Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-10-2008, 09:22 PM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,307
Question FORD To Sell MAZDA ?

While GM is being swamped with the persistent rumors surrounding the addition/dissolution of Chrysler, Ford's rumor mill has been heading in the complete opposite direction. It appears Volvo is on the way out of Dearborn, but Mazda may be sneaking through the exit first. Recent reports since disputed by Mazda have Ford selling off a portion of its 33.4% stake in the Japanese automaker, which means the Blue Oval would lose majority ownership status. The Nikkei daily in Japan has been all over the Ford/Mazda story, and the latest news involves selling 20% of Mazda to 20 Japanese firms including some insurance companies, leaving Ford with a stake of around 13%.

Ford is allegedly unwilling to sell the shares to its competition, so splitting the Mazda shares in 20 small chunks makes picking up all the shares difficult. Besides five insurance companies, parts maker Denso, steel companies, and trading companies are also rumored to be taking part in the purchase. The price of 1% Mazda ownership is in the neighborhood of $40 million, and the total sale could approach $1 billion. Japanese media is reporting that any deal could be announced next month, and neither Mazda or Ford are saying a word at this point.

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2008, 10:11 PM   #2
uranium_death
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
uranium_death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gren A Waverrey
Posts: 2,404
Default

Although Ford selling off a portion/all of their share in Mazda will generate funds, won't it only be a short term measure?

I know Ford really need the funds NOW, but long term, with Mazda doing ok, I would have liked to see Ford keep it.
__________________
Practicing - Sleeping with a guitar in your hand counts, as long as you don't drop it.

Don't snap my undies.
uranium_death is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2008, 10:15 PM   #3
XR6_190
BF XR6, oh yeah!!
 
XR6_190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melton, Vic
Posts: 1,015
Default

Why would Ford want to be selling off what is most likely it's most profitable arm?
__________________
Current ride: 2005 BF XR6 Sedan, Lightning Strike, ZF Auto
Previous ride: 2001 AUII Futura Sedan, Narooma Blue
XR6_190 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-10-2008, 11:00 PM   #4
Hunter
Ex EL Falcon
 
Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bris-bane
Posts: 683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6_190
Why would Ford want to be selling off what is most likely it's most profitable arm?
Because it has serious cash flow problems. There's no point in keeping a profitable company if the parent company doesn't have enough money to keep the day to day operations going. In some senses the best thing Ford could do is sell Mazda and use the income generated by the sale to get themselves out of trouble.
__________________
Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration, don't fail us now!
Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 10:30 AM   #5
EgoFG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
Default

lets pretend I have cancer

It is in my left leg, and it is bad.
The tumor, as it grows is pulling all the nutrients out of my body, and I am loosing too much weight.

I should then cut off my right arm ?

While I understand the economics in the decision, it is not in the companies long term interest to sell a profitable part, it should remove the thing that is broken.

This is very hard for an american company to grasp - especially when it is the american business that if flawed.

Ford, and GM should both look at rationalising their american presence.
Ford produces the same car, in different spec levels under different brands (Ford - Crown Vic, Mercury - Grand Marquis, Lincoln - Town Car --- as an historic example)

GM have a similar policy.

Ford US should consider rationalisation of its brands before selling profitable business ventures such as Mazda and Jaguar ... oops too late
EgoFG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 11:13 AM   #6
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

If it happens it will be another DUMB decision by a company that seems to be good at making them. :

Mazda is a cash cow. If they sell of a share of it the profits Mazda bring in would probably add up more than the sale price in a year or 2, making future profits smaller. Thats always Fords problem, not looking far enough ahead, its all about what's happening tommorrow, not next year or the year after. No wonder they are going so far down the tubes. Detroit HQ are retards.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 11:20 AM   #7
whales
351 Cleveland:Pure Muscle
 
whales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 248
Default

Ford would better off selling Mazda cars not their share in the company. Ford atpresent can't build a decent or even sell their own branded vehicles. At least there is a market for Mazda cars.
__________________
Cheers
whales is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 11:33 AM   #8
Hunter
Ex EL Falcon
 
Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bris-bane
Posts: 683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whales
Ford would better off selling Mazda cars not their share in the company. Ford atpresent can't build a decent or even sell their own branded vehicles. At least there is a market for Mazda cars.
Err but the Focus and the Mazda 3are, aside from a couple of minor differences and body shape, the same car... The problem is that the Aussie Focus is built in bloody South Africa and then there's the whole Ford dealer issue...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
If it happens it will be another DUMB decision by a company that seems to be good at making them. :

Mazda is a cash cow. If they sell of a share of it the profits Mazda bring in would probably add up more than the sale price in a year or 2, making future profits smaller. Thats always Fords problem, not looking far enough ahead, its all about what's happening tommorrow, not next year or the year after. No wonder they are going so far down the tubes. Detroit HQ are retards.
As I said before, Mazda DOES make money for Ford BUT Ford does not have enough money to keep afloat in the short term... they can keep Mazda all along and it may well make them more money down the track but if they don't have the cash flow to survive until then they won't be around to see the profits! In other words, not selling Mazda would be pointless if Ford won't live long enough to reap the rewards... better off selling SOME of Mazda while it is doing well then keep a small part of it to keep a share of the profits down the track...

What is the alternative? Do nothing and go broke?
__________________
Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration, don't fail us now!
Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 11:43 AM   #9
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

EgoFG, not a bad analogy, but I'd say the cancer should be in the chest - can't just cut that off. Ie can't just stop selling cars in the US, not only would it be a bitter pill to swallow, the cost to do so would be prohibitive.
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 12:03 PM   #10
Fordman1
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Fordman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,819
Default

Mazda will outsell Ford in Australia next year.

Book-mark it !

The brand has a problem here, Mazda doesn't.

It's a shame Ford want to offload a brand that is successful.
Fordman1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 02:15 PM   #11
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

Guys it's pretty simple - as Mazda is making cash inflows, it would be one of the few non-core business assets on Ford's books that would hold any value. The cancer analogy doesn't work in business - no other company wants to buy a dog.
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 04:31 PM   #12
Wally
XP Coupe
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,098
Default

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/f...s-to-insurers/
Wally is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 04:35 PM   #13
BlackLS
yum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,417
Default

Same reason why Land and Range Rover were sold off, as well as Aston Martin.
__________________
2005 LS Focus LX
Nov05 | Manual | Black Sapphire
250,000kms.

BlackLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 05:23 PM   #14
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,228
Default

Ford is only selling 20% of their 33% stake, they will still have a share.
They need money now, if they don't then there isn't going to be Ford (not that I think they will survive anyway).
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 05:54 PM   #15
Rodp
Regular Schmuck
 
Rodp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
Default

The cancer analogy isn't a good one here.

I obviously don't know the financials... and for forum members to claim that Ford are stupid to sell off a portion of their share in Mazda is short sighted (I suspect that an educated group of people with all the facts that make up Ford are in a better position than someone who has an internet connection). It may well be a profit arm of Ford, but for them to contemplate selling it off obviously shows that Ford are in dire straights and need cash TODAY.

A better analogy would be Mazda sitting on the arm of someone and inside that someone is a bomb in their stomach. If it blows, doesn't matter what's on the arm.
Rodp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 06:44 PM   #16
Fordman1
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
Fordman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodp
The cancer analogy isn't a good one here.

I obviously don't know the financials... and for forum members to claim that Ford are stupid to sell off a portion of their share in Mazda is short sighted (I suspect that an educated group of people with all the facts that make up Ford are in a better position than someone who has an internet connection). It may well be a profit arm of Ford, but for them to contemplate selling it off obviously shows that Ford are in dire straights and need cash TODAY.

A better analogy would be Mazda sitting on the arm of someone and inside that someone is a bomb in their stomach. If it blows, doesn't matter what's on the arm.

It seems Ford may have cash flow problems. It maybe quite serious.
Fordman1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 07:00 PM   #17
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodp
(I suspect that an educated group of people with all the facts that make up Ford are in a better position than someone who has an internet connection).
If they were sooooo smart, they wouldn't be in the position they are now.
Unfortunately the big 3 (GM, Ford and Chrysler) dont really think that far ahead, or set their business up to change if there is a major shift in the market.
The Japanese on the other hand are quite good at it. But then again the two countries do have different cultures that would dictate this.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 07:04 PM   #18
Rodp
Regular Schmuck
 
Rodp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
If they were sooooo smart, they wouldn't be in the position they are now.
Unfortunately the big 3 (GM, Ford and Chrysler) dont really think that far ahead, or set their business up to change if there is a major shift in the market.
The Japanese on the other hand are quite good at it. But then again the two countries do have different cultures that would dictate this.
I didn't say they were smart but I'll not put myself in the position of thinking I know better than those that know all the facts.

Perhaps they did think that far ahead, but they got it wrong...? Doesn't make them stupid, just makes them wrong.
Rodp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 07:50 PM   #19
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodp
Perhaps they did think that far ahead, but they got it wrong...? Doesn't make them stupid, just makes them wrong.
Unfortunately from my experience Ford doesn't think that far ahead.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-10-2008, 08:06 PM   #20
snakeoil
Snake Oil
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 379
Default

The brand has a problem here, Mazda doesn't.

Mazda has had a history of huge problems the early rotarys nearly sent them broke
The mazda corporation fell into Fords hands because of a sub prime type thing which wiped out Japan in the late eighties>Japan still has not recovered
Except Toyota,Subaru,Honda all of the Japanese manufacturers fell over

the Koreans .............much the same KIA DAI WOO fell over
I drove recently a ( Dark side ) Statesman Grange and rate it as one of the 10 best cars I have ever driven.So if we are going to move forward and demand what we really want cash talks.Words dont

Cheers
__________________
Snake

2015 Mercedes C180 Coupe White/Black
2011 FG GS Ute manual #246 White/Black
2010 Chrysler Sebring limited hardtop Silver/grey
2003 UX Explorer V8 White/grey
2008 Suzuki Bandit GSF 1250 Black
2016 Victory Cross Country Tour Black
2011 Glastron GT 185 (USA made bowrider)White/Black
1988 Komatsu FG10 Forklift
FPV & XR Owners Club of Victoria #975
Ullysees Member #18,554
snakeoil is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2008, 08:13 AM   #21
EgoFG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Unfortunately the big 3 (GM, Ford and Chrysler) dont really think that far ahead
Yeah, What he said

The trouble is, that now they have left themselves without the luxury of being able to look to the future.

So Sell, Sell, Sell it is.

Shame -

IMHO US international companies are far too shortsighted, and too US-centric.
EgoFG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2008, 08:36 PM   #22
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EgoFG
Yeah, What he said

The trouble is, that now they have left themselves without the luxury of being able to look to the future.

So Sell, Sell, Sell it is.

Shame -

IMHO US international companies are far too shortsighted, and too US-centric.
The US brands are US-centric because thats where the market is.

To say Ford have sat on their hands and couldn't see this happening is nonsense, the writing has been on the wall and every blind freddy has seen the trouble. They sold LR/Jag for cash, Aston Martin and will now shed some more assests to maintain they core business "the blue oval".

They aren't docotors treating a cancer patient. They're accountants saving a business.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-10-2008, 10:28 PM   #23
SM1DY
LIKE A BOSS 351
 
SM1DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
Default

$40 million for 1% hmm......I'll pass
SM1DY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2008, 03:09 PM   #24
EgoFG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irlewy86
They're accountants saving a business.
Although I know I am taking you out of context ...

This is the problem I am talking about - accountants managing by this year's bottom line, rather than ongoing profitability - this has been the case for far too long - supported by professional executives motivated only by this year's bonuses ... But I dont feel like talking from that soap box just now.

And I like the fact that you took my "US international companies" and made it "US Brands"
That is far too true - Toyota has opted to become an international company. Ford and GM are much more simply US Brands.
EgoFG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-10-2008, 03:23 PM   #25
JAZSXY
Parts Fiend
 
JAZSXY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,587
Default

A simple rule of life.
What goes up must come down. Resources, stocks etc have all crashed. The economic growth has burst its bubble and everyone is trying to secure up cash before the worst hits (Expected next year) which is making everything even worse.

What is happening around the world, jobs lost, economies collapsing, business's going bust all comes down to one word...Greed.
__________________
Successful Sales With

frenzal56, falconxr, loosecannon, lima_been, bo5ton, Mardk, Chapter Four, leakey, POELWYK, Dman4.0, rayban76, tutor, PridenJoy, Aplito Futura, sbutler, Bosko, storta1, portokatsiki, AUte, 5.8, xxxg, FTW-302, LeadFoot81, Peuty, BillM, Sox, needfordspeed, watejs06, CATXR8
JAZSXY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-11-2010, 08:47 PM   #26
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

http://www.caradvice.com.au/91568/fo...t-mazda-share/

Quote:
Ford to sell up to 8 percent of its 11 percent Mazda share
By Brett Davis | November 17th, 2010

We reported a couple of weeks ago that Mazda shares owned by Ford could be up for sale. Earlier reports today confirm Ford is looking to sell most of its remaining stock in Mazda Motors Japan, and even has a number of buyers lined up to take a deal.

Nikkei business daily reported a month ago that Ford was looking to sell most of its 11 percent share in Mazda, but now says Ford has up to 10 companies ready to buy as much as 70 percent of its stake, leaving Ford owning just three percent. The Nikkei report says Itochu and Sumitomo companies are said to buy three percent each at a price of $US119.7 million ($122.5 million).

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Mazda’s main lender, already holds 2.9 percent share and is said to buy more, while the rest of the shares will be sold to some of Mazda’s components and parts suppliers.

Ford is hoping that selling the shares will give the company more flexibility in the Chinese market, so it can sell more models and compete more freely in certain segments.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL