Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-03-2008, 10:41 PM   #61
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

AUs design is coherent, but polarizing.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2008, 01:08 AM   #62
IDT
Marko
 
IDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth W.A
Posts: 430
Default

"sources familiar with Ford plans" blah blah blah
__________________
Mark
IDT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2008, 03:10 PM   #63
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
But these are the reasons why Ford Aust is helping with the global platform, so they have a cheap IRS and a platform to build a better car on...it not that hard to comprehend. :
Interesting quote from Wheels, which is only just an opinion, but interesting.

"Can any replacement Mustang afford the new rear drive platform, when the best selling V6 version starts at less than US$20k."

That's the sort of thing that makes me so cynical about the new RWD platform, because it will need to be very cheap to manufacture to be able to be used in Mustang. To be able to be cheaply manufactured then means they will have to cut corners on design and materials to make it cheap and easy to make, so no aluminium suspension bits like the FG has. If the platform was solely to be used in Lincolns and Crown Vic as well as Falcon it wouldn't bother me so much, but a cut price budget platform isn't what the Falcon needs. Or maybe they will have 2 versions just like they did for the DEW98 platform, where the Jag S type had all the expensive alloy bits while the Lincoln LS and Thunderbird had a cheaper version.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2008, 03:14 PM   #64
SpoolMan
Solution Was Boost 4?, 6 & 8
 
SpoolMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23,624
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF events and sponsorship. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Everything you do to help this place run smoothly! Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: The awesome Technical and Service how to's in the FPV /XR6 /G6ET turbo threads..  and his own build threads that inspire people to have a go... enabling people to save money and realise the dream of working on their own cars as well. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
The Australian Designed AU can't be too bad, after all the Merc CLS has a AU Boot and Lights...

...Au was ahead of its time.

Gotta love those T3's toughest looking car from that era...
I once read a quote from Mercedes Benz engineer he wrote the same words the AU Falcon shape was ahead of its time.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

AUTOTECH TUNED EDELEBROCK CHARGED
2017 GT Mustang Plenty of RWKW
SpoolMan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-03-2008, 03:45 PM   #65
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Interesting quote from Wheels, which is only just an opinion, but interesting.

"Can any replacement Mustang afford the new rear drive platform, when the best selling V6 version starts at less than US$20k."

That's the sort of thing that makes me so cynical about the new RWD platform, because it will need to be very cheap to manufacture to be able to be used in Mustang. To be able to be cheaply manufactured then means they will have to cut corners on design and materials to make it cheap and easy to make, so no aluminium suspension bits like the FG has. If the platform was solely to be used in Lincolns and Crown Vic as well as Falcon it wouldn't bother me so much, but a cut price budget platform isn't what the Falcon needs. Or maybe they will have 2 versions just like they did for the DEW98 platform, where the Jag S type had all the expensive alloy bits while the Lincoln LS and Thunderbird had a cheaper version.
2 versions makes sense, entry level, and premium versions (just like they do with the V6)
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL