|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-08-2010, 05:20 PM | #31 | ||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
It makes sense, the 5L is a premium engine. But for Lincoln to play on the same level as BMW and Lexus and be taken seriously by consumers, it will need to reconsider its reliance on FWD core vehicles from Ford.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
||
04-08-2010, 05:42 PM | #32 | ||
The Vengeful One
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
|
A world wide Premium brand cannot have FWD cars in its line up, the big luxo brands like Merc, Audi and BMW all might over the odd FWD but there main big sedans are always RWD sedans, if Lincoln wants to play with the Germans they will have to really show there capable of making a top car RWD car
__________________
|
||
04-08-2010, 05:52 PM | #33 | |||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
Quote:
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
|||
04-08-2010, 07:45 PM | #34 | |||
I am Groot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
|
Quote:
__________________
.. McLaren F1 Dick Johnson Racing "Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe |
|||
04-08-2010, 07:54 PM | #35 | |||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Quote:
Ford are now where they want to be with, and as stated in recent times, there's no more cash dumped or wasted on other brands. Lincoln, due to PAG, was neglected and never really offered a quality product nor ownership experience. Mulally wants to change that, and he already is. If we can gauge if Ford is up to the task judging by their recent track record then I'm confident they will kick very big goals.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett. |
|||
04-08-2010, 07:59 PM | #36 | |||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Quote:
The reason "wescoent" has been quoted - see post 15 - is due to his info being very reliable.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett. |
|||
04-08-2010, 08:01 PM | #37 | |||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
Quote:
Interesting though the point on disposing of PAG and Lincoln having been neglected during the PAG years - why was there no product or development flow-through from PAG to Lincoln? They were all supposedly playing on the same field so to speak.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
|||
04-08-2010, 08:05 PM | #38 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,801
|
There is NOTHING to say that Lincoln can not be to Ford what Lexus is to Toyota. People don't even associate Toyota and Lexus with each other these days, Lexus is seen as a true alternative to BMW or Mercedes in the US. With time, Lincoln can be this, and can go global. Ford are on the right track, but I still have my reservations with Lincoln. I see Cadillac as a premium, modern brand, Lincoln to me is nothing more than an old hat rehashed Ford with extra leather, chrome and fake wood grain. And I bet there are many who would side with me here.
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 Escape Titanium 2.0L EcoBoost with Technology Pack in White Platinum PREVIOUS 2015 Fiesta ST / 2012 Focus Titanium / 2009 Fiesta Zetec / 2004 Fiesta Zetec |
||
04-08-2010, 08:21 PM | #39 | |||
I am Groot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
|
Quote:
__________________
.. McLaren F1 Dick Johnson Racing "Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe |
|||
04-08-2010, 09:36 PM | #40 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
|
Quote:
+2 Think 3 series and C class. Yes the Audi's are FWD/AWD but are also considered dynamically wooden. Lincoln range with a large/Med RWD sedan + Large sports coupé Mustang Based. Could work. And the white people mover is so bad and lacking in class it could be a Ssangyong.
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
|
|||
04-08-2010, 09:38 PM | #41 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
|
" ...a nuclear bomb going to be dropped on the Corvette. That is all."
Off topic but Falc'man, care to elaborate..
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
|
||
05-08-2010, 01:38 PM | #42 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
http://blogs.automobilemag.com/66240...les/index.html From the sounds of it, global performance vehicles will fall under a global badge (e.g. Focus RS will be Focus RS across the globe), if the GT was to go abroad, it would also keep its designation. However the performance brands themselves don't appear to be changing, which to me sounds good especially since each brand (FPV, SVT and Team RS) is well established in its market. So I would think that if a performance variant Focus was launched, it may be called Focus ST globally, but each market will have it badged under a particular performance brand (SVT, FPV or Team RS). It may not sound like much difference, but the current XR5 badged vehicles would be replaced by the global ST badges. Focus ST is rumoured to debut at the Paris Motor Show within the next month or so. Our Falcons would fall under the 'Regional' performance vehicles as per the article. If the MKS/MKR were to be placed onto a GRWD platform with Falcon in the future, what are the possibilities of FPV being tasked with the performance variants? It could be sold under the SVT or a specific Lincoln performance brand globally. In terms of Ford/Lincoln's plans: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2010...NEWS/100809987 This article came out this week, highlights the expected changes in the vehicle lineups. MKS, Mustang, Taurus are all due to 're-engineering' around 2015-16. Note mention of a SVT Focus. Finally Ford have clarified the MKT/Flex situation: http://wot.motortrend.com/6670699/au...ere/index.html |
|||
05-08-2010, 10:00 PM | #43 | |||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Thanks for the links, FPV.
Quote:
That is all... j/k.. I really don't know much more than that, except that the bloke who said it is usually on the mark with his insider info. I wouldn't say it's off topic, either. A fitter, more efficient Ford, will and can make things like this happen. If they did well with the GT, at a time when they were enduring losses, then imagine if they attempt the same sort of thing having a heap of cash to work with. Ford's new way of thought is if it doesn't make money then we won't build it, so there are those that say something like another GT will not appear again. In contrast to that, this is the essence of the investment with Lincoln; having an extravagant line of models showcasing the very best in the auto industry, so having a hero model, for the same reason, should be in the back of Ford's mind.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett. |
|||
05-08-2010, 10:27 PM | #44 | ||
FORMERLY TX3DUDE
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "THE GONG"
Posts: 2,487
|
So no real word - we wait....
|
||
06-08-2010, 12:00 AM | #45 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
|
Are they still getting rid of Mercury?
Hope not. Just checked, seems they are, bye another historic brand. |
||
06-08-2010, 02:05 AM | #46 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
Quote:
Look at this dinosaur page. http://www.mercuryvehicles.com/allvehicles.asp You'd think that page hadn't been updated for 5 years. Even then the Grand Marquis still looks out of place. Mercury is just a brand name, not a manufacturer, so let it go I say. |
|||
06-08-2010, 11:09 AM | #47 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Lincoln to focus on new smaller cars and SUVs in the future according to this hypothesis
Quote:
|
|||
06-08-2010, 07:12 PM | #48 | ||
FORMERLY TX3DUDE
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "THE GONG"
Posts: 2,487
|
gee..... whats RWD/AWD, smaller than a town car and goes like the clappers????
|
||
07-08-2010, 08:28 AM | #49 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
I honestly thought the Navigator would see the 6.2. Oh well, I'm not buying one anyway. (at this stage)
|
||