Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-07-2010, 06:24 PM   #91
04redxr8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
04redxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by castellan
Do you live in Brisbane. are you a tiler. if you are i hope you do charge for compo beds. i do but it is hard when competing with all the so called tilers and some so called builders.
I would love to talk with you any day you like. send a private messages for that.

Yes, I am a Brisbane Tiler. Are you?

Tilers who don't charge for topping, usually don't know what they are doing. I laugh at tight people who won't pay what a job is worth. I have plenty of work to not worry about it.

Back on topic.

The AU onwards utes are not full chassis?? Now I'm confused, as my last 2 had a chassis under the rear. Are they a seperate chassis to the front rails?

I have seen some shocking things in utes. It seems people think that if it fits in the space provided, it must be safe. I would have loved to see how low that rear was before it let go.
04redxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-07-2010, 10:21 PM   #92
Brendo_GSUte
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 825
Default

Perfectly normal to have that kind of angle on the Holden IRS... HAHA

at least hes now in the market for a Ford!
Brendo_GSUte is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-07-2010, 10:41 PM   #93
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

i have no qaulms with leaf springs, i`d rather have leafs than irs in a wagon or ute any day, cheaper to repair if the need ever arises even though they are almost indestructable for the most part, axle bearings easy to change, generally lighter, i think more space in the load area between the wheel arches.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-07-2010, 10:45 PM   #94
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 04redxr8
The AU onwards utes are not full chassis?? Now I'm confused, as my last 2 had a chassis under the rear. Are they a seperate chassis to the front rails?
No Falcon ute has had a full chassis. Apart from those 4x4 XY utes from the 1970's. What you see with the AU-onwards "cab chassis" utes is a sort-of hybrid setup where a rear ladder chassis section is joined to the front half of a passenger car. The cabin and front end is still the same standard monocoque/unitary construction as the sedan and the rear ladder section is mated to the floorpan monocoque of the car early in the manufacturing process from separate stampings. As opposed to Holden's method with its recent one tonner that bolted the whole rear section to the cabin.

Ford essentially has a flexible modular platform design and manufacturing process where three different vehicle types (sedan, ute, wagon) were able to be made off the one platform in the one assembly plant, on the one assembly line.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-07-2010, 10:57 PM   #95
04redxr8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
04redxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
No Falcon ute has had a full chassis. Apart from those 4x4 XY utes from the 1970's. What you see with the AU-onwards "cab chassis" utes is a sort-of hybrid setup where a rear ladder chassis section is joined to the front half of a passenger car. The cabin and front end is still the same standard monocoque/unitary construction as the sedan and the rear ladder section is mated to the floorpan monocoque of the car early in the manufacturing process from separate stampings. As opposed to Holden's method with its recent one tonner that bolted the whole rear section to the cabin.

Ford essentially has a flexible modular platform design and manufacturing process where three different vehicle types (sedan, ute, wagon) were able to be made off the one platform in the one assembly plant, on the one assembly line.
Thanks for clearing that up, I saw the rails at the rear of my 2 old utes and just assumed that they ran from front to rear. Never bothered to right under and check.
04redxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-07-2010, 10:42 AM   #96
castellan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 04redxr8
Yes, I am a Brisbane Tiler. Are you?

Tilers who don't charge for topping, usually don't know what they are doing. I laugh at tight people who won't pay what a job is worth. I have plenty of work to not worry about it.

Back on topic.

The AU onwards utes are not full chassis?? Now I'm confused, as my last 2 had a chassis under the rear. Are they a seperate chassis to the front rails?

I have seen some shocking things in utes. It seems people think that if it fits in the space provided, it must be safe. I would have loved to see how low that rear was before it let go.
Yes i have been a Tiler for 30 years. i work Brisbane, gold coast & Toowoomba.
I don't laugh about people wasting my time. i have had a gut full of that.
castellan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-07-2010, 07:27 PM   #97
04redxr8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
04redxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by castellan
Yes i have been a Tiler for 30 years. i work Brisbane, gold coast & Toowoomba.
I don't laugh about people wasting my time. i have had a gut full of that.
I ask what have they been quoted before going to see the job. When I hear dumb things like $40/m for 600x600 porcerlain, I ask why did they call me?
04redxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 10:51 AM   #98
TheyDontWantMus
Regular Member
 
TheyDontWantMus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 484
Default Re: Ambitious load in Holden

seeing as the other thread got locked because it was a repost..

I'm curious as to what weight was actually in the ute?

how are they given their load carrying ratings anyway? surely they must be able to carry above their rated load for a period without catastrophic failure?
TheyDontWantMus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 11:05 AM   #99
wrongwaynorris
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
wrongwaynorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,868
Default Re: Ambitious load in Holden

This is why you buy a Ford not a poxy bloody Holden .

http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...nt=BA_esky.jpg
wrongwaynorris is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 11:41 AM   #100
SM1DY
LIKE A BOSS 351
 
SM1DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
Default Re: Ambitious load in Holden

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongwaynorris
This is why you buy a Ford not a poxy bloody Holden .

http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...nt=BA_esky.jpg
I tried to copy this -



By doing this -



Twas a succes
SM1DY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 11:50 AM   #101
TheyDontWantMus
Regular Member
 
TheyDontWantMus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 484
Default Re: Ambitious load in Holden

but the falcon tray is about 180cm long, 110cm wide, and 45cm deep?

filling it with water is about 900kgs, so you're not actually overloading it, or not by much anyway.
TheyDontWantMus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 12:10 PM   #102
Pub247
Resident F1 Troll
 
Pub247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pakenham S.E. Melbourne
Posts: 1,560
Default Re: Ambitious load in Holden

did that on friday to a xh ute very sucessful
Pub247 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL