Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2009, 04:32 PM   #31
Joshvee
A New Convert
 
Joshvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodp
I suggest you never frequent any American car forums from now on... :
On the contrary. I love American sites. They spell even worse than I do so no one notices my spullinn. : :
__________________
FG FPV F6 310 Dash
12.836 @ 174.29 Kph Factory Stock tune.
Joshvee is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 12:13 AM   #32
TaraHymen
Regular Member
 
TaraHymen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 66
Default

i think some of you may be a bit misinformed as to how this law and other relevant laws in wa work and why this is like swiss cheese. i own a small business and i employ staff. lets look at it from my point of view.

alot of people have mentioned that they consider it the employers responsibility to make sure thier employees have a license. there is no registry or database i can access to verify if my staff have a valid drivers licence and if i ring the fuzz they cant tell me either due to privacy laws - thats the first cracker.

i am legally entitled to ask my staff member to produce a drivers licence.
1)for abovementioned reasons i cant verify it is still legit
2)the staff member is legally entitled to refuse that request and there isnt a thing i can do about it.
so what do i do then? what if part of thier job description involved driving a car other than thier own? do i ban them them from driving my vehicles and not meet thier full job description?

you CANNOT sack someone for losing thier licence regardless of thier job description. not so long ago a person successfully sued a forrestfield transport company for wrongful dismissal after he was sacked because he had no licence. this one gets juicier - he was employed as a truck driver and was driving a fully loaded 5 tonne truck when he got stopped on canning hwy. the police then arrested him for driving with no licence leaving the fully loaded truck on the roadside. of course you're gonna sack him. by law he should've been offered alternative duties until his licence was reinstated.

putting something illegal in a job contract about job status being effected by licence status is still illegal no matter who agrees to it and who signs it and wont stand up in a court of law.

i'll support the law when the govt supports me and enables me the power to verify licence status.

p.s. "accidently" leaving your foglights on?? LOL how did you lose your other points? "accidently" speeding etc?
TaraHymen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 01:08 AM   #33
Joshvee
A New Convert
 
Joshvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaraHymen
i think some of you may be a bit misinformed as to how this law and other relevant laws in wa work and why this is like swiss cheese. i own a small business and i employ staff. lets look at it from my point of view.

alot of people have mentioned that they consider it the employers responsibility to make sure thier employees have a license. there is no registry or database i can access to verify if my staff have a valid drivers licence and if i ring the fuzz they cant tell me either due to privacy laws - thats the first cracker.

i am legally entitled to ask my staff member to produce a drivers licence.
1)for abovementioned reasons i cant verify it is still legit
2)the staff member is legally entitled to refuse that request and there isnt a thing i can do about it.
so what do i do then? what if part of thier job description involved driving a car other than thier own? do i ban them them from driving my vehicles and not meet thier full job description?

you CANNOT sack someone for losing thier licence regardless of thier job description. not so long ago a person successfully sued a forrestfield transport company for wrongful dismissal after he was sacked because he had no licence. this one gets juicier - he was employed as a truck driver and was driving a fully loaded 5 tonne truck when he got stopped on canning hwy. the police then arrested him for driving with no licence leaving the fully loaded truck on the roadside. of course you're gonna sack him. by law he should've been offered alternative duties until his licence was reinstated.

putting something illegal in a job contract about job status being effected by licence status is still illegal no matter who agrees to it and who signs it and wont stand up in a court of law.

i'll support the law when the govt supports me and enables me the power to verify licence status.

p.s. "accidently" leaving your foglights on?? LOL how did you lose your other points? "accidently" speeding etc?
Very interesting read. Lots of info I didn't know about. Thanks for showing me the other side of the story.
__________________
FG FPV F6 310 Dash
12.836 @ 174.29 Kph Factory Stock tune.
Joshvee is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 01:09 PM   #34
superpursuit83
KITTY Crew Member
 
superpursuit83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 5,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaraHymen
i think some of you may be a bit misinformed as to how this law and other relevant laws in wa work and why this is like swiss cheese. i own a small business and i employ staff. lets look at it from my point of view.

alot of people have mentioned that they consider it the employers responsibility to make sure thier employees have a license. there is no registry or database i can access to verify if my staff have a valid drivers licence and if i ring the fuzz they cant tell me either due to privacy laws - thats the first cracker.

i am legally entitled to ask my staff member to produce a drivers licence.
1)for abovementioned reasons i cant verify it is still legit
2)the staff member is legally entitled to refuse that request and there isnt a thing i can do about it.
so what do i do then? what if part of thier job description involved driving a car other than thier own? do i ban them them from driving my vehicles and not meet thier full job description?

you CANNOT sack someone for losing thier licence regardless of thier job description. not so long ago a person successfully sued a forrestfield transport company for wrongful dismissal after he was sacked because he had no licence. this one gets juicier - he was employed as a truck driver and was driving a fully loaded 5 tonne truck when he got stopped on canning hwy. the police then arrested him for driving with no licence leaving the fully loaded truck on the roadside. of course you're gonna sack him. by law he should've been offered alternative duties until his licence was reinstated.

putting something illegal in a job contract about job status being effected by licence status is still illegal no matter who agrees to it and who signs it and wont stand up in a court of law.

i'll support the law when the govt supports me and enables me the power to verify licence status.

p.s. "accidently" leaving your foglights on?? LOL how did you lose your other points? "accidently" speeding etc?
Fair call, but you can check anyones license status as long as you have there date of birth and DL number.
But on the other hand are we going to do that every day ? As an employer I am responsible but can not check my boys every week. A employee could have lost all his points and not told me because he will suffer with employement. As said I can not sack them, but they will be on minimum hours and reduced income.
I have heard that Jiffy and Hosedoctor got there cars back already. And they may be ammending the law to take the drivers own car. Lets hope so, because if I let a driver slip through the system with an invalid license I am up for a minimum $1000 bucks a day lost income.
__________________
FOR SALE

BAII Super Pursuit 0083

Awsome power by XTREME FORD TUNING 500rwkw New ALLOY Block

Awesome exhaust by THE EXHAUST CENTRE MIDLAND


Awesome Kenne Bell Supercharger setup by AGRO! and Bluepower Racing Developments

Now with full DOT approval and Permitted for road use
superpursuit83 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 01:23 PM   #35
fos408
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 123
Default

that would make more sense if they gave you back your work vehicle and took the employees personal car
fos408 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 01:55 PM   #36
superpursuit83
KITTY Crew Member
 
superpursuit83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 5,267
Default

It takes 2 seconds to check your employee license status

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/_a...es/search.aspx
__________________
FOR SALE

BAII Super Pursuit 0083

Awsome power by XTREME FORD TUNING 500rwkw New ALLOY Block

Awesome exhaust by THE EXHAUST CENTRE MIDLAND


Awesome Kenne Bell Supercharger setup by AGRO! and Bluepower Racing Developments

Now with full DOT approval and Permitted for road use
superpursuit83 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 05:41 PM   #37
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTP owner
2 thoughts on why this law is not really all it's made up to be.


2. Girlfriend is a p plater, loses her licence for 2 speeding infringements on same piece of road in 1 day. She is not a bad driver, but just got caught by the revenue raiders. She is too embarrased to own up to losing her licence because you will bag her out fiercely. So she drives you pride and joy home on saturday because you were too drunk - you lose the car for doinjg what you thought was the right thing.
Not true as the licence is not suspended until the fine is paid and notification has been recieved, it is not cancelled straight away.

Also, how can this law punish those that are doing nothing wrong, if they were doing nothing wrong they would have a licence and still have a car. I am sorry but I do not see your logic.

As for the company owners of work vehicles, I am sure if they can prove that the person had an in date licence and has lost it due to points, DUI etc without informing the employer, they could probably get the car back. Obviously not to give back to the employee though.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 06:08 PM   #38
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDManual
When you can lose you licence for near nothing, for example if you are on your 12 month probation and you have your foglights (3 points), on accidentally here in VIC and that causes you to lose your licence, wouldnt you be annoyed about that and keep driving? I know I would as I would lose my job if i didnt, and possibly lose my house etc.
Am I more dangerous because I dont have a valid licence? Absolutely not.

Sure if you have lost it for Drink Driving or something serious, but its not fair otherwise. People should be able to risk having no insurance and just an extra fine for no licence.
;-)

As they say on JJJ...............

Friday .........................

Tool post of the week.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 09:10 PM   #39
TaraHymen
Regular Member
 
TaraHymen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by superpursuit83
It takes 2 seconds to check your employee license status

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/_a...es/search.aspx
thats fabo, thats all i wanted, thank you. now why couldnt the fuzz tell me about that when i phoned up and asked them about a facility such as this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by geckoGT
As for the company owners of work vehicles, I am sure if they can prove that the person had an in date licence and has lost it due to points, DUI etc without informing the employer, they could probably get the car back. Obviously not to give back to the employee though.
you're probably right as i saw on the news the jiffy van was returned. the biggest and main issue i have is the "confiscated regardless of owner" bit. what if my apprentice races over to the shop to get some parts in the workshop ute and gets nailed on the way. how am i gonna get home tonight? plus the hassle and time factor to get my car back.

i dont see why i should be held responsible and my vehicle be held to ransom over someone else's honesty or lack thereof?
TaraHymen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-07-2009, 09:16 PM   #40
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaraHymen
thats fabo, thats all i wanted, thank you. now why couldnt the fuzz tell me about that when i phoned up and asked them about a facility such as this.



you're probably right as i saw on the news the jiffy van was returned. the biggest and main issue i have is the "confiscated regardless of owner" bit. what if my apprentice races over to the shop to get some parts in the workshop ute and gets nailed on the way. how am i gonna get home tonight? plus the hassle and time factor to get my car back.

i dont see why i should be held responsible and my vehicle be held to ransom over someone else's honesty or lack thereof?

Make it clear to them that if they do anything to get busted and have a company/your personal vehicle confiscated and it will constitute instant dismissal and they will be at centrelink on monday. Then lodge a report with the police stating he did not have your permission and stole the vehicle if it happens.

If you give him the keys, you take responsibilty to a degree for what he does with it. That may not sound fair but it is kind of the way it is. It has to be otherwise people that want to hoon will just make sure they do it in someone elses car.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 04:24 AM   #41
kpcart
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
Default

its a good policy. Maybe if unlicensed people driving on our public roads get their car confiscated for 28 days, perhaps they will get it through their thick heads they shouldnt be doing it. Last year 18% of fatal crashes on WA were a result of these idiots.
I have the same amount of sympathy for anyone that breaks road rules including speeding. And i think multinovas are the best way for governments to make revenue, Being caught by a multinova is Equal to paying a voluntary tax. We were all tested before receiving our license to drive on public roads, and we all agreed when receiving those licenses that we would respect the laws of the land. Yet i see so many fools complaining about multinovas and now this new confiscation law. I understand those complaining from a business point of view, this law isnt perfect, but even today on the news i heard they will be changing it to make it easier for businesses, but Aussies are to blame, not the government, if we as Aussies obeyed our lands laws, there would be no issue, but so many of our people are absolute idiots im sorry to say.
kpcart is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 09:30 AM   #42
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpcart
its a good policy. Maybe if unlicensed people driving on our public roads get their car confiscated for 28 days, perhaps they will get it through their thick heads they shouldnt be doing it. Last year 18% of fatal crashes on WA were a result of these idiots.
I have the same amount of sympathy for anyone that breaks road rules including speeding. And i think multinovas are the best way for governments to make revenue, Being caught by a multinova is Equal to paying a voluntary tax. We were all tested before receiving our license to drive on public roads, and we all agreed when receiving those licenses that we would respect the laws of the land. Yet i see so many fools complaining about multinovas and now this new confiscation law. I understand those complaining from a business point of view, this law isnt perfect, but even today on the news i heard they will be changing it to make it easier for businesses, but Aussies are to blame, not the government, if we as Aussies obeyed our lands laws, there would be no issue, but so many of our people are absolute idiots im sorry to say.
Thats not going to be a ver popular view around here, but elements of it a very true. Going to be very interesting to see what happens now :
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 11:03 AM   #43
Gabbs
Curry in a hurry
 
Gabbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpcart
its a good policy. Maybe if unlicensed people driving on our public roads get their car confiscated for 28 days, perhaps they will get it through their thick heads they shouldnt be doing it. Last year 18% of fatal crashes on WA were a result of these idiots.
I have the same amount of sympathy for anyone that breaks road rules including speeding. And i think multinovas are the best way for governments to make revenue, Being caught by a multinova is Equal to paying a voluntary tax. We were all tested before receiving our license to drive on public roads, and we all agreed when receiving those licenses that we would respect the laws of the land. Yet i see so many fools complaining about multinovas and now this new confiscation law. I understand those complaining from a business point of view, this law isn't perfect, but even today on the news i heard they will be changing it to make it easier for businesses, but Aussies are to blame, not the government, if we as Aussies obeyed our lands laws, there would be no issue, but so many of our people are absolute idiots im sorry to say.

The laws that they brought in I have no problems with it will be great to have there car off the road for unlicensed drivers. I do have a problem with multinovas I would rather have more police presence on the road then multinovas. Multinovas can't catch people for other offences which are more dangerous then speeding.
Gabbs is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 07:04 PM   #44
Keepleft
Mot Adv-NSW
 
Keepleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpcart
its a good policy. Maybe if unlicensed people driving on our public roads get their car confiscated for 28 days, perhaps they will get it through their thick heads they shouldnt be doing it. Last year 18% of fatal crashes on WA were a result of these idiots.
I have the same amount of sympathy for anyone that breaks road rules including speeding. And i think multinovas are the best way for governments to make revenue, Being caught by a multinova is Equal to paying a voluntary tax. We were all tested before receiving our license to drive on public roads, and we all agreed when receiving those licenses that we would respect the laws of the land. Yet i see so many fools complaining about multinovas and now this new confiscation law. I understand those complaining from a business point of view, this law isnt perfect, but even today on the news i heard they will be changing it to make it easier for businesses, but Aussies are to blame, not the government, if we as Aussies obeyed our lands laws, there would be no issue, but so many of our people are absolute idiots im sorry to say.
Yes, yes, yes, all traffic police fines are voluntary.

Now allow me to follow you for one hour and see how many infractions on your part I can find:-)

* Absolute idiots? Probably an apt response, as most Aussie driver's deliberately - 'drive badly', its a national pastime.
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf
Keepleft is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 10:51 PM   #45
Joshvee
A New Convert
 
Joshvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabbs
The laws that they brought in I have no problems with it will be great to have there car off the road for unlicensed drivers. I do have a problem with multinovas I would rather have more police presence on the road then multinovas. Multinovas can't catch people for other offences which are more dangerous then speeding.
I think the only people who have a problem with multinovas are the people who break the law. Duh!

As far as more police presence goes, well, find a way to recruit more police so that we don't have a shortage and I'm sure you will see more police presence.
__________________
FG FPV F6 310 Dash
12.836 @ 174.29 Kph Factory Stock tune.
Joshvee is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-07-2009, 11:51 PM   #46
XD427
XD427
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Perth W.A.
Posts: 284
Default

I honestly cant believe people on hear are backing this law, I have my license and havent had my vehicle impounded I just feel its ridiculous that a government has the power to take what is yours and eventually sell it or crush it. I love Perth and grew up here but feel itis becoming more like a dictatorship or a totalitarian state than a democracy. I agree that these people who are breaking the law driving without a license should be punished I just dont feel the punishment fits the crime a couple days in jail community service etc.. would be better suited and have a greater impact on these people mind set than taking what theyve wrightfully earnt and paid for in most cases it insights hate for the police officers and those enforcing the law.

On the other side of the spectrum I personally know of someone who was drink driving (not his vehicle and therefore this new law would not have changed the outcome) and killed someone he was only just over the limit (not that that makes it any better) but served no jail term only lost his license and fined where is an associate who grew a couple of plants for personal consumption served 3 months in remand the system is a joke the punishment needs to fit the crime and i dont believe that taking someones vehicle is a fair punishment for driving without a license and for that matter neither is driving recklessly (hoons law)
__________________
Theres no substitute for cubesTheres no substitute for cubes
XD427 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL