Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-08-2010, 08:41 PM   #31
GYRKIN GT
Regular Member
 
GYRKIN GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NSW Central Coast
Posts: 114
Default

The fuel consumption figures on the windscreen stickers have nothing to due with on-road testing, it's all done in a Lab
GYRKIN GT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 09:40 PM   #32
Yellow_Festiva
Where to next??
 
Yellow_Festiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GYRKIN GT
The fuel consumption figures on the windscreen stickers have nothing to due with on-road testing, it's all done in a Lab
Yes, but they would all be tested in the same manner. So the consumption results in the lab should still roughly correspond with on road consumption results.
Yellow_Festiva is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-08-2010, 09:45 PM   #33
GYRKIN GT
Regular Member
 
GYRKIN GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NSW Central Coast
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva
Yes, but they would all be tested in the same manner. So the consumption results in the lab should still roughly correspond with on road consumption results.
Completely agree with you. All I'm saying is that variables such as airflow or drag simply don't come into the equation because the car remains in a stationary position, inside a building, on rollers for the test to be carried out. As far as lab results corresponding to the real world you're right, particularly with the urban part of the test. The extra urban may be slightly more difficult to achieve but we all know that it can be done.
GYRKIN GT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2010, 08:38 PM   #34
Romulus
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Romulus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 5,414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Noise
I’ve got a theory. They’re driven harder.
Damn right, much harder, and faster :

My SP tips the scales at 1920kgs wet without driver or cargo. ATM it's probably weighing in at 2200kgs. 12.6l/100km is good economy though.
__________________
2021 BMW M550i in Black Sapphire Metallic.
11.52 @ 120mph stock
Romulus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2010, 09:43 PM   #35
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

My sense of logic tells me that they must have some way to factor in drag coefficients and weights to add resistance in the testing. Otherwise there is no logical reason that a sedan will be more economical than an equivalent ute in controlled lab testing if all driveline ratios and engine capacities are equal.

Think of it this way, in the VEII holden are redesigning the junction between the front bar and the front wheel arch without expensive changes in metal panel stamping, as this area is a bad area for aerodynamic drag in VEI, all to improve fuel economy. Why would they be very concerned about it if it was not going to make any difference to the advertised fuel consumption under ADR 81/02?
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-08-2010, 04:16 PM   #36
aussie muscle
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
aussie muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GYRKIN GT
The fuel consumption figures on the windscreen stickers have nothing to due with on-road testing, it's all done in a Lab
i agree with GYRKIN GT, basically means wind-resistance is never a factor in testing...
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO.
aussie muscle is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL