|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17-05-2010, 08:35 AM | #31 | |||
Force Fed Fords
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
|
Guys, lets not get carried away until some further info is released.
It's not like the air france crash last year where the ACARS showed over 37 failures which indicated aircraft related crash. To be honest I'm not too familiar with the A330 (although air france was pretty obviously aircraft related) and for my own reasons don't really want to be. Some of the lame's on my qf post who service these things would be the people to listen to and none of them appear to have speculated here. I love the Boeing v airbus stouches (sort of like ford v holden) and have participated in many of them but this will most likely end up as a crew related crash. As a general rule though, most mid air crashes where a plane disappears are aircraft related; most crashes on approach or departure are crew/atc related. BTW Danny, what you haven't included in your judgement of the 747 is just how many of those crashes were terrorist/atc/crew related.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley Quote:
|
|||