You can drive a long way on empty.

TRUTH: Each vehicle will vary, but you should be able to drive five-ten kilometers safely with an “empty” signal showing. It’s not a good idea to do this regularly as it starves your engine of fuel and increases the risk of vapour lock, particularly in the summer months.

MYTH 2: You should always warm up your car.

TRUTH: The days of leaving a car running for five minutes on a frosty morning are over thankfully, but it’s still a good idea to give your car some time to warm up. This allows the oil to circulate through the engine.

MYTH 3: It's best to shift an automatic transmission into neutral at red lights.

TRUTH: This myth stems from the idea that keeping the transmission in drive while stepping on the brake wastes fuel and causes unnecessary wear on the driveline. Actual engine wear and fuel loss are minimal.


__________________
fordel is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 02:59 PM   #2
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordel
This allows the oil to circulate through the engine.
This bit always amuses me, as I've read it in a few places. What?, the oil is not circulating for the first few minutes? Oil pump not working? Takes a good few minutes to get right around the engine does it? Oil just "sits there" 'til it can be bothered moving? LOL
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 03:28 PM   #3
zetec
Zoom Zoom
 
zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,352
Default

The only real reason for a warm up period is not flogging the car when the oil is still warming up as it offers better protection when it's at operating temperature as we all know. The major area that suffers is gearbox, always good not to flog a car out of the parking lot straight away but just give it a few gearchanges to let everything warm up.
__________________
2012 Mazda3 MPS
zetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 03:40 PM   #4
fordel
Tricolore Tard
Contributing Member
 
fordel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by melbzetec
This bit always amuses me, as I've read it in a few places. What?, the oil is not circulating for the first few minutes? Oil pump not working? Takes a good few minutes to get right around the engine does it? Oil just "sits there" 'til it can be bothered moving? LOL
Yep it just sits there and yawns, doesnt want to move :P

I didnt write these, just copy and pasted from an email i got, so dont blame me
__________________
fordel is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 03:47 PM   #5
weenie
Regular Member
 
weenie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 134
Default

Have you ever started a 351 cleveland up & seen how long it takes idleing before the oil comes out the top of the rocker when cold starting???????? :
weenie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 04:23 PM   #6
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by weenie
Have you ever started a 351 cleveland up & seen how long it takes idleing before the oil comes out the top of the rocker when cold starting???????? :
if you read the post, we are talking about modern cars.
Quote:
With car technology advancing in leaps and bounds since its humble beginnings, we thought it would be a good time to confirm or deny some of the many old mechanics tales that get passed around over the years.
and most probably focusing on small cars. we dont care about v8's or 6's in here sorry.

We are not disputing that old cars may take longer to warm up, but simply, newer cars with technology dont needs as long. :
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 05:07 PM   #7
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zetec
The only real reason for a warm up period is not flogging the car when the oil is still warming up as it offers better protection when it's at operating temperature as we all know. The major area that suffers is gearbox, always good not to flog a car out of the parking lot straight away but just give it a few gearchanges to let everything warm up.
I read somewhere the other day, that the Zetec is designed to run with the oil at a minimum of 100 degrees C. Below that temperature creates greater wear.

ps Fordel...not having a go at you... just this "give time for the oil to circulate" amused me

And I do care about V8's!!
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 05:16 PM   #8
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
We are not disputing that old cars may take longer to warm up, but simply, newer cars with technology dont needs as long. :
Do they warm up faster because they use newer laws of physics?
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 05:25 PM   #9
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xbgs351
Do they warm up faster because they use newer laws of physics?
No, they warm up quicker because of new technology. Also the size.

i doubt the New GT falcon Engines take as long to warm up as the old V8 engines in the XB falcon? or the XW/Y?
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-08-2007, 05:48 PM   #10
fordel
Tricolore Tard
Contributing Member
 
fordel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by melbzetec
I read somewhere the other day, that the Zetec is designed to run with the oil at a minimum of 100 degrees C. Below that temperature creates greater wear.

ps Fordel...not having a go at you... just this "give time for the oil to circulate" amused me

And I do care about V8's!!
Yeah i know you aren't mate

I care about V8's too and 6's for that matter ;)
__________________
fordel is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 12:11 AM   #11
Piotr
Non-Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xbgs351
Do they warm up faster because they use newer laws of physics?
No, but we have aluminium blocks and better oil and coolant flow from better design
Piotr is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 09:57 AM   #12
whippet_zetec
Supes
 
whippet_zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
and most probably focusing on small cars. we dont care about v8's or 6's in here sorry.
Am sure the email posted by Chris is a "general" email relating to ALL cars...and I suggest you speak for yourself about caring about V8's or 6's....you may not but like some others I sure do.
__________________
Yes I DO drive a Toyota
whippet_zetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 10:42 AM   #13
zetec
Zoom Zoom
 
zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,352
Default

Before this turns into a slog fest, any car running a lower viscosity of oil, especially a fully synthetic will warm up quicker and more evenly and the better oil protects engine in this cooler stage. A Big V8 run on fully synth will be better protected, but then you have additional issues of the oil being too thin for the high pressure high rpm of a big engine and ;eaking out of the seals. The only reasons this has changed nowadays is due to better oils, nothing to do with the size of the engine! Each engine has a correct weight of oil that will protect it for life.
__________________
2012 Mazda3 MPS
zetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 11:08 AM   #14
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whippet_zetec
Am sure the email posted by Chris is a "general" email relating to ALL cars...and I suggest you speak for yourself about caring about V8's or 6's....you may not but like some others I sure do.
sorry tod, was assuming that beeing in the small car segment we where only talking about 4cl cars, and didnt worry about the bigger V6's and V8's in here.
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 12:03 PM   #15
More revs
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 551
Default

To avoid arguments I always avoid intangible words like 'better'....

Don't you agree it's a better position?


lol
More revs is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 12:06 PM   #16
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by More revs
To avoid arguments I always avoid intangible words like 'better'....

Don't you agree it's a better position?


lol
LOL.... hehe
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 01:18 PM   #17
Ringo
I see you....
 
Ringo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xbgs351
Do they warm up faster because they use newer laws of physics?
I don't know that anyone actually understood your comment XBGS351...

Makes my top 10 posts of 2007....
Ringo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 01:21 PM   #18
Ringo
I see you....
 
Ringo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 989
Default

And has now become my signature.....
Ringo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-08-2007, 04:48 PM   #19
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

No...actually got it. Just ignored it.
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-09-2007, 07:42 PM   #20
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
No, they warm up quicker because of new technology. Also the size.

i doubt the New GT falcon Engines take as long to warm up as the old V8 engines in the XB falcon? or the XW/Y?
I wouldn't bet on it. The mod motors are on the porky side, they still have an iron block, and they still have a good volume of oil and water to heat up.

Now let us consider a Zetec vs a Kent. The Zetec is primarily made of aluminium and iron. The Kent is primarily made of iron. The Zetec weighs about 30% less than a Kent, mainly because of the use of aluminium in place of iron. Both motors have a similar volume of oil and coolant to heat. Now aluminium has a Specific Heat Capacity of 0.897 [J/gK)] compared to iron which has a Specific Heat Capacity of 0.450 [J/gK]. As Q = m c ΔT, where Q = heat, m = mass, c = Specific Heat Capacity and ΔT is the change in temperature, it is clear that aluminium takes twices as much heat to warm up a certain amount than iron does. With aluminium having a higher specific capacity than iron by 200%, there is no way that a reduction in engine weight of 30% is going to counteract it.

So why not face the facts? Newer technology does not make engines warm up faster, it just makes them less cantankerous to drive when they are not fully warmed up.
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-09-2007, 08:28 PM   #21
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xbgs351
I wouldn't bet on it. The mod motors are on the porky side, they still have an iron block, and they still have a good volume of oil and water to heat up.

Now let us consider a Zetec vs a Kent. The Zetec is primarily made of aluminium and iron. The Kent is primarily made of iron. The Zetec weighs about 30% less than a Kent, mainly because of the use of aluminium in place of iron. Both motors have a similar volume of oil and coolant to heat. Now aluminium has a Specific Heat Capacity of 0.897 [J/gK)] compared to iron which has a Specific Heat Capacity of 0.450 [J/gK]. As Q = m c ΔT, where Q = heat, m = mass, c = Specific Heat Capacity and ΔT is the change in temperature, it is clear that aluminium takes twices as much heat to warm up a certain amount than iron does. With aluminium having a higher specific capacity than iron by 200%, there is no way that a reduction in engine weight of 30% is going to counteract it.

So why not face the facts? Newer technology does not make engines warm up faster, it just makes them less cantankerous to drive when they are not fully warmed up.
How is it clear that alluminium takes longer to heat up??? i couldnt read your psycho bable..!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo
I don't know that anyone actually understood your comment XBGS351...

Makes my top 10 posts of 2007....
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"


Last edited by photn; 14-09-2007 at 08:36 PM.
photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-09-2007, 09:19 PM   #22
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
How is it clear that alluminium takes longer to heat up??? i couldnt read your psycho bable..!!!!
It's not psycho bable, it's plain and simple physics.

Here is the kindergarten version:



Starting with the basic formula
Q = m c ΔT

We want to calculate the change in temperature (ΔT), so we rearrange the formula to this:

ΔT = Q /m c

Heat = Q Lets assume that we add 1000 Joules of heat.
Mass = m Lets assume that the aluminium and iron weigh 100 grams.

Aluminium
Specific Heat Capacity = c = 0.897

ΔT = Q /m c = 1000/(100 x 0.897) = 11.15 degrees Celsius

Iron
Specific Heat Capacity = c = 0.450

ΔT = Q /m c = 1000/(100 x 0.457) = 21.89 degrees Celsius


Is that clear enough? Perhaps try wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_ca...#Heat_capacity
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-09-2007, 09:45 PM   #23
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xbgs351
It's not psycho bable, it's plain and simple physics.

Here is the kindergarten version:



Starting with the basic formula
Q = m c ΔT

We want to calculate the change in temperature (ΔT), so we rearrange the formula to this:

ΔT = Q /m c

Heat = Q Lets assume that we add 1000 Joules of heat.
Mass = m Lets assume that the aluminium and iron weigh 100 grams.

Aluminium
Specific Heat Capacity = c = 0.897

ΔT = Q /m c = 1000/(100 x 0.897) = 11.15 degrees Celsius

Iron
Specific Heat Capacity = c = 0.450

ΔT = Q /m c = 1000/(100 x 0.457) = 21.89 degrees Celsius


Is that clear enough? Perhaps try wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_ca...#Heat_capacity
Thank you!!!!

Much more clearer.. and im sorry that i didnt do Phsyics at school :P
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-09-2007, 09:49 PM   #24
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photn
Thank you!!!!

Much more clearer.. and im sorry that i didnt do Phsyics at school :P
Your welcome.
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-09-2007, 07:56 AM   #25
mudwaa
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 107
Default

the only problem with the formula is the unequal mass.
cast iron is 7800kg per cubic metre
aluminium only 2700 per cubic metre
mudwaa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-09-2007, 01:27 PM   #26
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Woops!
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-09-2007, 09:41 PM   #27
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwaa
the only problem with the formula is the unequal mass.
cast iron is 7800kg per cubic metre
aluminium only 2700 per cubic metre
But you need more of it as it isn't as strong. Besides, I already covered the issue when I stated that a Zetec is around 30% lighter than a Kent.
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-09-2007, 09:50 AM   #28
mudwaa
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 107
Default

yes i saw that but you didnt use that in the formula, nor did you take into account that the thermal conductivity of aluminium is .50 whilst that of iron is .163. In reality there are many things to consider. metal conductivity, area of material (engine block),
and barrier (wall thickness).Also consider that internal friction is the primary cause of heat and that you have coolant running between the inner and outer walls of the engine block acting to dissipate that heat.So really you have two formulas. One for conductivity arising from internal friction and the other for dissipation from the cooling system doing its job. On that note its completely bewildering to me and i think engine designers are absolute geniuses.
mudwaa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-09-2007, 02:12 PM   #29
Piotr
Non-Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

Its pretty common knowledge that aluminium engine are faster to warm-up.
Piotr is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL