Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2009, 08:43 PM   #61
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Actually it was discussed and if you look the change from Euro 4 to 5 isn't that big of a jump.
yes... discussed here
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-08-2009, 08:48 PM   #62
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,585
Default

And here I have been saving my pennies for when the announcement is made that the I6 will be killed off, was looking forward to getting some kind of swan song model.

Not a bad thing though, this engine has been developed on somewhat of a restricted budget compared to other world class engines; imagine what some serious cash could do to it.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-08-2009, 05:34 PM   #63
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

The I6 definately has a strong future if the costs add up. The engine plant is gauranteed safe till at least 2014 at the earliest, after that its a bit grey due to the confusion about the future Falcon platform, but future emmisions compliance shouldn't be a problem.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-08-2009, 05:37 PM   #64
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

I6 needs DI
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-08-2009, 06:38 PM   #65
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
I6 needs DI
It does very well without it, but it would be good to have.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-08-2009, 06:42 PM   #66
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
It does very well without it, but it would be good to have.

Power wise it wouldn't need it, but for ADR fuel consumption it would show up a lot of engine out there.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 05-08-2009, 06:50 PM   #67
dogwatch2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malazn mafia
Hmm.. somebody enlighten me, but if i'm not mistaken, weren't the 4.2 Litre Hemi Straight-6's (e.g. Hemi 265) able to push upwards of 225Kw naturally aspirated using old-school dizzy/carburettors/etc. How come after over 30 years we are only barely starting to see these figures again on Na 6 engines : ...
I think you will find that with the current power output methods the 225KW of old would be about 10% less = 205KW. Also it was 4.3 litre not 4.2. I had a "triple pack" engine in a Centura and it was lucky to get the old 18mpg on the highway and needed spark plugs changed every 15,000 km, let alone emissions, as mentioned, so the modern engines are pretty good.
dogwatch2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL