|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-10-2010, 07:04 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,525
|
Hey guys, I've got a question, what year did rear seatbelts become compulsory on cars? I'm curious is you own a car before this certain date its legal to not wear seatbelts in the back?
What about front seatbelts? |
||
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:13 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
Formally Kia Chaser
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 2,493
|
You have to wear seatbelts where fitted
If there are no seatbelts in the back, you don't have to wear them, but if they are in the front, you do...
__________________
Kia Grand Carnival (2006) Silver, Grill Mesh, Tints, Sidesteps (with lights), Towbar, 7" Touch Screen DVD Tuner with intergrated GPS & Bluetooth, Roof Mounted Flip Down 15.1" LCD Screen, Reverse Camera - 184Kw HSV Clubsport R8 VY (2003) Black, 6sp Manual, Coulson Seats, Red on black interior, Pacemaker extractors, Twin 2.5" exhaust, Custom Red 20" VE GTS Rims, Custom Red Stitching
|
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:14 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Excessive Fuel User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In the servo....again
Posts: 123
|
Neither my Mustang (65) or EH (63) have rear seatbelts, my understanding is that, provided all of the seatbelt equipped seats are filled, it is legal for people to travel in the other, non-seatbelt equiped seats.
Also, have mate with a '49 Mercury, no seat belts at all, and he drives it everywhere.
__________________
XD 351 Sedan '65 Mustang (Australian Delivery) '63 EH Special sedan (FOR SALE) '10 CX9 Luxury (Family Truckster) PBF 289 (POWERED BY FORD)Vic Number Plates for sale |
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:25 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,525
|
Would most American import 60s cars have front seatbelts?
|
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:32 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Excessive Fuel User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In the servo....again
Posts: 123
|
I would think so, when the Mustang was released in 1964, it came equipped with front seatbelts, although they were a delete option (for a $7 credit!).
__________________
XD 351 Sedan '65 Mustang (Australian Delivery) '63 EH Special sedan (FOR SALE) '10 CX9 Luxury (Family Truckster) PBF 289 (POWERED BY FORD)Vic Number Plates for sale |
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:33 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
Donating Member
 Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
|
In QLD, All cars imported that were built before 1960 do not have to meet any ADR requirements. 61-72 require LO2, 73-87 Require LO3 (or LO1 cant remember), 1988 and post require FULL adr compliance in accordance with the year of manufacture.
Australian built vehicles simply require them to be factory spec, for example a 68 Fairlane didnt have rear seatbelts, only fronts. So thats all you have to comply with. At least in QLD anyway. |
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:38 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
Donating Member
 Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 4,284
|
I'm not sure, but I think the ADR's changed around 1972 that rear seat belts were compulsory in post '72 vehicles.
|
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#8 | ||
|
Size it up
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: big blue ball of mostly water
Posts: 591
|
# Every passenger car manufactured or assembled after Jan. 1, 1968, shall be equipped with a lap-type safety belt assembly for each permanent passenger seating position. This requirement shall not apply to police vehicles.
Maybe? All I knows is once you voluntarily fit them to the rear they can never be removed. |
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 08:11 PM
|
#9 | |||
|
Moderator
  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,582
|
Quote:
The front belts needed to be fitted before a RWC inspection in the early '70's, cannot remember exactly which year, probably 1970 when they became compulsory to wear them when fitted. But I do remember fitting them to older cars for RWC in the mid '70's. However some older cars are still exempt for having front seat belts even to today. My 1951 MGTD that I restored in the late 1980's didnt require them at all, probably as there was no suitable structure to mount them to. One reason why I eventually sold it.... |
|||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 08:41 PM
|
#10 | ||
|
Size it up
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: big blue ball of mostly water
Posts: 591
|
 oops, fronts 1/1/69, rear 1/1/71 adr04
|
||
|
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 08:44 PM
|
#11 | |||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,582
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
ADRs and seatbelts
Linear Mode
